Skip to main content
Log in

A variable dimension algorithm for the linear complementarity problem

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

A variable dimension algorithm is presented for the linear complementarity problems − Mz = q; s,z ≥ 0; s i z i = 0 fori = 1,2, ⋯ ,n. The algorithm solves a sequence of subproblems of different dimensions, the sequence being possibly nonmonotonic in the dimension of the subproblem solved. Every subproblem is the linear complementarity problem defined by a leading principal minor of the matrixM. Index-theoretic arguments characterize the points at which nonmonotonic behavior occurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.W. Cottle, “Completely-Q matrices”,Mathematical Programming 19 (1980) 347–351.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.W. Cottle and G.B. Dantzig, “Complementary pivot theory of mathematical programming”,Linear Algebra and Its Applications 1 (1968) 103–125.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G.B. Dantzig,Linear programming and extensions (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  4. B.C. Eaves, “The linear complementarity problem”,Management Science 17 (1971) 612–634.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B.C. Eaves and H. Scarf, “The solution of systems of piecewise linear equations”,Mathematics of Operations Research 1 (1976) 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C.E. Lemke, “Bimatrix equilibrium points and mathematical programming”,Management Science 11 (1965) 681–689.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C.E. Lemke, “Some pivot schemes for the linear complementarity problem”, in: M.L. Balinski and R.W. Cottle, eds.,Mathematical programming study 7:Complementarity and fixed points problems (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978) pp. 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C.E. Lemke and S.J. Grotzinger, “On generalizing Shapley's index theory to labelled pseudomanifolds”,Mathematical Programming 10 (1976) 245–262.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C.E. Lemke and J.T. Howson, “Equilibrium points and bimatrix games”,SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 12 (1964) 413–423.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Scarf, with the collaboration of T. Hansen,The computation of economic equilibria (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  11. L.S. Shapley, “On balanced games without side payments”, in: T.C. Hu and S.M. Robinson, eds.,Mathematical programming (Academic Press, New York, 1973) pp. 261–290.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L.S. Shapley, “A note on the Lemke—Howson algorithm”, in: M.L. Balinski, ed.,Mathematical programming study 1:Pivoting and extensions (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974) pp. 175–189.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Stickney and L. Watson, “Digraph models of Bard-type algorithms for the linear complementarity problem”,Mathematics of Operations Research 3 (1978) 322–333.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Van der Heyden, “Refinement methods for computing fixed points using primitive sets”, Dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, CT (1979).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van der Heyden, L. A variable dimension algorithm for the linear complementarity problem. Mathematical Programming 19, 328–346 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581652

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581652

Key words

Navigation