Abstract
An appropriate delimitation of scientific subfields constitutes one of the key problems in bibliometrics. Several methods have been explored for this task. The main ones are co-citation analysis, co-word analysis, the use of indexing systems based on controlled or uncontrolled keywords, and finally the use of a classification of scientific journals into subfields or categories. In our contribution we will explore a new method, which is based on cognitive words from addresses (corporate sources) in scientific publications. Cognitive address words are words referring to scientific (sub)fields, methods or objects of research, that appear in the institutional affiliations of the publishing authors (e.g., ‘Department of Pharmacology’, AIDS Research Center’). We will focus on theScience Citation Index (SCI), published by the Institute for Scientific Information. Our methods will be applied to a multidisciplinary set of articles extracted from the journalsScience andNature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
For a recent overview see:R.R. Braam,Mapping of Science: Foci of Interest in Scientific Literature, Thesis, DSWO Press, Leiden, 1991.
H.G. Small, B.C. Griffith: The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties,Science Studies, 4 (1974) 17–40.
M. Callon, J.P. Courtial, W.A. Turner, S. Bauin: From translations to problematic networks: An Introduction to Co-word Analysis,Social Science Information, 22 (1983) 191–235.
R.J.W. Tijssen, T.N. Van Leeuwen, A.F.J. Van Raan: Energy Research in the Netherlands in a Broad Perspective (1984–1989): An Explanatory Study Based on Bibliometric Data. Part I: Publication Output, International visibility, Interdisciplinarity. Research Report for the Ministry of Education and Science, CWTS-89-01, Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden, 1989.
E. Noma:Subject Classification and Influence Weights for 3,000 Journals, Computer Horizons Inc., Cherry Hill NJ, 1986.
See for instance:R.R. Braam, H.F. Moed, A.F.J. Van Raan: Mapping of science by combined cocitation and co-word analysis I: Structural aspects,Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 42 (1991) No. 4, 233–251.
H.G. Small: The significance of bibliographic references,Scientometrics, 12 (1987) 339–341.
R.R. Braam, J. Bruil: Quality of Indexing Information: Authors' views on indexing of their articles in Chemical Abstract's Online CAS file,Journal of Information Science, 18 (1992) No. 5, 399–409.
H.F. Moed:Publication Activity and Internationality of Dutch Research in the Natural and Life Sciences (1984–1987), Centre for Studies of Science and Technology, Leiden, 1988.
A.J. Nederhof, E.C.M. Noyons:Trends in Publication Activity and International Co-publication in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, and the Humanities (1984–1989), Centre for Studies of Science and Technology, Leiden, 1990.
R.E. De Bruin, H.F. Moed: The unification of addresses in scientific publications, In:L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (Eds),Informetrics 1989/90, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1990.
International Handbook of Universities and Other Institutes of Higher Education, 11th ed.: MacMillan, New York, 1989.
H.F. Moed: The use of online databases for bibliometric analysis, In:L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (Eds),Informetrics 1987/88, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1988.
For a description of the principles of the clustering routine, see Ref. 6..
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Bruin, R.E., Moed, H.F. Delimitation of scientific subfields using cognitive words from corporate addresses in scientific publications. Scientometrics 26, 65–80 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016793
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016793