Skip to main content
Log in

Safety of first trimester exposure to histamine H2 blockers

A prospective cohort study

  • Esophageal, Gastric, And Duodenal Disorders
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine whether H2 blockers represent a major teratogenic risk. This prospective cohort study was done at the Motherisk Program, a Teratology Information Service, Toronto, Canada. The subjects included 178 women who contacted Motherisk about gestational H2-blocker use, and 178 controls matched for maternal age, smoking, and heavy alcohol consumption. The main outcome measures were primary—major malformations, and secondary—pregnancy outcome, method of delivery, gestational age, prematurity, birthweight, small for gestational age infants, neonatal health problems, and developmental milestones. No increase in major malformations was found following first trimester exposure to H2 blockers [2.1% vs 3.5% (controls), mean difference (95% CI) −1.4% (−5.2, +2.4)]. No other aspects of pregnancy outcome or neonatal health differed between groups. This study suggests that H2-blocker exposure during the first trimester does not represent a major teratogenic risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pope CE: Acid-reflux disorders. N Engl J Med 331(10):656–660, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  2. Advertising supplement. Warner Wellcome Consumer Healthcare, Glaxo, January 1995

  3. Goodman Gilman A, Rall TW, Nies AS, Taylor P (eds): Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 8th ed. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  4. Briggs GG, Freeman RK, Yaffe SJ: Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation, 4th ed. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  5. Colin Jones DG, Langman MJS, Lawson DH, Vessey MP: Post-marketing surveillance of the safety of cimetidine: Twelve-month morbidity report. Q J Med 54(215):253–268, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  6. Knott PD, Thorpe SS, Lamont CAR: Congenital renal dysgenesis possibly due to captopril. Lancet 1:451, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  7. Corazza GR, Gasbarrini G, DiNisio Q, Zulli P: Cimetidine (Tagamet) in peptic ulcer therapy during pregnancy: a report of three cases. Clin Trials J 19(2):91–92, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glade G, Saccar CL, Pereira GR: Cimetidine in pregnancy: Apparent transient liver impairment in the newborn. Am J Dis Child 134:87–88, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  9. Armentano G, Bracco PL, DiSilverio C: Ranitidine in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis in pregnancy. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 16(4):130–133, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cipriani S, Conti R, Vella G: Ranitidina in pregnancy. Three case reports. Clin Eur 22:1, 1983 (in Spanish)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Koren G, Zemlickis DM: Outcome of pregnancy after first trimester exposure to H2 receptor antagonists. Am J Perinatol 8(1):37–38, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maternal-Fetal Toxicology; A Clinician's Guide. New York, Marcel Dekker, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marden PM, Smith DW, McDonald MJ: Congenital anomalies in the newborn infant, including minor variations. J Pediatr 64:357–371, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  14. Usher R, McLean F: Intrauterine growth of live-born caucasian infants at sea level: standards obtained from measurements in 7 dimensions of infants born between 25 and 44 weeks of gestation. J Pediatr 74(6):901–910, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  15. Frankenburg WK: The Denver approach to early case finding.In Early Identification of Children at Risk. WK Frankenburg, RN Emde, JW Sullivan (eds). New York, Plenum Press, 1985, pp 135–158

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fleiss JL: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baron TH, Ramirez B, Richter JE: Gastrointestinal motility disorders during pregnancy. Ann Intern Med 118:366–375, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  18. Castro L de P: Reflux esophagitis as the cause of heartburn in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 98:1–10, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schardein JL: Chemically Induced Birth Defects. New York, Marcel Dekker, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  20. Normal AP (ed): Congenital Abnormalities in Infancy, 2nd ed. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1971

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magee, L.A., Inocencion, G., Kamboj, L. et al. Safety of first trimester exposure to histamine H2 blockers. Digest Dis Sci 41, 1145–1149 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02088230

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02088230

Key words

Navigation