Skip to main content
Log in

The meaning and significance of quantum states

  • Part II. Invited Papers Dedicated To Nathan Rosen
  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent investigations have conclusively proved that, because of their collapse, quantum states transform noncovariantly under Lorentz transformations. This result is shown to imply that quantum states do not represent probability distributions for the results of measurements. They represent, rather, perspectives of such probability distributions from the point of view of the frame of reference in which they are given. The ontological status of these “perspectives of potentialities” is discussed. It is conjectured that they propagate from the location of a measurement to the origins of all frames of reference at the speed of light.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Bohr, “Discussions with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics, and Einsten's Reply,” in P. A. Schlipp, ed.,Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1949), Vols. I and II.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen,Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. Rosen, “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?” in P. C. Aichelberg and R. U. Sexl, eds.,Albert Einstein, His Influence on Physics, Philosophy and Politics (Vieweg, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Bohm,Quantum Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1951), Chap. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. S. Bell,Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Aspectet al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. d'Espagnat,Sci. Am. 241, 158 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. Bloch,Phys. Rev. 156, 1377 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Aharonov and D. Z. Albert,Phys. Rev. D21, 3316 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Aharonov and D. Z. Albert,Phys. Rev. D24, 359 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Malin,Phys. Rev. D26, 1330 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  12. I. Prigogine,From Being to Becoming (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. E. Hellwig and K. Kraus,Phys. Rev. D1, 566 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Aharonov and D. Z. Albert,Phys. Rev. D29, 223 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. P. Wigner,Symmetries and Reflections (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1967), pp. 171–184.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Shimony,Am. J. Phys. 31, 755 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  17. I. Bloch,Phys. Rev. D29, 1854 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Malin,Phys. Rev. D29, 1856 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. N. Whitehead,Process and Reality, corrected version, D. R. Griffin and D. W. Sherburne, eds. (Free Press, New York, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  20. N. D. Mermin,Am. J. Phys. 49, 940 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported in part by the Colgate Research Council.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malin, S. The meaning and significance of quantum states. Found Phys 14, 1083–1094 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01882490

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01882490

Keywords

Navigation