Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of breast tumours evaluated by ultrasound, mammography, and clinical investigation

  • Published:
Archives of gynecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

One hundred eleven palpable breast tumours were evaluated clinically, by mammography, and by ultrasound; upon histological examination 51 of the tumours turned out to be malignant and 60 benign.

In 44 tumours, which appeared malignant on the ultrasound scan, the axilla was also scanned and the findings were compared with the results of histological examination of excised lymph nodes.

The diagnostic accuracy for malignancy of breast tumours was 86.3% for ultrasound scans, 80.4% for mammography, and 78.4% for clinical evaluation; the respective diagnostic accuracy for benign lesions was 88.3%, 85%, and 91.7%.

Of 36 enlarged reactive or malignant lymph nodes, 32 were detected by ultrasound and only 18 by clinical examination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baum G (1973) Ultrasound mammography. Radiology 122: 199–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderon C, Vilkomerson D, Mezrich R, Etzold KF, Kingsley B, Haskin M (1976) Differences in the attenuation of ultrasound by normal, benign, and malignant breast tissue. J Clin Ultrasound 4: 249–254

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Damascelli B, Musumeci R, Orefice S (1970) Sonar information about breast tumours. Radiology 96: 583–586

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Land FH (1969) A modified technique of ultrasonography for the detection and differential diagnosis for breast lesions. Am J Roentgenol 105: 446–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Howry DH, Stott DA, Bliss WR (1954) Ultrasonic visualization of carcinoma of breast and other soft tissue structures. Cancer 7: 354–358

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jellins J, Kossoff G, Reeve TS, Barraclough BH (1975) Ultrasonic gray scale visualization of breast disease. Ultrasound Med Biol 1: 393–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi, T (1974) Clinical evaluation of ultrasound techniques in breast tumours and malignant abdominal tumours. In: de Vlieger M, White DN, McCready VR (eds) Ultrasonics in medicine. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 191–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi T, Takatani O, Hattori N, Kimura K (1974) Differential diagnosis of breast tumours. The sensitivity graded method of ultrasonotomography and clinical evaluation of its diagnostic accuracy. Cancer 33: 940–951

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lang J, Zana R, Gairard B, Dale G, Gros ChM (1978) Ultrasonic absorption in the breast cyst liquids. Ultrasound Med Biol 4: 125–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pluygers E, Rombaut M, Beauduin M, Hendricks B, Dewergnies F, Pieron A, Tamignaux G (1977) Possibilities, results, and indications of breast echography. Belg Tijdschr Radiologie 60: 181–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixidor MS, Kazam E (1977) Combined mammographic-sonographic evaluation of breast cancer. Am J Roentgenology 128: 409–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagai T, Tsutsumi M, Takeuchi H (1976) Diagnostic ultrasound in breast diseases. In: Donald I, Levi S (eds) Present and future of diagnostic ultrasound. Kooyker, Rotterdam, pp 148–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild JJ, Neal D (1951) The use of high frequency ultrasonic waves for detecting changes in living tissues. Lancet 1: 655–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wild JJ, Reid JM (1952) Further pilot echographic studies on histologic structures of tumours of living intact human breast. Am J Pathol 28: 839–861

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Gezelle, H., Vanpeperstraete, A., Defoort, P. et al. Comparison of breast tumours evaluated by ultrasound, mammography, and clinical investigation. Arch. Gynecol. 230, 219–223 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02111806

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02111806

Key words

Navigation