Skip to main content
Log in

A synthesis strategy for mechanical devices

  • Published:
Research in Engineering Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Good mechanical designs are often composed of highly integrated, tightly coupled components in which the interactions among the components are essential to the function and economic execution of the design. This assertion runs counter to design methodologies in other engineering fields, such as software design and circuit design, that advocate designs in which each component fulfills a single function with minimal interaction. Because of the geometry, weight, and cost of mechanical components, converting a single functional requirement into a single component is usually not practical. Each component may contribute to the performance of more than one function, and the performance of each function may be distributed over many components. In fact, most mechanical components perform not only the desired function, but also have many additional, unintended behaviors. In good mechanical designs, these additional behaviors often are exploited.

We describe a synthesis strategy to utilize these behaviors by transforming design specifications in a function-preserving manner to obtain function structures which correspond closely to collections of available components. This strategy is elaborated in the context of simple gearbox design.

We feel that design strategies derived from characteristics of good designs will foster improved design practice and facilitate the development of computer-based assistance to the designer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mostow, J., “Toward Better Models of the Design Process,”The AI Magazine, Spring 1985

  2. Rinderle, J.R. and Suh, N.P., “Measures of Functional Coupling in Design,”ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry, Vol. 104, 1982, pp. 383–388

    Google Scholar 

  3. Steinberg, L, Langrana, N., Mitchell, T., Mostow, J. and Tong, C., “A Domain Independent Model of Knowledge-Based Design,” Technical Report AI/VLSI Project Working Paper No. 33, Rutgers University, 1986

  4. Wirth, N., “Program Development by Stepwise Refinement,”Communications of the ACM, Vol. 14, No. 4, April 1971, pp. 221–227

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fenves, S.J. and Baker, N.C.,Spatial and Functional Representation Language for Structural Design, Elsevier Science (North-Holland), IFIP 5.2 1987

  6. Rinderle, J.R., “Implications of Function-Form-Fabrication Relations on Design Decomposition Strategies,”Computers in Engineering, 1986 Gupta, G., ed., American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 1986, pp. 193–198

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ulrich, K. and Seering, W., “Functional Sharing in Mechanical Design,”AAAI-88, 7th Natl. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, St. Paul, MN, 1988, pp. 342–347

  8. Suh, N.P., Bell, A.C. and Gossard, D.C, “On an Axiomatic Approach to Manufacturing and Manufacturing Systems,”ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry, Vol. 100, No. 2, 1978

  9. Maher, M.L., “HI-RISE and Beyond: Directions for Expert Systems in Design,”Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 17, 1985, pp. 420–427

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brown, D. and Chandrasekaran, B., “Expert Systems for a Class of Mechanical Design Activity,”Knowledge Engineering in Computer-Aided Design, Gero, J., ed., North-Holland, 1985, pp. 259–290

  11. Marcus, S., Stout, J. and McDermott, J., “VT: An Expert Elevator Designer That Uses Knowledge-Based Backtracking,” Department of Computer Science Technical Report CMU-CS-86-169, Carnegie-Mellon University, 1986

  12. Colburn, E.R., “Abstracting Design Relations,” Internal Lab Report, CMU-MEDL-88-25, Dept. of Mech. Engr., Carnegie Mellon University, 1988

  13. Lai, K. and Wilson, W.R.D., “FDL: A Language for Function Description and Rationalization in Mechanical Design,”Computers in Engineering, ASME, New York, 1987, pp. 87–94

    Google Scholar 

  14. Crossley, E., “A “Shorthand” Route to Design Creativity,”Machine Design, April 1980, pp. 96–100

  15. Pahl, G. and Beitz, W.,Engineering Design, The Design Council, Springer-Verlag, London, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ulrich, K. and Seering, W., “Conceptual Design: Synthesis of Systems Components,”Intelligent and Integrated Manufacturing Analysis and Synthesis, Liu, C.R., Requicha, A. and Chandrasekar, S., eds., American Society of Mechanical Engineerings, New York, 1987, pp. 58–66

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dudley, D.W.,Handbook of Practical Gear Design, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smith, S., Noorani, R. and Ghazavi, A., “Computer-Aided Design of a Component Gear Train,”Computers in Mechanical Engineering, May 1987, pp. 53–58

  19. Buchsbaum, F. and Freudenstein, F., “Synthesis of Kinematic Structure of Geared Kinematic Chains and Other Mechanisms,”Journal of Mechanisms Vol. 5, 1970, pp. 357–391

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ravisankar, R. and Mruthyunjaya, T., “Computerized Synthesis of the Structure of Geared Kinematic Chains,”Mechanism and Machine Theory Vol. 5, 1985, pp. 367–387

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prayoonrat, S. and Walton, D., “Practical Approach to Optimum Gear Train Design,”Computer Aided Design, Vol. 20, 1988

  22. Stiny, G., “Introduction to Shape Grammars,”Environment and Planning B, July 1980, pp. 343–351

  23. Fitzhorn, P., “A Computational Theory of Design,”Design Computing, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1988

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoover, S.P., Rinderle, J.R. A synthesis strategy for mechanical devices. Research in Engineering Design 1, 87–103 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580203

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580203

Keywords

Navigation