This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Ahlgren, A., & Walberg, H. J. (1973). Changing attitudes towards science among adolescents.Nature 245 187–190.
Aikenhead, G. S. (1974). Course evaluation II: Interpretation of student performance on evaluative tests.Journal of Research in Science Teaching 11 23–30.
American Association of Physics Teachers. (1978, December). High school needs assessment completed.AAPT Announcer.8 (4), 33–35.
Bennett, W. J. (1984).To reclaim a legacy: A report on the humanities in higher education. Washington, DC: National Endowment on the Humanities.
Bevilacqua, F., & Kennedy, P. J. (Eds.). (1983).Proceedings of the International Conference on Using History of Physics in Innovatory Physics Education, September 5–9, 1983, Pavia, Italy. Pavia: Centro studi per la Didattica della Facolta de Scienze Matematiche, Fisiche e Naturali, Universita di Pavia.
Bloor, D. (1976).Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bloor, D. (1978). Polyhedra and the abominations of Leviticus.British Journal for the History of Science 11 245–272.
Brush, L. (1979). Avoidance of science and stereotypes of scientists.Journal of Research in Science Teaching 16 237–241.
Brush, S. G. (1969). The role of history in the teaching of physics.Physics Teacher 7 271–280.
Brush, S. G. (1974). Should the history of science be rated X?Science 183 1164–1172.
Brush, S. G. (1979). Comments on “On the distortion of the history of science in science education.”Science Education 63 277–278.
Brush, S. G. (1985). Women in physical science: From drudges to discoverers.Physics Teacher 23 11–19.1.
Brush, S. G. (1987).The history of modern science: A guide to the second scientific revolution, 1800–1950. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
Brush, S. G., & King, A. L. (Eds.). (1972).History in the teaching of physics. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
Butterfield, H. (1931).The Whig interpretation of history. London: Bell.
Butterfield, H. (1944).The Englishman and his history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Butts, D. P. (1982). Science education.Encyclopedia of educational research (5th ed., H. E. Mitzel, Ed.) (pp. 1665–1675). New York: Free Press.
Collins, H. M. (1981). Stages in the empirical programme of relativism.Social Studies of Science 11 3–10.
Commission on Human Resources of the National Research Council. (n.d.). The state of school science: A review of the teaching of mathematics, science and social studies in American schools, and recommendations for improvements. Reprinted inWhat are the needs in precollege science, mathematics and social science education? Views from the field. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation Report SE-80-9.
Crane, L. T. (1975).The National Science Foundation and pre-college science education: 1950–1975. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Dhombres, J. (Ed.). (1981).Actes du Colloque Enseignement de l'histoire des Sciences aux Scientifiques, Nantes 9–10–11, 1980. Paris: Société Français d'Historie des Sciences et des Techniques/Nantes: Université de Nantes.
Donovan, A., et al. (1978, April). The history of science in undergraduate education — Three approaches.Scan: A data bank of scientific research for science faculty in schools and colleges 2 (2), 36–41.
Ehrlich, R. (1977). Factors influencing secondary school enrolments.Physics Teacher 15 490–494.
Feyerabend, P. (1975).Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: Verso.
Finocchiaro, M.A. (Ed.). (1980, September). A symposium on the use of the history of science in the science curriculum.Journal of College Science Teaching,10 (1).
Finocchiaro, M.A., et al. (1982). A symposium on the use of the history in the social sciences in the science curriculum.Journal on the History of the Behavioral Sciences 18 263–289.
Gingerich, O. (1975). “Crisis” versus aesthetic in the Copernican Revolution.Vistas in Astronomy 17 85–93.
Goldberg, S., et al. (1982, June). History of science in the new Liberal Arts curricula.Science, Technology and Society (Lehigh University),30.
Graham, L. (1981, Winter). Why can't history dance contemporary ballet? Or Whig history and the evils of contemporary dance.Science, Technology and Human Values 6 (3), 3–6.
Hegelson, S. L., Blosser, P. E., & Howe, R. W. (1977).The status of pre-college science, mathematics and social science education: 1955–1975. Columbus: Centre for Science and Mathematics Education, Ohio State University.
Hetherington, N. S. (1982, Summer). The history of science and the teaching of science literacy.Journal of Thought 17 (2), 53–66.
Holton, G. (1974). On being caught between Dionysians and Appollonians.Daedalus 103 65–81.
Holton, G. (1978). On the educational philosophy of the Project Physics Course. In G. Holton,The scientific imagination (pp. 294–298). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Home, R. W. (Ed.). (1983).Science under scrutiny: The place of history and philosophy of science. Boston: Reidel.
Hull, D. L. (1979). In defence of presentism.History and Theory 18 1–15.
Jones, R. S. (1986, June 25). Science has become our state religion.Washington Post/Health, p. 6.
Kauffman, G. B. (1979). History in the chemistry curriculum: Pros and cons.Journal of College Science Teaching 36 395–402.
Kockelmans, J. J. (1979). Reflections on Lakatos' methodology of scientific research programs. In G. Radnitzky & G. Anderson (Eds.),The structure and development of science. Boston: Reidel.
Kolata, G. (1983). Math archive in disarray.Science 219 p. 940.
Lehrman, R. L., et al. (1982). Physics texts: An evaluative review.Physics Teacher 20 508–523.
Lingenfeld, P. (1985). A survey of high-school physics teachers in New Jersey.American Journal of Physics 53 1065–1069.
Ogilvie, M. B. (1986).Women in science: Antiquity through the nineteenth century. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Oldroyd, D. R. (1980). Sir Archibald Geikie (1835–1924), geologist, romantic aesthete, and historian of geology: The problem of Whig historiography of history.Annals of Science 37 441–462.
Pallrand, G., & Lingenfeld, P. (1985, November). The physics classroom revisited: Have we learned our lesson?Physics today 38 (11), 46–52.
Pfeiffenberger, G. W. (1975). Letter to Fletcher Watson, November 1974, quoted inProject Physics Newsletter,5.
Porter, D. H. (1981).The emergence of the past: A theory of explanation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Quattropani, D. J. (1978). An evaluation of the effect of Harvard Project Physics on student understanding of the relationships among science, technology, and society. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Robinson, J. D. (1986). Appreciating key experiments.British Journal for the History of Science 19 51–56.
Roll-Hansen, N. (1983). The death of spontaneous generation and the birth of the gene: Two case studies of relativism.Social Studies of Science 13 481–519.
Russell, T. L. (1981). What history of science, How much, and Why?Science Education 65 51–64.
Rutherford, F. J., Holton, G., & Watson, F. G. (n.d.).Project Physics Text, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Shapere, D., et al. (1986, Spring). External and internal factors in the development of science.Science & Technology Studies 4 (1), 1–23.
Siegel, H. (1979). On the distortion of the history of science in science education.Science Education 63 277–278.
Terman, L. M. (1916).The measurement of intelligence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Terman, L. M., & Merrill, M. A. (1937).Measuring intelligence. Cambridge: Riverside Press.
Welch, W. W. (1973). Review of the research and evaluation program of Harvard Project Physics.Journal of Research in Science Teaching 10 365–378.
Welch, W. W. (1979). Twenty years of science curriculum development: A look back.Review of Research in Education 7 282–306.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brush, S.G. History of science and science education. Interchange 20, 60–70 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807048
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807048