Skip to main content
Log in

Fluoride treatment of osteoporosis: Cyclical non-blinded or continuous blinded studies?

  • Session XI: Treatment: Fluoride, Bisphosphonates, Anabolic Steroids And New Developments
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The future of sodium fluoride (NaF), the most potent osteoblast stimulator known to man, is in the balance. Of three recent randomized trials of continuous NaF only one found a significant invertebral fractures in the NaF group. When data from the first year were excluded, two of the studies (those with the largest numbers) showed a significantly reduced risk of vertebral fracture on NaF. The effect of NaF oncortical bone is poorly documented. Two studies have shown reduced forearm cortical bone density with continuous NaF. A further two (histomorphometric) studies have shown the development of increased cortical porosity on continuous NaF treatment. In one, this was selectively at the external cortex and was linearly correlated with cancellous volume increase. Our pilot study using NaF administeredcyclically has shown an encouraging (though non-significant) reduction in vertebral fracture rates (excluding year 1) and no fall in forearm cortical density. Another (US) cyclical study has shown no increase in cortical porosity. A current W. Australian randomized study of 50 patients is described where NaF dosage is varied proportional to the osteoblast response, and duration is dependent on densitometric and radiographic response. The future of NaF should involve cyclical administration, in cautious initial dosage (50–60 mg/day) of enteric-coated NaF, in conjunction with apotent inhibitor of resorption such as hormone replacement, bisphosphonates or calcitonin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hansson T, Roos B. The effect of fluoride versus calcium on spinal bone mineral content. Calcif Tissue Int 1987;40:315–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Riggs BL, Hodgson SF, O'Fallon WM, et al. Effect of fluoride treatment on the fracture rate of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1990;322:802–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kleerekoper M, Peterson EL, Nelson DA, et al. A randomized trial of sodium fluoride as a treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int 1991;1:155–61.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mamelle N, Meunier PJ, Dusan R, et al. Risk-benefit ratio of sodium fluoride treatment in primary vertebral osteoporosis. Lancet 1988;2:361–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meunier PJ, Fluoride salts and osteoporosis. In: Christiansen C, Overgaard K, editors. Osteoporosis 1990. Copenhagen: Osteopress, 1990:1308–13.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hodsman AB, Drost DJ. The response of vertebral bone mineral density during the treatment of osteoporosis with sodium fluoride. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1989;69:932–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gutteridge DH, Price RI, Kent GN, et al. Spontaneous hip fractures in fluoride-treated patients — potential causative factors. J Bone Miner Res 1990;5[Suppl 1]: S205–15.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Farley SMG, Wergedal JE, Smith LC, et al. Fluoride therapy for osteoporosis — characterization of the skeletal response by serial measurements of serum alkaline phosphatase activity. Metabolism 1987;36:211.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dupuis J. Etude comparative de fluorure de sodium et du monophosphate de sodium dans le traitement de 1'ostéoporose vert ébrale. Lyon: Thesis médicale, 1989.

  10. Briançon D, Meunier PJ. Treatment of osteoporosis with fluoride, calcium and vitamin D. Orthop Clin North Am 1981;12:629–48.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kragstrup J, Shijie Z, Mosekilde L, et al. Effects of sodium fluoride, vitamin D and calcium on cortical bone remodeling in osteoporotic patients. Calcif Tissue Int 1989;45:337–41.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gutteridge DH, Boivin G, Meunier PJ. Fluoride in postmenopausal osteoporosis: selective increase in external cortical porosity correlates with cancellous volume increase without change in cortical bone volume. In: Christiansen C, Overgaard K, editors. Osteoporosis 1990. Copenhagen: Osteopress, 1990:718–20.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zerwekh JE, Sakhaee K, Gonzales J, et al. Quantitative effects of slow-release sodium fluoride and calcium citrate on cortical bone. J Bone Miner Res 1991;6:[Suppl 1]:S279.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schnitzler CM, Mesquita JM, Gear KA, et al. Iliac bone biopsies at the time of periarticular stress fractures during fluoride therapy: comparison with pre-treatment biopsies. J Bone Miner Res 1991;5:141–52.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Devogelaer JP, Boutsen Y, Nagant de Deuxchaisnes C. A randomized controlled trial of ADP given intravenously with and without sodium fluoride in involutional osteoporosis. In: Christiansen C, Overgaard K, editors. Osteoporosis 1990. Copenhagen: Osteopress, 1990:1504–6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reginster JY, Caulin F, Huyghe C, et al. Bone effect of intermittent cyclical calcitonin and intermittent cyclical fluoride and calcitonin in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. In: Christiansen C, Overgaard K, editors. Osteoporosis 1990. Copenhagen: Osteopress, 1990:1493–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gutteridge, D.H., Kent, G.N., Prince, R.L. et al. Fluoride treatment of osteoporosis: Cyclical non-blinded or continuous blinded studies?. Osteoporosis Int 3 (Suppl 1), 215–217 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01621911

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01621911

Keywords

Navigation