Skip to main content
Log in

An elementary entropy-maximizing model of urban consumers

  • Policy Issues
  • Published:
Papers of the Regional Science Association

Conclusions

This paper has explored an elementary model of the location and allocation problems of the urban consumer. The model is predicated upon the assumptions that average incomes, spending on land and spending on transport are given, that consumers exactly spend their incomes, and that the price of land serves to equate the supply of and demand for land at each location. Detailed consequences of these assumptions are explored for a city with simple structure, although the method of analyzing more complex environments is also shown. Considering the simplicty of the assumptions, the model predicts quite complex behavior, as is evidenced by the relations between income and location. Many of the predictions of the model are intuitively reasonable, though, some predictions indicate that parts of the model need to be revised. In many respects, this model serves to provide an alternative route to the predictions which are made by economic urban models, a route which is more general than that followed by economic models in the sense that no assumptions are made concerning individual preferences and that the probability distributions which are obtained depend upon the geometry of the city (which need not therefore comprise a single center on a homogeneous plain).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alonso, W.Location and Land Use. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beckmann, M. J.: “On the Distribution of Urban Rent and Residential Density,”Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 1 (1969), pp. 60–68.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bussière, R., and F. Snickars “Derivation of the Negative Exponential Model by an Entropy Maximizing Method,”Environment and Planning, Vol. 2 (1970), pp. 295–301.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Casetti, E. “Spatial Equilibrium in an Ideal Urban Setting with Pareto Distributed Incomes,” in E. Cripps, ed.,Proceedings of the Annals of Regional Science. London: Pion, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eastin, R. V., and P. Shapiro, “The Design of a Location Experiment,”Transportation Research, Vol. 7 (1973), pp. 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  6. “The Design of a Location Experiment: A Continuous Formulation,”Transportation Research, Vol. 7 (1973), pp. 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mills, E. S. “An Aggregative, Model of Resource Allocation in a Metropolitan Area,”American Economic Review, Vol. 57 (1967), pp. 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  8. , and D. M. de Ferranti. “Market Choices and Optimum City Size,”American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 61 (1971), pp. 340–345.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mirrlees, J. A. “The Optimum Town”,Swedish Journal of Economics, Vol. 74 (1972), pp. 114–135.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Muth, R. F.Cities and Housing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  11. “Moving Costs and Housing Expenditures,”Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 1 (1974), pp. 108–125.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ontario Statistics. Toronto: Ministry of Treasury Economics, and Intergovernmental Affairs, 1976.

  13. Papageorgiou, G. J. “The Population Density and Rent Distribution Model within a Multicentre Framework”,Environment and Planning, Vol. 3 (1971), pp. 267–282.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Papageorgiou, G. J. “Spatial Equilibrium within a Hierarchy of Centers with Distributed Incomes,” paper presented at the 13th European Congress of the Regional Science Association, Vienna, 1973.

  15. Senior, M. L., and A. G. Wilson, “Disaggregated, Residential Location Models: Some Tests and Further Theoretical Developments”, Department of Geography, Working Paper No. 22, University of Leeds, 1973.

  16. Senior, M. L. “Explorations and Synthesis of Linear Programming and Spatial Interaction Models of Residential Location,” Department of Geography, Working Paper No. 43, University of Leeds, 1973.

  17. Solow, R. M., and W. S. Vickrey. “Land Use in a Long Narrow City”,Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 3 (1971), pp. 430–447.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tribus, M.Rational Descriptions, Decisions and Designs. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Webber, M. J. “Entropy Maximising Models for Nonindependent Events”,Environment and Planning A, Vol. 7 (1975), pp. 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  20. “Elementary Entropy Maximising Probability Distributions: Analysis and Interpretation”,Economic Geography, Vol. 52 (1976), pp. 218–227.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wilson, A. G. “A Statistical Theory of Spatial Trip Distribution Models”,Transportation Research, Vol. 1 (1967), pp. 253–269.

    Google Scholar 

  22. “The Use of Entropy Maximising Models in the Theory of Trip Distribution, Mode Split and Route Split”,Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 3 (1969), pp. 79–85.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

McMaster University

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Webber, M.J. An elementary entropy-maximizing model of urban consumers. Papers of the Regional Science Association 39, 251–271 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01936217

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01936217

Keywords

Navigation