Skip to main content
Log in

Reference data for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: What results are equivalent to the established limits of office blood pressure?

  • Originals
  • Published:
Klinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In 1039 subjects ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed to define threshold values, which are equivalent to the established limits of the office blood pressure.

Mean values and proportions of elevated single readings were correlated to office blood pressure by regression analyses. To avoid impact of varying sleeping periods on 24 h blood pressure, only daytime readings were considered.

Correlations between average daytime blood pressure and office blood pressure were linear: Mean daytime values of 135 mmHg (systolic) and of 84 mmHg (diastolic) were equivalent to the casual blood pressure limits of 140 mmHg and 90 mmHg.

Correlations between percentages of elevated single readings and office blood pressure were nonlinear: Proportions of 25% systolic readings > 140 mmHg and of 17% diastolic readings > 90 mmHg were equivalent to casual blood pressure limits of 140 mmHg and 90 mmHg.

On the basis of the regression equations, any result of ambulatory blood pressure recording during daytime can now be evaluated in terms of the established standards of office blood pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baumgart P, Walger P, Fuchs G, Dorst KG, Vetter H, Rahn KH (1989) 24 h blood pressure is not dependent on endogenous circadian rhythm. J Hypertens 7:331–334

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clark LA, Denby L, Pregibon D, Harshfield GA, Pickering TG (1987) The effects of activity and time of day on the diurnal variation of blood pressure. J Chronic Dis 40:671–681

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clement DL (1989) Home versus office monitoring of blood pressure: a European multicentre study of high blood pressure. J Hypertens 7 (Suppl 3):s49-s51

    Google Scholar 

  4. Drayer JIM, Weber MA, Chard ER (1984) Non-invasive automated blood pressure monitoring in ambulatory normotensive men. In: Weber MA, Drayer JIM (eds) Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Steinkopff, Darmstadt, pp 129–135

    Google Scholar 

  5. Drayer JIM, Weber MA (1985) Definition of normalcy in whole-day ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Clin Exper Hypertens A7:195–204

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fitzgerald DJ, O'Malley K, O'Brien ET (1984) Reproduc-ibility of ambulatory blood pressure recordings. In: Weber MA, Drayer JIM (eds) Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Steinkopff, Darmstadt, pp 71–74

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gosse P, Campello G, Poudaut R, Dallocchio M (1988) High night blood pressure in treated hypertensive patients: not harmless. Am J Hypertens 1:195s-198s

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jacot des Combes B, Porchet M, Waeber B, Brunner HR (1984) Ambulatory blood pressure recordings. Reproducibility and unpredictability. Hypertension 6:C110-C114

    Google Scholar 

  9. James GD, Pickering TG, Yee L, Harshfield GA, Riva S, Laragh JH (1988) The reproducibility of average ambulatory, home and clinic pressures. Hypertension 11:545–549

    Google Scholar 

  10. 1988 Joint National Committee (1988) The 1988 report of the Joint National Committee on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Arch Intern Med 148:1023–1038

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kennedy HL, Horan MJ, Sprague MK, Padgett NE, Shriver KK (1989) Ambulatory blood pressure in healthy normotensive males. Am Heart J 106:717–722

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marquardt DW (1963) An algorithm for least squares estimation on nonlinear parameters. J Soc Ind Appl Math 2:431–441

    Google Scholar 

  13. Perloff D, Sokolow M, Cowan R (1983) The prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressures. JAMA 249:2792–2798

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pessina AC, Palatini P, Di Marco A, Mormino P, Facio G, Libardoni M, Mos L, Casiglia E, Dal Palu C (1986) Continuous ambulatory blood pressure monitoring versus casual blood pressure in borderline hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 8 (Suppl 5): s93-s97

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pickering TG, Harshfield GA, Devereux RB, Laragh JH (1985) What is the role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertensive patients? Hypertension 7:171–177

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wallace JM, Thornton WE, Kennedy HL, Pickering TG, Harshfield GA, Frohlich ED, Messerli FH, Gifford RW, Bolen K (1984) Ambulatory blood pressure in 199 normal subjects, a collaborative study. In: Weber MA, Drayer JIM (eds) Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Steinkopff, Darmstadt, pp 117–128

    Google Scholar 

  17. White WB, Morganroth J (1989) Ambulatory monitoring of the blood pressure in the assessment of antihypertensive therapy. Am J Cardiol 63:94–98

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baumgart, P., Walger, P., Jürgens, U. et al. Reference data for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: What results are equivalent to the established limits of office blood pressure?. Klin Wochenschr 68, 723–727 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01647580

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01647580

Key words

Navigation