Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Use of a selective medium and a membrane filter method for isolation ofCampylobacter species from Spanish paediatric patients

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study was conducted to assess the value of a combination of two culture methods for isolation ofCampylobacter spp. from Spanish children. Seven hundred twenty-nine diarrhoea] stool specimens from 599 patients were examined forCampylobacter spp. by culturing them on charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar and on blood agar with a membrane filter. One hundred sixteenCampylobacter strains were isolated from a total of 108 specimens; 75 (64.6%) wereCampylobacter jejuni, 32 (27.5%) wereCampylobacter coli, 8 (6.8%) were non-typeable, and one (0.9%) wasCampylobacter upsaliensis. Campylobacters were isolated from 99 positive samples using charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar alone. The filtration technique alone yielded only 86 positive samples. Seven specimens yielded differentCampylobacter spp. with different media. The only catalase-negative strain was recovered using the filter method. The combination of the selective medium with the filter method increased the isolation rate ofCampylobacter strains by 14.1%. Isolation rates of campylobacters using the filter method were similar to those reported in European studies, in which a similar frequency ofCampylobacter upsaliensis was observed. The addition of a filter method for routine laboratory isolation of campylobacters should be considered in selected age groups (in children <10 years of age) or in areas where catalase-negative or weakly-positiveCampylobacter strains may be of epidemiological significance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Patton CM, Shaffer N, Edmonds P, Barrett TJ, Lambert MA, Baker C, Perlman DM, Brenner DJ: Human disease associated withCampylobacter upsaliensis (catalase-negative or weakly positiveCampylobacter species) in the United States. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1989) 27:66–73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Steele TW, Sangster N, Lanser JA: DNA relatedness and biochemical features ofCampylobacter spp. isolated in central and south Australia. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1985) 22:71–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goossens H, Vlaes L, De Boeck M, Pot B, Kersters K, Levy J, De Mol P, Butzler JP, Vandamme P: IsCampylobacter upsaliensis an unrecognised cause of human diarrhoea? Lancet (1990) 335:584–586

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bolton FJ, Hutchinson DN, Parker G: Reassessment of selective agars and filtration techniques for isolation ofCampylobacter species from feces. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases (1988) 7:155–160

    Google Scholar 

  5. Albert MJ, Tee W, Leach A, Asche V, Penner JL: Comparison of a blood-free medium and a filtration technique for the isolation ofCampylobacter spp. from diarrhoeal stools of hospitalised patients in central Australia. Journal of Medical Microbiology (1992) 37:176–179

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Figura N, Guglielmetti P, Zanchi A, Partini N, Armellini D, Bayeli PF, Bugnoli M, Verdiani S: Two cases ofCampylobacter mucosalis enteritis in children. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1993) 31:727–728

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lindblom GB, Sjögren E, Hansson-Westerberg J, Kaijser B:Campylobacter upsaliensis, Campylobacter sputorum sputorum andCampylobacter concisus as common causes of diarrhoea in Swedish children. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases (1995) 27:187–188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Etterijck R, Breynaert J, Revets H, Devreker T, Vandenplas Y, Vandamme P, Lauwers S: Isolation ofCampylobacter concisus from feces of children with and without diarrhoea. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1996) 34:2304–2306

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gilligan PH, Janda JM, Karmali MA, Miller JM: In: Nolte FS (ed): Cumitech 12A. Laboratory diagnosis of bacterial diarrhoea. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC (1992) pp. 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hutchinson DN, Bolton FJ: Improved blood-free selective medium for the isolation ofCampylobacter jejuni from faecal specimens. Journal of Clinical Pathology (1984) 37:956–957

    Google Scholar 

  11. Steele TW, McDermott SN: Technical note: the use of membrane filters applied directly to the surface of agar plates for the isolation ofCampylobacter jejuni from faeces. Pathology (1984) 16:263–265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Skirrow MB, Benjamin J: Differentiation of enteropathogenic campylobacter. Journal of Clinical Pathology (1980) 33:1122

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Harvey SM: Hippurate hydrolysis byCampylobacter fetus. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1980) 11:435–437

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mills CK, Gherna RL: Hydrolysis of indoxyl acetate byCampylobacter species. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1987) 25:1560–1561

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cook GT: A plate test for nitrate reduction. Journal of Clinical Pathology (1950) 3:359–362

    Google Scholar 

  16. Butzler JP, Skirrow MB:Campylobacter enteritis. Clinical Gastroenterology (1979) 8:737–765

    Google Scholar 

  17. Skirrow MB:Campylobacter enteritis: a “'new” disease. British Medical Journal (1977) 2:9–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goossens H, De Boeck M, Coignau H, Vlaes L, Van Den Borre C, Butzler JP: Modified selective medium for isolation ofCampylobacter spp. from feces: comparison with Preston medium, a blood-free medium, and a filtration system. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1986) 24:840–843

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Endtz HP, Ruijs GJHM, Zwinderman AH, Van Der Reijden T, Biever M, Mouton RP: Comparison of six media, including a semisolid agar, for the isolation of variousCampylobacter species from stool specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1991) 29:1007–1010

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Steele TW, McDermott SN: The use of membrane filters applied directly to the surface of agar plates for the isolation ofCampylobacter jejuni from feces. Pathology (1984) 16:263–265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Piersimoni C, Bornigia S, Curzi L, De Sio G: Comparison of two selective media and a membrane filter technique for isolation ofCampylobacter species from diarrhoeal stools. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases (1995) 14:539–542

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service of Microbiology, Clinic Hospital “Lozano Blesa”, Avenida San Juan Bosco 15, E-50009, Zaragoza, Spain

    L. López, F. J. Castillo, A. Clavel & M. C. Rubio

Authors
  1. L. López
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. J. Castillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Clavel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. C. Rubio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

López, L., Castillo, F.J., Clavel, A. et al. Use of a selective medium and a membrane filter method for isolation ofCampylobacter species from Spanish paediatric patients. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 17, 489–492 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01691131

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01691131

Keywords

Search

Navigation