Skip to main content
Log in

The predictive factor — a method to simplify Bayes' formula and its application to diagnostic procedures

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Klinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

According to Bayes' rule the predictive value (PV) of a diagnostic test (= probability of disease if the test is positive) depends on the prevalence of the disease (= a priori probability), the sensitivity (c 1) and the specificity (c 2) of the test. A new variable has been introduced, the predictive factor (c), which is calculated as follows:c=c 1/(c 1+1−c 2). Since the PV only depends on this factor and on the prevalence, the calculation is much easier and a general graphical solution is possible. This simplification renders several additional advantages and facilitates the understanding of the dependence of PV on prevalence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bayes ET (1763) An assay toward solving a problem in the doctrine of chance. Philos Trans R Soc Lond [Biol] 53:370–418

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blumberg MS (1957) Evaluating health screening procedures. Operations Res 5:351–360

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fagan TJ (1975) Nomogram for Bayes' theorem. N Engl J Med 293:257

    Google Scholar 

  4. Farid NR, Bear JC (1981) The human major histocompatibility complex and endocrine disease. Endocr Rev 2:50–86

    Google Scholar 

  5. Galen RS, Gambino SR (1975) Beyond normality: The predictive value and efficiency of medical diagnoses. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Katz MA (1974) A probability graph describing the predictive value of a highly sensitive diagnostic test. N Engl Med 291:1115–1116

    Google Scholar 

  7. Köbberling J (1982) Der prädikative Wert diagnostischer Maßnahmen. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 107:591–595

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lusted LB (1976) Clinical decision making. In: de Dombal FT, Gremy F (eds) Decision making and medical care. North-Holland Publishing Company, pp 77–99

  9. Neyman Y, Pearson ES (1933) On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypothesis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond [Biol], Series A 231:289–337

    Google Scholar 

  10. Youden WJ (1950) Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 3:32–35

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to my clinical teacher, Professor Dr. med. Dr. med. h.c. W. Creutzfeldt, on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Without knowing Bayes' formula he taught me Bayesian thinking in medicine (J.K.)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Köbberling, J., Richter, K. & Tillil, H. The predictive factor — a method to simplify Bayes' formula and its application to diagnostic procedures. Klin Wochenschr 62, 586–592 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01728177

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01728177

Key words

Navigation