Skip to main content
Log in

Cytology of different species of palms and its bearing on the solution of the problems of phylogeny and speciation

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Beal, J. M., 1937. Cytological studies in the genusPhoenix.Bot. Gaz., 99: 400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaduri, P. N., 1942. Cytological analysis of structural hybridity inRhoeo discolor Hance.J. Genet. 44: 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1944. Chromosome nucleolus relationship and its bearing on cytogenetical interpretation.Jour. Roy. Micr. Soc., 63: 91–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andC. S. Semmens, 1938. Root-tip smear technique and the differential staining of the nucleolus.J. Roy. Micr. Soc., 58: 120–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatter Ethelbert, S. J., 1926. The Palms of British India and Ceylon.

  • Chakravarti, A. K., 1948a. Theory of fragmentation of chromosomes and evolution of species.Sci. and Cult., 13: 309–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Amato, F., 1950. Differenzia zone istologica ger endopolyploidia nelle radici di alcune Monocotiledoni.Caryologia, 3: 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C. D. andE. K. Janaki Ammal, 1945. Chromosome Atlas of Cultivated Plants. George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Mol, W. E., 1928. Nucleolar number and size in diploid, triploid and aneuploidHyacinthus, La Cellule, 38: 1–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncar, R. E. andJ. G. Ross, 1950. The nucleus in differentiation and development.Jour. Hered., 41, 259–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huskins, C. L. andL. M. Steinitz, 1948. The nucleus in differentiation and development.Jour. Hered., 39: 35–43 and 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J. 1934. Families of flowering plants. II. Monocotyledons. Mac Millan and Co., Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janaki Ammal, E. K., 1945. Chromosome Atlas of Cultivated Plants. By Darlington, C. D. and Janaki Ammal, E. K. George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mookerjea, Archana, 1955a. Cytology of different species of Aroids with a view to trace the basis of their evolution.Caryologia, 7: 221–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1955b Cytology of Amaryllids as an aid to the understanding of evolution.Caryologia, 7: 1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mookerjea, Archana, 1956. A cytological study of several members of Liliaceae and their interrelationships.Ann. Vanamo Soc., latest issue, 1956.

  • Nemec, B., 1910.Das Problem der Befruchtungsvorgänge. Berlin.

  • Patel, J. S. andG. V. Narayana, 1937.Curr. Sci., 5: 479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radermacher, A., 1925.Ann. Jard. bot. Buitenz.,35: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roux, W., 1883. Ueber die Bedeutung der Kerntheilungsfiguren. Leipzig.

  • Santos, J. K., 1928.Philipp. J. Sci., 37: 417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, D., 1942. Karyotype alteration and phylogeny in Liliaceae and allied families. Jap. Jour. Bot.,12: 57–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A. K., 1956. A new concept of a means of speciation in plants.Caryologia (In press).

  • —, andA. K. Bal, 1953. Coumarin in chromosome analysis.Stain Tech., 28: 256–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A. K., 1954. Cytological study of a few genera of Amaryllidaceae with a view to finding out the basis of their Phylogeny. Abstract, 41st Ind. Sci. Cong., 25 (Paper in press-Cytologia, 1956).

  • — and (Miss)Archana Mookerjea 1954. Induction of division in cells. A study of the causal factors involved.Bull. Bot. Soc. Beng., 8: 24–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1955. Paradichlorobenzene and other chemicals in chromosome work.Stain Tech., 30: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A. K. andChitra Ghosh, 1954. Further investigation on the cytology of the family Amaryllidaceae and its bearing on the interpretation of Phylogeny.Genet. Iber., 6: 71–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • — andD. De, 1956. Polyploidy inDioscorea. Abstract, 42nd Ind. Sci. Cong., 248–249.Genetica, 28: 112.

    Google Scholar 

  • — andN. K. Das, 1954. Study of karyotypes and their alterations in Aroids.Agr. Lusit., 16: 23–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • — andN. K. Bhattacharyya, 1956. An investigation on the karyotype of the genusCrinum and its phylogeny.Abstract, 41st Ind. Sci. Cong., 147Genetica, 28: 121.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • — andR. N. Mukherji, 1956. Effect of irradiation on embryonic cells.Abstract, 42nd Ind. Sci. Cong., 250,Genetica, 28: 143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A. K. andS. K. Sarkar, 1955. A new technique for the study of chromosomes of Palms.Nature, 176: 261.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sinoto, Y., 1927.Cytologia, 1: 109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soderberg, E., 1919.Sv. bot. Tidskr., 13: 204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suessenguth, K., 1920.Beih. bot. zbl., 38: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjio, J. H. andA. Levan, 1950. The use of Oxyquinoline in chromosome analysis.Anal. Estac. Expt., Aula-Dei, 2: 21–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatasubban, K. R., 1945. Cytological studies in Palmae; chromosome numbers in a few species of Palms of British India and Ceylon.Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., 22: 193–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkata Rao, C., 1956. Embryological studies in Palmae.Abstract, 43 rd Ind. Sci. Cong., 225–227.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, A.K., Sarkar, S.K. Cytology of different species of palms and its bearing on the solution of the problems of phylogeny and speciation. Genetica 28, 361–488 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01694327

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01694327

Navigation