Skip to main content
Log in

Why are predator urines aversive to prey?

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Predator odors often repel prey species. In the present experiments, we investigated whether changes in the diet of a predator, the coyote (Canis latrans) would affect the repellency of its urine. Furthermore, because predator odors have a high sulfur content, reflecting large amounts of meat in the diet, we investigated the contribution of sulfurous odors to repellency. Our results were consistent with the hypothesis that diet composition and sulfurous metabolites of meat digestion are important for the repellency of predator odors to potential prey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, D.H., Baines, D.A., Faulkes, C.G., Jennens, D.C., Ning, P.C.Y.K., andTomlinson, A.J. 1990. A natural deer repellent: chemistry and behavior, pp. 599–609,in D.W. Macdonald, D. Muller-Schwarze, and S.E. Natynczuk (eds.). Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 5. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, R.W., Turkowski, F.J., andKilburn, S.R. 1983. Responses of free-ranging coyotes to lures and their modifications.J. Chem. Ecol. 9:877–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickman, C.R., andDoncaster, C.P. 1984. Responses of small mammals to red fox (Vulpes vulpes) odour.J. Zool. London 13:183–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epple, G., Mason, J.R., Nolte, D.L., andCampbell, D.L. 1993. Effects of predator odors on feeding in the mountain beaver (Aplodontia rufa).J. Mammal. 74:715–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagre, D.B., Butler, B.A., Howard, W.E., andTeranashi, R. 1982. Behavioral response of coyotes to selected odors and tastes.Proc. Worldwide Furbearer Conf. 2:966–983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golovnya, R.V., Arsenyev, Y.N., andSvetlova, N.I. 1972. Use of heavy metal salts in the analysis of organic sulfur compounds.J. Chromatogr. 69:79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, M.L. 1984. The responses of prey to stoat (Mustela erminea) scent.J. Zool. London 202:419–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, J.W., Novotny, M., Carmack, M., Copland, G.B., Wilson, S.R. 1978. Chemical scent constituents in the urine of red fox (Vulpes vulpes L.) during the winter season.Science 199:796–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J.R., Epple, G., andNolte, D.L. 1993. Semiochemicals and improvements in rodent control, pp. 327–346,in B.E. Galef, P. Valsecchi, and M. Mainardi (eds.). Ontogeny and Social Transmission of Food Preferences in Mammals: Basic and Applied Research. Horwood Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchiors, M.A., andLeslie, C.A. 1985. Effectiveness of predator fecal odors as black-tailed deer repellents.J. Wildl. Manage. 49:358–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkins, M., Harestad, A.S., andSullivan, T.P. 1991. Cover and efficacy of predator-based repellents for Townsend's vole,Microtus townsendii.J. Chem. Ecol. 17:401–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller-Schwarze, D. 1972. Responses of young black-tailed deer to predator odors.J. Mammal. 53:393–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolte, D.L., Farley, J.P., Campbell, D.L., Epple, G., andMason, J.R. 1993. Potential repellents to prevent mountain beaver damage.Pestic. Sci. 12:624–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymer, J., Wiesler, D., Asa, C., Seal, U.S., andMech, L.D. 1986. Chemical scent constituents in urine of wolf (Canus lupus) and their dependence on reproductive hormones.J. Chem. Ecol. 12:297–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, I. 1990. The effect of mink odour on rabbits and small mammals, pp. 567–572,in D.W. Macdonald, D. Muller-Schwarze, and S.E. Natynczuk, (eds.). Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 5. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T.H., Flath, R.A., Stern, D.J., Mon, T.R., Teranishi, R., Kruse, S.M., Butler, B., andHoward, W.E. 1988. Coyote estrous urine volatiles.J. Chem. Ecol. 14:701–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddart, D.M. 1976. Effect of the odour of weasels (Mustela nivalis L.) on trapped samples of their prey.Oecologia 22:439–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddart, D.M. 1980. Some responses of a free living community of rodents to the odors of predators, pp. 1–10,in D. Muller-Schwarze and R. M. Silverstein (eds). Chemical Signals: Vertebrates and Aquatic Invertebrates. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddart, D.M. 1982. Demonstrations of olfactory discrimination by the short-tailed vole,Microtus agrestis.Anim. Behav. 20:293–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, T.P. 1986. Influence of wolverine (Gulo gulo) odor on feeding behavior of snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus).J. Mammal. 67:385–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, T.P., andCrump, D.R. 1984. Influence of mustelid scent gland compounds on the suppression of feeding by snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus).J. Chem. Ecol. 10:1809–1821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, T.P., andCrump, D.R. 1986a. Feeding responses of snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) to volatile constituents of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) urine.J. Chem. Ecol. 12:229–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, T.P., andCrump, D.R. 1986b. Avoidance response of pocket gophers (Thomomys talpoides) to mustelid and gland compounds, pp. 519–531,in D. Duvall, D. Muller-Schwarze, and R.M. Silverstein (eds.). Chemical signals in Vertebrates 4, Ecology, Evolution and Comparative Biology. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, T.P., Nordstrom, L.O., andSullivan, D.S. 1985a. Use of a predator odors as repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores: Snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus).J. Chem. Ecol. 11:903–909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, T.P., Nordstrom, L.O., andSullivan, D.S. 1985b. Use of a predator odors as repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores: black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus).J. Chem. Ecol. 11:921–935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, T.P., Nordstrom, L.O., andSullivan, D.S. 1988. Use of a predator odors as repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores. III. Montane and meadow voles (Microtus montanus andMicrotus pennsylvanicus).J. Chem. Ecol. 14:363–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, T.P., Crump, D.R., Wieser, H., andDixon, A. 1990. Responses of pocket gophers (Thomomys talpoides) to an operational application of synthetic semiochemicals of stoat (Mustela erminea).J. Chem. Ecol. 16:941–949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swihart, R.K. 1991. Modifying scent marking behavior to reduce woodchuck damage to fruit trees.Ecol. Appl. 1:98–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swihart, R.K., Pignatello, J.J., andMattina, M.J.I. 1991. Aversive responses of white-tailed deer,Odocoileus virginianus, to predator urine.J. Chem. Ecol. 17:767–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Haaften, J.L. 1963. A natural repellent, pp. 389–392,in Transactions of the VI congress of the International Union of Game Biologists. The Nature Conservancy, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernet-Maury, E. 1980. Trimethyl-thiazoline in fox feces: A natural alarming substance for the rat, p. 407,in H. van der Starre (ed.). Olfaction and Taste VII. IRL Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernet-Maury, E., Polak, E.H., andDemael, A. 1984. Structure/activity relationship of stress inducing odorants in the rat.J. Chem. Ecol. 10:1007–1018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, B.G. 1971. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. McGraw-Hill, New York, 907 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nolte, D.L., Mason, J.R., Epple, G. et al. Why are predator urines aversive to prey?. J Chem Ecol 20, 1505–1516 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02059876

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02059876

Key Words

Navigation