Skip to main content
Log in

Power indices for political and financial decision making: A review

  • Section IV Group Decision Making Through Voting
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The most important power indices are presented. The effectiveness of these indicators is discussed with reference to description of political and financial events. Some recent studies and applications are shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Ameljańczyk, J. Hołubiec and S. Piasecki, Compromise solution of multiperson cooperative game and its application to international energy cooperation, in:Large Scale Systems: Theory and Applications, Proc IFAC/IFORS Symp. (Pergamon, Oxford, New York, 1984) pp. 571–575.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Amihud and A. Barnea, Portfolio selection for managerial control, Omega 2(1974)775–783.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Arcaini and G. Gambarelli, Algorithm for automatic computation of the power variations in share tradings, Calcolo 23(1986)13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.J. Aumann and L.S. Shapley,Values of Non-Atomic Games (Princeton University Press, 1974).

  5. J.F. Banzhaf, Weighted voting doesn't work: a mathematical analysis, Rutgers Law Rev. 19(1965)317–343.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Batteau, Approches formelles du problème du control des firmes et sociétés par actions, Revue de l'Association Française de Finance 1(1980)1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Carreras and G. Owen, Evaluation of the Catalonian parliament 1980–1984, Math. Social Sci. 15(1988)87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.S. Coleman, Control of collectivities and the power of collectivity to act, in:Social Choice, ed. Lieberman (1971).

  9. J. Deegan and E.W. Packel, A new index of power for simplen-person games, Int. J. Game Theory 7(1978)113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Deegan and E.W. Packel, An axiomated family of power indices for simplen-person games, Public Choice 35(1980)229–239.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Dubey, Some results on values of finite and infinite games, Tech. Rep., Center of Applied Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Dubey, On the uniqueness of the Shapley value, Int. J. Game Theory 4(1975)131–139.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Gambarelli, Algorithm for automatic computation of the Shapley value of a game, Riv. di Statistica Applicata 13(1980)35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. Gambarelli, Evaluation of political elections, in:Mathematical Programming and its Economic Applications, Proc. Int. Symp., Venice (Angeli, Milano, 1981) pp. 687–698.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Gambarelli, Portfolio selection and firms' control, Finance 3(1982)69–83, or 8th Annual Meeting of the European Finance Association, EFA, Scheveningen (NL).

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. Gambarelli, Common behaviour of power indices, Int. J. Game Theory 12(1983)237–244.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. Gambarelli, A new approach to evaluating the Shapley value, Optimization 21(1989)445–452.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. Gambarelli, Survival game: a dynamic approach ton-person bargaining,13th Int. Symp. on Mathematical Programming, Tokyo (1989).

  19. G. Gambarelli, Political and financial applications of the power indices, in:Decision Processes in Economics, ed. G. Ricci (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 1991) pp. 84–106.

    Google Scholar 

  20. G. Gambarelli, J. Hołubiec and J. Kacprzyk, Modeling and optimization of international economic cooperation via fuzzy mathematical programming and cooperative games, Control Cybern. 17(1989)325–335.

    Google Scholar 

  21. G. Gambarelli and G. Owen, Indirect control of corporations (1994), forthcoming.

  22. G. Gambarelli and G.P. Szegö, Discontinuous solutions inn-person games, in:New Quantitative Techniques for Economic Analysis, ed. G.P. Szegö (Academic Press, New York, 1982) pp. 229–244.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M.J. Holler,Power, Voting and Voting Power (Physica Verlag, 1982).

  24. M.J. Holler and E.W. Packel, Power, luck and the right index, Zeits. National Ökonomie 43(1983)21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Lemaire, A new value for games without transferable utilities, Int. J. Game Theory 3(1974)205–213.

    Google Scholar 

  26. W.F. Lucas, Measuring power in weighted voting systems, in:Case Studies in Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Association of America, Department of Mathematics, California State University, Hayward (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  27. I. Mann and L.S. Shapley, Values of large games, VI: Evaluating the electoral college exactly, Rand Corporation, Memorandum RM 3158, Santa Monica, CA (1962).

  28. J.W. Milnor and L.S. Shapley, Values of large games, II: Oceanic games, Rand Corporation, RM 2646, Santa Monica, CA (1961).

  29. R.B. Myerson, Graphs and cooperation in games, Math. Oper Res. 2(1977)225–229.

    Google Scholar 

  30. H. Nurmi,Comparing Voting Systems (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  31. G. Owen,Values of Games with A Priori Unions, Lecture Notes in Economical and Mathematical Systems 141 (1977) pp. 76–88.

    Google Scholar 

  32. G. Owen, Characterization of the Banzhaf—Coleman index, Siam J. Appl. Math. 35(1978).

  33. G. Owen, Modification of the Banzhaf—Coleman index for games with a priori unions, inPower, Voting and Voting Power, ed. M.J. Holler (Physica, Würzburg, Germany, 1981) pp. 232–238.

    Google Scholar 

  34. G. Owen,Game Theory, 2nd ed. (Academic Press, New York, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  35. F. Pressacco, Arbitraggi bilanciati per giochi omogenei di maggioranza ponderata, Riv. di Matematica per le Scienze Economiche e Sociali (Milano) 1(1978)55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  36. G. Ragazzi, On the relation between ownership dispersion and the firm's market value, J. Banking Fin. 5(1981)261–276.

    Google Scholar 

  37. K. Rydqvist, The pricing of shares with different voting power and the theory of oceanic games, Stockholm School of Economics 4(1985)1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  38. E. Sagonti, On the strong monotonicity of power indices, Int. J. Game Theory 20(1991)13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  39. N.Z. Shapiro and L.S. Shapley, Values of large games. I: A limit theorem, Rand Corporation, RM 2646, Santa Monica, CA (1960).

  40. L.S. Shapley, A value forn-person games, in:H.W. Kuhn and A.W. Tucker, Contributions to the Theory of Games, Vol. 2 (Princeton University Press, 1953) pp. 307–317.

  41. L.S. Shapley and M. Shubik, A method for evaluating the distributions of power in a committee system, Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 48(1954)787–792.

    Google Scholar 

  42. G.P. Szegö,Portfolio Theory (Academic Press, New York, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  43. S.H. Tijs, Bounds for the core and the T-value, in:Game Theory and Mathematical Economics, ed. O. Moeschlin and D. Pallaschke (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981) pp. 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  44. J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern,The Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour (Princeton University Press, NJ, 1944).

    Google Scholar 

  45. S.K. Zhang, ZS-value for random coalition games, Chinese Sci. Bull. 34(1980)1236–1242.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gambarelli, G. Power indices for political and financial decision making: A review. Ann Oper Res 51, 163–173 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02032761

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02032761

Keywords

Navigation