Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A constructive look at follow through results

  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Reference Notes

  • Becker, W.C., & Carnine, D.W. Direct Instruction — A behavior-based model for comprehensive educational intervention with the disadvantaged. Paper presented at the VIII Symposium on Behavior Modification, Caracas, Venezuela, February, 1978. Division of Teacher Education, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.

  • Engelmann, S. Direct Instruction. Seminar presentation. AERA, Toronto, March, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Bell, A.E., & Switzer, F. Factors related to pre-school prediction of academic achievement: Beginning reading in open area vs. traditional classroom systems.Manitoba Journal of Education 1973,8, 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A.E., Zipuvsky, M.A., & Switzer, F. Informal or open-area education in relation to achievement and personality.British Journal of Educational Psychology 1977,46, 235–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N.Teaching styles and pupil progress. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J.E., & Good, T.L.Teacher-student relationships: Causes and consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J.Essentials of psychological testing. (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Brothers, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, E.R., Glass, G.V., McLean, L.D., & Walker, D.F. No simple answer: Critique of the “Follow Through” evaluation.Harvard Educational Review 1978a,28(2), 128–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, E.R., Glass, G.V., McLean, L.F., & Walker, D.F. Critiquing a Follow Through evaluation.Phi Delta Kappan 1978b,59(7), 473–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B. Classroom Instruction. InSeventy-fifth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Pierre, R.G., Anderson, R.B., Proper, E.C., & Stebbins, L.B. That Follow Through evaluation.Phi Delta Kappan 1978, 59(10), 729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, J.A., & Kaskowitz, D.H.Follow Through classroom observation evaluation — 1972–1973. Menlo Park, Cal.: Stanford Research Institute, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, J. Implementation and child effects of teaching practices in Follow Through classrooms.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1975,40(7–8, Serial No. 163).

  • Stebbins, L.B., St. Pierre, R.G., Proper, E.C., Anderson, R.B., & Cerva, T.R.A planned variation model. Vol. IV-A Effects of Follow Through models. U.S. Office of Education, 1977.

  • Stephens, J.The process of schooling. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Canada

    Carl Bereiter

  2. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA

    Midian Kurland

Authors
  1. Carl Bereiter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Midian Kurland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bereiter, C., Kurland, M. A constructive look at follow through results. Interchange 12, 1–22 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807392

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807392

Search

Navigation