Skip to main content
Log in

Marketing-production decisions under independent and integrated channel structure

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The topic of channel structure has recently attracted much attention among researchers in the marketing and economics area. However, in a majority of the existing literature the cost considerations are extremely simplified with the major focus being pricing policy. What happens when cost incurring decisions are strongly connected with pricing policies? This is the theme we wish to explore in the present paper. The non-trivial costs considered are production, inventory, and retailer effort rate, i.e. we seek to explore the marketing-production channel. We have used the methodology of differential games. The open-loop Stackelberg solution concept has been used to solve the manufacturer and retailer's problem. The Pareto solution concept has been used to solve the problem of the vertically integrated firm. The production, pricing, and effort rate policies thus derived have been compared to obtain insights into the impact of channel structure on these policies. Also, to examine the relation between channel structure and the retailing operation requiring effort, we derive the Stackelberg and Pareto solutions with and without effort rate as a decision variable. We show that once the production rate becomes positive, it does not become zero again. This implies production smoothing. However, none of the gains of production smoothing are passed on to the retailer. The optimal production rate and the inventory policy are a linear combination of the nominal demand rate, the peak demand factor, the salvage value, and the initial inventory. Also, as opposed to some of the existing literature, the optimal policies need not necessarily be concave in nature. In the scenario where the relating operation does not require effort, the pricing policies of the manufacturer and the retailer, and the production policy of the manufacturer have a synergistic effect. However, in the scenario where the retailing operation does benefit from effort, the retailer's pricing policy need not necessarily be synergistic with other policies. With regard to channel structures, it seems that production smoothing will be done more efficiently in the integrated setup. Also, we show that the price paid by the consumer need not necessarily be lower in the integrated setup. But despite higher prices, the channel profits are higher in the integrated setup. This implies a conflict between the interests of the consumers and the firm. Also, this contradicts the results of some of the earlier papers that have used simple static models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Basar, On the uniqueness of the Nash solution in the linear quadratic differential games, Int. J. Game Theory 5(1976)65–90.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Clemhout and H.Y. Wan, Interactive economic dynamics and differential games, J. Optim. Theory Appl 27(1979)7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A.T. Coughlan, Competition and cooperation in marketing channel choice: Theory and application, Marketing Sci. 4(1985) 110–129.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A.T. Coughlan and B. Wernerfelt, On credible delegation by oligopolists: A discussion of distribution channel management, Manag. Sci. 35(1989)226–239.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. Dockner and S. Jorgensen, Cooperative and noncooperative differential game solutions to an investment and pricing problem, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 35(1984)731–739.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Eliashberg and R. Steinberg, Marketing—production decisions in an industrial channel of distribution, Manag. Sci. 33(1987)981–1000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Feichtinger, On the synergistic influence of two control variables on the state of nonlinear optimal control models, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 35(1984)907–914.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Feichtinger and R. Hartl, Optimal pricing and production in an inventory model, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 14(1985)137–155.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C.C. Holt, F. Modigliani, J.F. Muth and H.A. Simon,Planning Production, Inventories and Workforce (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A.P. Jeuland and S.M. Shugan, Managing channel profits, Marketing Sci. 2(1983)239–272.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Jorgensen, Optimal production, purchasing and pricing: A differential game approach, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 23(1986)64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Karp, Optimality and consistency in a differential game with nonrenewable resources, J. Econ. Dynamics Control 8(1984)73–97.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Leitmann and W.E. Schmitendorf, Some sufficiency conditions for Pareto optimal control, ASME J. Dynamic Syst., Measurement Control 95(1973)356–361.

    Google Scholar 

  14. T.W. McGuire and R. Staelin, An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration, Marketing Sci. 2(1983)161–191.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K.S. Moorthy, Strategic decentralization in channels, Marketing Sci. 7(1988)335–355.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Mukundan and W.E. Elsner, Linear feedback strategies in nonzero sum differential games, Int. J. Syst. Sci. 6(1975)513–532.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Parlar, A stochastic production planning model with dynamic chance constraint, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 20(1985)255–260.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Pekelman, Simultaneous price production decisions, Oper. Res. 22(1974)788–794.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Scierstad and K. Sydsaeter,Optimal Control Theory with Economic Applications (North-Holland, New York, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  20. S.P. Sethi and G.L. Thompson,Optimal Control Theory Applications to Management Science (Martinus Nijhoff, Boston, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Simaan and J.B. Cruz, Jr., On the Stackelberg strategy in nonzero sum games, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 11(1973)533–555.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Simaan and J.B. Cruz, Jr., Additional aspects of the Stackelberg strategy in nonzero sum games, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 11(1973)613–626.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Spengler, Vertical integration and antitrust policy, J. Political Econ. 68(1950)347–352.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A.W. Starr and Y.C. Ho, Nonzero sum differential games, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 3(1969)184–206.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A.W. Starr and Y.C. Ho, Further properties of nonzero sum differential games, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 3(1969)207–219.12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Desai, V.S. Marketing-production decisions under independent and integrated channel structure. Ann Oper Res 34, 275–306 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02098183

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02098183

Keywords

Navigation