Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement of the leptonic branching ratios of the τ lepton

  • Experimental Physics
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields

Abstract

The leptonic branching ratios of the tau lepton have been determined from data collected by the OPAL detector in 1991 and 1992. From a sample of 27196 e+e→τ+τ candidates we find 7322\(\tau \to e\nu \bar \nu\) and 7941\(\tau \to \mu \nu \bar \nu\) candidates. Using efficiency and background estimates determined from a study of Monte Carlo events and control samples of data, the branching ratios\(B(\tau \to e\nu \bar \nu )\)=(18.14±0.20±0.28)% and\(B(\tau \to \mu \nu \bar \nu )\)=(17.48±0.18±0.23)% have been obtained. These new results have been combined with the published results for the 1990 OPAL data to yield the following branching ratios for data taken between 1990 and 1992:

$$\begin{gathered} B(\tau \to e\nu \bar \nu ) = (18.04 \pm 0.33)\% , \hfill \\ B(\tau \to \mu \nu \bar \nu ) = (17.36 \pm 0.27)\% . \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$

These leptonic branching ratios are used with other properties of the muon and tau-lepton to test the universality of charged current leptonic couplings in these decays. The ratio\(R_\tau = B(\tau \to hadrons + \nu _\tau )/B(\tau \to e\bar \nu _e \nu _\tau )\) is calculated using our measured values of the leptonic branching fractions of the tau and tau lifetime from which a value of α s (Q 2=M 2τ ) is extracted. The value of α s (Q 2=M 2Z ) is obtained byQ 2 evolution and agrees with the value from the Z0 line shape analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The OPAL Collaboration, G. Alexander et al., Phys. Lett. B266 (1991) 201.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The OPAL Collaboration, K. Ahmet et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth., A305 (1991) 275.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. P. Allport et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth., A324 (1993) 34.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Allison et al., Comp. Phys. Comm. 47 (1987) 55.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Brun et al., GEANT 3, Report DD/EE/84-1, CERN (1989).

  6. D. R. Ward, in Proceedings of the MC'91 Workshop, NIKHEF, Amsterdam, 1991.

  7. M. Arignon et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth., A313 (1992) 103.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. G. Charlton, F. Meijers, T. J. Smith, P. S. Wells, Nucl. Instr. and Meth., A325 (1993) 129.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Böhm, A. Denner and W. Hollik, Nucl. Phys. B304 (1988) 687; F. A. Berends, R. Kleiss, W. Hollik, Nucl. Phys. B304 (1988) 712; (BABAMC).

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Jadach, B. F. L. Ward, and Z. Was, Comp. Phys. Comm. 66 (1991) 276; (KORALZ, Version 3.8).

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Sjöstrand, Comp. Phys. Comm. 39 (1986) 347; (JETSET, Version 7.1).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Bhattacharya, J. Smith, G. Grammer, Phys. Rev. D15 (1977) 3267; J. Smith, J. A. M. Vermaseren, G. Grammer, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 3280.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Jadach, J. H. Kühn, and Z. Was, Comp. Phys. Comm. 64 (1991) 275; (TAUOLA, Version 1.5).

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Lyons, D. Gibaut and P. Clifford, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A270 (1988) 110.

    Google Scholar 

  15. The CLEO collaboration, O. S. Akerib et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 3610.

    Google Scholar 

  16. ‘Review of Particle Properties’, L. Montanet et al., Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) 1173.

    Google Scholar 

  17. The ALEPH collaboration, D. Decamp et al., Z. Phys. C54 (1992) 211.

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. J. Marciano, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 41 (1991) 469.

    Google Scholar 

  19. W. J. Marciano and A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) 1815.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. Britton et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (1992) 3000.

    Google Scholar 

  21. G. Czapek et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 17.

    Google Scholar 

  22. The OPAL Collaboration, R. Akers et al., Phys. Lett. B338 (1994) 497.

    Google Scholar 

  23. E. Braaten, S. Narison and A. Pich, Nucl. Phys. B373 (1992) 581 and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  24. F. Le Diberder and A. Pich, Phys. Lett. 286B (1992) 147.

    Google Scholar 

  25. The OPAL collaboration, P. Acton et al., Z. Phys. C55 (1992) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  26. The ALEPH Collaboration, D. Buskulic et al., Phys. Lett. B307 (1993) 209.

    Google Scholar 

  27. T. N. Truong, Phys. Rev. D47, (1993) 3999.

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. A. Shifman, A. L. Vainstein and V. I. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. B147 (1979) 385, 448, 519.

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. Narison, Phys. Lett. B300 (1993) 293.

    Google Scholar 

  30. G. Altarelli, Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Tau Lepton Physics, Montreux, (1994), CERN-TH 7493 (1994)

  31. S. Narison, Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Tau Lepton Physics, Montreux, (1994), CERN-TH 7506 (1994)

  32. G. Altarelli, P. Nason and G. Ridolphi, CERN-TH 7537 (1994).

  33. W. Bernreuther and W. Wetzel, Nucl. Phys. B197 (1982) 228.

    Google Scholar 

  34. The LEP Collaborations, ALEPH DELPHI L3 OPAL, and LEP Electroweak working group, CERN-PPE 94-187 (1994)

  35. The DELPHI collaboration, P. Abreu et al., Z. Phys. C55 (1992) 555.

    Google Scholar 

  36. The L3 collaboration, O. Adriani et al., Phys. Lett. B236 (1993) 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

OPAL Collaboration., Akers, R., Alexander, G. et al. Measurement of the leptonic branching ratios of the τ lepton. Z. Phys. C - Particles and Fields 66, 543–554 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01579629

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01579629

Keywords

Navigation