Abstract
In this paper, a systematic exploration of Michell layouts for various combinations of line supports is continued. The solutions discussed include those for reentrant corners, a line support and two free edges, line supports forming any convex polygon, supports consisting of two symmetric curves, and finally, rectangular domains bounded by one line support and three free edges.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hemp, W.S. 1973:Optimum Structures. Oxford: Clarendon
Hill, R.H.; Rozvany, G.I.N. 1985: Prager's layout theory: a non-numeric computer method for generating optimal structural configurations and weight-influence surfaces.Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 49, 131–148
Michell, A.G.M. 1904: The limits of economy of material in frame-structures.Phil. Mag. 8, 589–597
Prager, W. 1974:Introduction to structural optimization. Vienna: Springer
Rozvany, G.I.N. 1997: Partial relaxation of the orthogonality requirement for classical Michell trusses.Struct. Opt. 13, 271–274
Rozvany, G.I.N.; Gollub, W. 1990: Michell layouts for various combinations of line supports.Int. J. Mech. Sci. 32, 1021–1043
Rozvany, G.I.N.; Hill, R.H. 1978: A computer algorithm for deriving analytically and plotting optimal structural layouts.Comp. & Struct. 10, 295–300
Zhou, M.; Rozvany, G.I.N. 1991: The COC algorithm, Part II: topological, geometrical and generalized shape optimization.Compt. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 89, 309–336
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The material presented in this paper was completed in 1991 but, owing to more urgent research and organizational activities, it was put aside until recently. Due to the relevance of the results to much current work in topology optimization, it was decided to prepare the final text, incorporating the referees' suggestions.
Currently in private consulting practice
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rozvany, G.I.N., Gollub, W. & Zhou, M. Exact Michell layouts for various combinations of line supports — Part II. Structural Optimization 14, 138–149 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01812516
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01812516