Skip to main content
Log in

Growth-promoting-Effekt von einigen fluoreszierendenPseudomonas-Isolaten auf Gurken (Cucumis sativus)

Growth-promoting effect of some isolates of fluorescent pseudomonas on Cucumber (Cucumis sativus)

  • Published:
Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde, Pflanzenschutz, Umweltschutz Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

209 isolates of fluorescent pseudomonas, which showed antagonismin vitro againstRhizoctonia solani andPythium aphanidermatum, were investigated for their ability to influence the growth of cucumber. Among them 155 isolates showed a positive effect on the sproutweight of cucumber. Even 7Pseudonomas-isolates reduced the sproutweight between 20 and 50%. Eleven isolates caused an increase of 30 to 50% of the sproutweight as compared with the untreated control.

Zusammenfassung

209 Isolate von fluoreszierenden Pseudomonaden, die sich als Antagonistenin vitro gegenüberRhizoctonia solani undPythium aphanidermatum erwiesen haben, wurden hinsichtlich ihrer Wachstumsbeeinflussung bei Gurken untersucht. Von diesen Isolaten hatten 155 einen positiven Einfluß auf das Sproßgewicht. SiebenPseudomonas-Isolate reduzierten das Sproßgewicht zwischen 20 und 50%, 11 Isolate verursachten eine Sproßgewichtszunahme von 30 bis 50%, verglichen mit der unbehandelten Kontrolle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Broadbent, P., K. F. Baker, Y. Waterworth (1971): Bacteria and actinomycetes antagonistic to fungal root pathogens in australien soils. Aust. J. Biol. Sci.24, 975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E. (1972): Plant growth substances produced by microorganisms of soil and rhizosphere. J. appl. Bacteriol.35, 443–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., J. E. Beringer (1983): The potential of antagonists for fungal control. Agric. Ecosyst. and Envir.10, 127–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., S. K. Burlington (1968): Production of plant growth substances byAzotobacter chroococcum. J. Gen. Microbiol.53, 135–144.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, U., R. P. Purkayastha (1984): Role of rhizobitoxine in protection soybean roots fromMacrophominia phaseolina infection. Can. J. Microbiol.30, 285–289.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eklund, E. (1970): Secondary effects of some pseudomonads in the rhizoplane of peat grown cucumber plants. Acta Agric. Scand. Suppl.17, 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardson, B., S. Alstrom, B. Ramert (1985): Plant reactions to inoculations of roots with fungi and bacteria. Phytapathol. Z.114, 108–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, P. R., G. J. Warren (1988): An iron-antagonized fungistatic agent that is not required for iron assimilation from a fluorescent rhizoshere pseudomonad. J. Bacteriol.170, 163–170.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hata, K. (1962): Studies on plant growth accelerating substances. Part I. The isolation method of soil microbes which produce plant growth accelerating substances.. Agric. Biol. Chem.26, 278–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, A., V. Vancura (1970): Formation of biologically active substances by rhizosphere bacteria and their effect on plant growth. Folia Microbiol. Prague11, 468–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, A. (1972): Biological control of crown gall: seed inoculation. J. Appl. Bacteriol.35, 493–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, E., M. K. Ward, D. E. Raney (1954): Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocanin and fluorescin. J. Lab. Clin Med.44, 301–307.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper, J. W., D. J. Hume, F. M. Scher, C. Singleton, B. Tipping, M. Laliberte, T. Frauley, C. Kuutchaw, C. Simonson, R. Lifshitz, I. Zaleska, L. Lee (1988): Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on canola (rapeseed). Plant Dis.72, 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper, J. W., M. N. Schroth (1978): Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on radishes. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Plant Path. Bacteria2, 879–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper, J. W., M. N. Schroth, T. D. Miller (1980): Effects of rhizosphere colonization by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on potato plant development and yield. Phytopathol.70, 1078–1082.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippert, E., P. Silhengst (1970): Interactions between plants and epiphytic bacteria regarding their auxin metabolism VIII. Transfer of 14C-indoleacetic acid from epiphytic bacteria to corn coleoptiles. Physiol. Plant23, 480–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriman, J. M., R. D. Price, J. F. Kollmorgan, T. Piggott, E. H. Ridge (1974): Effect of seed inoculation withBacillus subtilis andStreptomyces griseus on growth of cereals and carrots. Aust. J. Agric. Res.25, 219–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, A. H., P. E. Nelson (1972): Antagonistic effect of soil bacteria onFusarium roseum ‘culmorum’ from carnation. Phytopathol.62, 1053–1056.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schippers, B. (1983): Prospects of biological control of plant pathogens with fluorescentPseudomonas spp. Proc. 10th Int. Congr. Pl. Prot., 767–771.

  • Sneh, B. (1981): Use of rhizosphere chitinolytic bacteria for biological control ofFusarium oxysporum F. sp.dianthi in carnation. Phytopathol Z.100, 251–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suslow, T. V. (1980): Increased growth and yield of sugar beets by seed treatment with selectedPseudomonas spp. and bacterial culture preservation in frozen or dry film of cellulose methyl ether. Ph. D. thesis, Uni. of California, Berkely.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suslow, T. V., J. Kloepper, M. N. Schroth, T. Burr (1979): Beneficial bacteria enhance plant growth. Calif Agric.33, 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suslow, T. V., M. N. Schroth (1982a): Role of deleteriius rhizobacteria as minor pathogens in reducing crop growth. Phytopathol.72, 111–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suslow, T. V., M. N. Schroth (1982b): Rhizobacteria of sugarbeets: Effects of seed application and root colonization on yield. Phytopathol.72, 199–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomashow, L. S., D. H. Weller (1988): Role of a phenazine antibiotic fromPseudomonas fluorescens in biological control ofGaeumannomyces graminis var.tritici. J. Bacteriol.170, 3499–3508.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomashow, L. S., D. M. Weller, R. F. Bonsall, L. S. Pierson (1990): Production of the antibiotic phenazine-1-carboxylic acid by fluorescentPseudomonas spp. in the rhizosphere of wheat. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.56, 908–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voisard, C., C. Keel, D. Haas, G. Defago (1989): Cyanide production byPseudomonas fluorescens helps suppress black root of tobacco under gnotobiotic conditions. EMO J.8, 351–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner D. (1987): Pflanzliche und mikrobielle Symbiosen. Stuttgart/New York: G. Thieme Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wölk, M., S. Sarkar (1993a): Antagonismusin vitro von fluoreszierenden Pseudomonaden gegenüberRhizoctonia solani undPythium aphanidermatum. Zentralbl. Mikrobiol.148, 237–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wölk, M., S. Sarkar (1994b): Antagonismusin vitro vonBacillus spp. gegenüberRhizoctonia solani undPythium spp. Anz. Schädlingskde., Pflanzenschutz, Umweltschutz. 1994;67:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wölk, M., S. Sarkar (1993c): Ein verbessertes Selektivmedium zur Isolation von fluoreszierenden Pseudomonaden. Zentralbl. Mikrobiol148, 88–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuen, G. Y., M. N. Schroth, A. H. McCain. (1985): Reduction ofFusarium wilt of carnations with suppressive soils and antagonistic bacteria. Plant Dis69, 1071–1075.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Mit 1 Abbildung

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wölk, M., Sarkar, S. Growth-promoting-Effekt von einigen fluoreszierendenPseudomonas-Isolaten auf Gurken (Cucumis sativus). Anz. Schadlingskde., Pflanzenschutz, Umweltschutz 67, 101–103 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01904699

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01904699

Navigation