Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms in women by a self-administered questionnaire: Test-retest reliability

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A self-administered questionnaire assessing female lower urinary tract symptoms and their impact on quality of life is described and validated, on 56 females in six participating departments. The patients answered two identical questionnaires on separate occasions before treatment. Test-retest reliability of the questionnaire, correlation between the symptoms and their troublesomeness, and the reproducibility of this correlation were assessed. The percentage of mistakes in answers to each of the questions varied from 1.8% to 49.1%, mainly owing to missing answers in the item groups: appliances, sexual function and social activities. Test-retest showed a repeat frequency of 50.0%–91.0% for symptoms and 44.6%–82.1% for trouble. A highly significant positive correlation was found between symptoms and trouble, which was most pronounced for questions concerning pain and incontinence. This correlation was consistent within time. The primary validation of this questionnaire is good. Its relevance as a basis for medical priority and clinical decision making remains to be investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boyarsky S, Jones G, Paulson DF, Prout GR Jr. A new look at bladder neck obstruction by the food and drug administration regulators: guide lines for investigation of benign prostatic hypertrophy.Trans Am Assoc Genitourin Surg 1976;68:29–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mebust WK, Bosch R, Donovan J, Okada K, O'Leary MA, Villers A. Symptom evaluation, quality of life and sexuality. In Cockett ATK et al. (eds). Proceedings, 2nd International Consultation on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). Scientific Communication International Ltd, Jersey, Channel Islands, 1976 pp 129–43.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hald T, Nordling J, Andersen JT, Bilde T, Meyhoff HH, Walter S. A patient weighted symptom score system in the evaluation of uncomplicated benign prostatic hyperplasia.Scand J Urol Nephrol 1991 138: (Suppl) 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wyman JF, Harkins SW, Choi SC, Taylor JR, Fantl A. Psychosocial impact of urinary incontinence in women.Obstet Gynecol 1987;70:378–381.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kelleher CJ, Cardozo LD, Salvatore S, Hill S. Symptom scores and the subjective severity of urinary incontinence.Neurourol Urodyn 1994:13:373–374.

    Google Scholar 

  6. O'Leary MP, Barry M, Fowler FJ. Hard measures of subjective outcomes: validating symptom indexes in urology.J Urol 1992;148:1546–1548.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. SPSS Statistical package for Windows. Release 6.0.

  8. Chronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika 1951;16:297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carmines EG, Zeller RA. Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, McClish D, Fantl A. Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory.Quality of Life Research 1994;3:291–306.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

EDITORIAL COMMENT: The development of well designed methods to track patient outcome to treatment modalities remains paramount. An initial step in this process is the design of validated instruments to measure quality of life and symptom distress. The authors present their initial experience with a constructed self-administered patient questionnaire. While this instrument is still in the testing phase (lacking the necessary sample size and necessary validation), and is far from perfect, it represents the necessary groundwork through which all researchers interested in this field of study must progress. Hopefully others attempting to design similar questionnaires will learn from their experience.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bernstein, I., Sejr, T., Able, I. et al. Assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms in women by a self-administered questionnaire: Test-retest reliability. Int Urogynecol J 7, 37–47 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01895104

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01895104

Keywords

Navigation