Summary
A residual influence of males and females on oviposition has been examined in 7 drosophilids. There was evidence for oviposition deterrence inDrosophila funebris, with males as well as females producing the inhibitory effect. In contrast, male residues stimulated oviposition inZaprionus tuberculatus. Male residues also stimulated oviposition and appeared to serve as an aggregation cue inD. melanogaster.
Literatur
Mainardi, M., Boll. Zool.35 (1968) 135.
Mainardi, M., Boll. Zool.36 (1969) 101.
Hoffmann, A.A., and Harshman, L. G., Evolution39 (1985) 638.
Turner, M.E., and Anderson, W.W., Evolution37 (1984) 714.
Birch, M. C., in: Chemical Ecology of Insects, p. 331. Sinauer, Massachusetts 1984.
Prokopy, R. J., Roitberg, B. D., and Averill, A. L., in: Chemical Ecology of Insects, p. 301. Sinauer, Massachusetts 1984.
Atkinson, W. D., and Shorrocks, B., J. Anim. Ecol.50 (1981) 461.
Spence, G. E., Hoffmann, A. A., and Parsons, P. A., Experientia40 (1984) 763.
Bartelt, R. J., and Jackson, L. L., Ann. ent. Soc. Am.77 (1984) 364.
Bronson, F. H., Biol. Reprod.1 (1971) 344.
Aron, C., Physiol. Rev.59 (1979) 229.
Salt, G., Proc. Roy. Soc. London. Ser. B.122 (1937) 57.
Prokopy, R.J., in: Management of Insect Pests with Semiochemicals, p. 477. Plenum Press, New York 1981.
Prokopy, R.J., in: Semiochemicals: Their Role in Pest Control, p. 181. Wiley Press, New York 1981.
Mitchell, R., Ecology56 (1975) 696.
Giga, P. P., and Smith, R. H., J. appl. Ecol.18 (1981) 755.
Oshima, K., Honda, H., and Yamamoto, I., Agric. biol. Chem.37 (1973) 2679.
Wasserman, S. S., Ann. ent. Soc. Am.74 (1981) 242.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harshman, L.G., Hoffmann, A.A. Residual influences on fecundity in drosophilid species. Experientia 43, 213–215 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01942858
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01942858