Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dialectics of historical development of national and world literature

  • Déuxième Demi-Journée le 17 Novembre 1971 Après-Midi IIe Sujet La Zone Littéraire Séance Présidée par istván Sőtér
  • Published:
Neohelicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Лихачев, Д. С.: Древнеславянские литертуры как система; Робинсон, А. Н.: Литература Киевской Руси среди европейских средневековых литератур (типология, оригинальность, метод). — В кн. Славянские литературы. VI Международный съезд славистов (Прага, 1968). Доклады советской делегации. Москва, Наука, 1968.

  2. Никольский, С. В., Соколов, А. Н. и Стахеев, Б. Ф.: О ромахтизме в славянских литературах. Москва, Издателъство АН СССР, 1958; Георгиев, Е.: Общо и сравнително славянско литературозвание. София, Наука и изкуство, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Марков, Д. Ф.: Генезис социалистического реализма. Из опыта южнославянских и западнославянских литератур. Москва, Наука, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  4. История советской многонациональной литературы. Москва, Наука, Vol. 1, 1970; Vol. 2, 1971; Ломидзе, Г. И.: Интернациональный пафос советской литературы. Москва, Советский писатель, 1970.

  5. Henriquez Ureña P.: Las corrientes literarias en la América hispana. México, 1954; Crawford, W.: A Century of Latin-American Thought. Cambridge (Mass.), 1961; Harss, L.: Into the Main Stream. London, 1967; Franco, J.: The Modern Culture of Latin America: Society and the Artist. Austin-London, 1967; Формирование национальных литератур Латинской Америки. Москва, Наука, 1970.

  6. Nagendra, D.: Indian Literature. Agra, 1959; Da. Prabhakar Mathve: Bharat aur Ashia ka sahitya. Aimar, Times Printing Press, 1967.

  7. Here we do not touch on the differences between the methodological approaches to historical and literary synthesis which are especially apparent in works on the history of world literature. On this subject see in the book: Современные Буржуазные концепции истории всемирной литературы. Москва, Наука, 1967. On the metodological principles for the structure of a History of World Literature, on which Soviet scholars are working now, see: Неупокоева, И. Г.: Методологические вопросы построения. Истории всемирной литературы. Вестник Академии наук СССР, 1965, №. 7; Neupokoeva, I.: The Comparative Aspects in the “History of World Literature”. In: Proceedings of the V-th Congress of International Comparative Literature Association. Amsterdam, 1969.

  8. Конрад, Н. И.: Запад и Восток. Москва, Главная редакция восточной литературы, 1966, p. 448. Translations of this work: Conrad, N. I.: West-East. The Inseparable Twins. Moscow, Nauka, 1967; Konrad, N. I.: Toyo to Seiyo. Tokyo, Rironsha, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  9. One such tradition common to the European literatures is traced by E. R. Curtius, in: Europäische Literatur und lateinisches Mittelalter. Bern, 1948.

  10. Abundant material on this subject is provided by the International Slavistic Congresses. See also the documents of the Budapest Conference of scientists of the socialist countries on the comparative study of literature. Acta Litteraria Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, Budapest, Vol. V (1962).

  11. A most fruitful setting of the problem of the various tasks and, accordingly, methods of comparative study is given by M.B. Chrapčenko: There are various “levels”, as it is agreed to call them today, of typological study. Besides the typology of literary trends, the typology of genres is also of great significance. For a long time, especially in art criticism, there has been intense development of the typology of style. Of extreme interest and great importance is the typology of historical literary development—the elucidation of species, types, in the literary process of the different historical periods among the peoples of different countries ... For example, the typology of literary trends naturally touches upon questions concerning not only their species, how they appeared in the history of world literature, but also the types, say, of romanticism or realism, including the national types of these literary trends. (Typological Study of Literature. In: М. Б. Храпченко: Творческая индивидуальность писателя и развитие литературы. Москва, Советский писатель, 1970, p. 257.) See also: M.B. Chrapčenko: Typologische Literaturforschung und ihre Prinzipien. In: Aktuelle Probleme der vergleichenden Literaturforschung. Berlin, Akademie-Verlag, 1968; Soveto bungaku. Tokyo, 1968, n. 9–10.

  12. A considerable contribution to this field of comparative research has been made by the well-known Soviet scholars N. I. Konrad and V. M. Zhirmunsky.

  13. Сучков, Б.: Исторические судьбы реализма. Москва, Советский писатель, 1970; Soutchkov, B.: Les destinées historiques du réalisme. Moscou, Edition du Progrès, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See, for example: Типология и взаимосвязи литератур древнет о мира. Москва, Наука, 1971.

Download references

Authors
  1. Irina Neupokoeva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neupokoeva, I. Dialectics of historical development of national and world literature. Neohelicon 1, 113–130 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02039238

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02039238

Keywords

Search

Navigation