Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of pelvic floor function: A series of simple tests in nulliparous women

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess normal ranges, variations, test-retest reliability and correlations between tests for a battery of simple, minimally invasive tests of pelvic floor function in nulliparous asymptomatic women. Women were recruited by advertisement and underwent dipstick urinalysis, simple cystometrics, provocative tests for incontinence, Q-tip test and surface electromyography with acrylic plug electrodes. Subjects were retested at a later date. Nineteen subjects underwent initial testing and 12 were retested. A wide range of normal values was obtained. Cystometric measures of first and strong urge to void the maximum bladder capacity, Q-tip test and rectal perineometry had significant correlations between the two visits. There were no significant between-test correlation coefficients. It was concluded that the simple tests used demonstrate a mixed ability to follow pelvic floor function longitudinally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ouslander WG, Leach GE, Staskin DR. Simplified tests of lower urinary tract function in the evaluation of geriatric urinary incontinence.J Am Geriatr Soc 1989;37:706–714

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Identifying and evaluating urinary incontinence: recommendations in clinical practice.Urinary Incontinence in Adults. US Department of Health and Human Services — Public Health Service ANCPR Pub. No. 92-0038. Rockville, MD, 1992;13–21

  3. Koelbl H, Bernaschek G. A new method for sonographic urethrocystography and simultaneous pressure-flow measurements.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;74:417–421

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fischer-Rasmussen W, Hansen RI, Stage P. Predictive values of diagnostic tests in the evaluation of female urinary stress incontinence.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1096;65:291–296

    Google Scholar 

  5. Karram MM, Bhatia NW. The Q-tip test: standardization of the technique and its interpretation in women with urinary incontinence.Obstet Gynecol 1988;71:807–812

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thorp JM Jr, Bowes WA Jr, Droegemueller W, Wicker H. Assessment of perineal floor function: electromyography with acrylic plug surface electrodes in nulliparous women.Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:89–92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thorp JM Jr, Bowes WA Jr, Brame RG, Cefalo RC. Selected use of midline episiotomy: effect on perineal trauma.Obstet Gynecol 1987;70:260–262

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Thorp JM Jr, Bowes, WA Jr. Episiotomy: can we defend its routine use?Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:1027

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thorp JM Jr, Jones LG, Bowes WA Jr, Droegemueller W. Electromyography with acrylic plug surface electrodes after delivery.Am J Perinatol 1995;12:125–128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bates P, Glen E, Grifiths D et al. First report on the standardization of terminology of the lower urinary tract function. Urinary incontinence. Procedures related to the evaluation of urine storage: cystometry, urethral closure pressuer profile, units of measurement.Br J Urol 1976;48:39;Eur Urcl 1976;2:274;Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976;11:193;Urol Int 1976;32:81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bates P, Glen E, Griffiths D et al. Second report on the standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Procedures related to the evaluation of micturition: flow rate, pressure measurement, symbolsActa Urol Jpn 1977;27:1563;Br J Urol 1977;49:207;Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1977;11:1977

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bates P, Bradley WE, Glen E et al. Third report of the standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Procedures related to the evaluation of micturition: Pressure flow relationships, residual urine.Br J Urol 1980;52:348;Eur Urol 1980;6:170;Acta Urol Jpn 1980;27:1566;Scand J Urol Nephrol 1980;12:191

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bates P, Bradley WE, Glen E et al. Fourth report of the standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Terminology related to neuromuscular dysfunction of lower urinary tract.Br J Urol 1981;52:333;Urology 1981;17:618;Scand J Urol Nephrol 1981;15:169;Acta Urol Jpn 1981;27:1568

    Google Scholar 

  14. Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Stanton SL etal. Sixth report of the standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Procedures related to neurophysiological investigations: electromyography, nerve conduction studies, reflex latencies, evoked potentials and sensory testing.World J Urol 1986;4:2;Scand J Urol Nephrol 1986;20:161

    Google Scholar 

  15. Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Stanton SL et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function.Scand J Urol Nephrol 1988;114(Suppl):5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Editorial Comment: This study attempts to assess the normal ranges and reproducibility of a series of minimally invasive clinical tests commonly used to measure pelvic floor function. The second goal of the study is to determine whether there is any correlation among these tests. Nineteen nulliparous asymptomatic women underwent a battery of tests, including postvoid residual, simple cystometry, translabial sonography, Q-tip test, stress test and electromyography; 12 of the women repeated the tests at a later date. The investigators found a wide range of values, large standard deviations and poor correlation on test-retest in most of the tests performed. Furthermore, no correlation between the tests could be found. The study is severely limited by its small population size, a key ingredient when trying to assess normal values of specific tests or parameters. However, the failure to detect a significant correlation between the different tests of pelvic floor function, in spite of the small numbers, is interesting. Again, the complexity of pelvic floor function is clearly evident-assessment of the pelvic floor requires a variety of tests to obtain a clear picture of normal versus abnormal function.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thorp, J.M., Jones, L.H., Wells, E. et al. Assessment of pelvic floor function: A series of simple tests in nulliparous women. Int Urogynecol J 7, 94–97 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01902380

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01902380

Keywords

Navigation