Skip to main content
Log in

Microspatial heterogeneity in the distribution of ciliates in a small pond

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Five transects of contiguous samples from the surface of a small pond and one transect from its bottom were collected in order to quantify microspatial heterogeneity in the distribution of ciliated protozoa. Examination of the frequency-abundance relations for these transects suggests that they can be approximated by negative binomial distributions with a commonk of 1.87. Contagiousness or crowding increases with population density.

Mean patch size and mean interpatch distance were measured for 4 transects as 1.5 to 2 cm and 3 to 4 cm, respectively. This heterogeneity is suggested to arise from behavioral aggregation about discrete food sources and be very ephemeral.

Blocking of adjacent contiguous samples was used to investigate the effect of sample size on the apparent correlation between the numbers of pairs of taxa. In all cases examined, taxa were relatively independent in their distribution at small sample sizes and became more negatively or positively associated as samples were combined. This may reflect that the small scale patches are essentially monospecific.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Box, G. E. P., and J. M. Jenkins: Time Series Analysis-Forecasting and Control, Rev. ed. Holden-Day, San Francisco (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cairns, J., Jr., J. A. Ruthven, and R. L. Kaesler: Distribution of protozoa in a small stream. Am. Midl. Nat.92, 406–414 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cairns, J., Jr., and W. H. Yongue, Jr.: The distribution of protozoa on a relatively homogeneous substrate. Hydrobiologia31, 65–72 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cassie, R. M.: Microdistribution of the plankton. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol.1, 223–252 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hammer, W. M., and J. H. Carlton: Copepod swarms: attributes and role in coral reef ecosystems. Limnol. Oceanogr.24, 1–14(1979)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Iwao, S., and E. Kuno: An approach to the analysis of aggregation pattern in biological populations. In G. P. Patil, E. C. Pielou, and W. E. Waters (eds.): Spatial Patterns and Statistical Distributions. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, Pa. (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lewis, W. M., Jr.: Comparison of temporal and spatial variation in the Zooplankton of a lake by means of variance components. Ecology59, 666–671 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lloyd, M.: “Mean crowding”. J. Anim. Ecol.36, 1–30 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maguire, B., Jr.: The passive dispersal of small aquatic organisms and their colonization of isolated bodies of water. Ecol. Monogr.33, 161–185 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pielou, E. C.: Mathematical Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Taylor, W. D.: Maximum growth rate, size and commònness in a community of bactivorous ciliates. Oecologia (Berl.)36, 263–272 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Taylor, W. D.: Sampling data on the bactivorous ciliates of a small pond compared to neutral models of community structure. Ecology60 (in press)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, W.D., Berger, J. Microspatial heterogeneity in the distribution of ciliates in a small pond. Microb Ecol 6, 27–34 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020372

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020372

Keywords

Navigation