Abstract
This study examined sex differences in the processes of identity and intimacy development among college youth. Fifty males, and 50 females were given measures of identity status, intimacy status, and self-esteem. Males were found to focus on intrapersonal aspects of identity status, intimacy status, and self-esteem. Males were found to focus on intrapersonal aspects of identity, females on interpersonal aspects. The pursuit of various identity development pathways affected self-esteem differentially for the two sexes. More females than males were found to be intimate and the achievement of intimacy seemed more closely related to identity in males than in females. The findins were interpreted in the context of Eriksonian theory, which seemed more adequate in explaining male than female development.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bem, S. L. (1975). Sex-role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 31: 634–643.
Douvan, E., and Adelson, J. (1966).The Adolescent Experience, Wiley, New York.
Erikson, E. H. (1950).Childhood and Society, Norton, New York.
Erikson, E. H. (1968).Identity: Youth and Crisis, Norton, New York.
Gallatin, J. E. (1975).Adolescence and Individuality, Harper and Row, New York.
Heilbrun, A. B. (1964). Conformity to masculinity-femininity stereotypes and ego identity in adolescents.Psychol. Rep. 14: 351–357.
Josselson, R., Greenberger, E., and McConochie, D. (1977). Phenomenological aspects of psychosocial maturity in adolescence. Part II. Girls.J. Youth Adoles. 6: 145–167.
Kahle, L. R. (1976). Comparison of four methods of measuring self-esteem.Psychol. Rep. 39: 974.
Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 3: 551–558.
Marcia, J. E. (1967). Ego identity status: Relationship to change in self-esteem, “general maladjustment,” and authoritarianism.J. Personal. 35: 113–133.
Marcia, J. E., and Friedman, M. L. (1970). Ego identity status in college women.J. personal. 38: 249–263.
Matteson, D. R. (1975).Adolescence Today, Dorsey Press, Homewood, Ill.
Matteson, D. R. (1977). Exploration and commitment: Sex differences and methodological problems in the use of identity status categories.J. Youth Adoles. 6: 353–374.
Orlofsky, J. L. (1976). Intimacy status: Relationship to interpersonal perception.J. Youth Adoles. 5: 73–88.
Orlofsky, J. L., and Ginsberg, S. D. (in press). Intimacy status: Relationship to affect cognition.Adolescence.
Orlofsky, J. L., Marcia, J. E., and Lesser, I. M. (1973). Ego identity status and the in timacy versus isolation crisis of young adulthood.J. Personal Soc. Psychol. 27: 211–219.
Podd, M. H. (1972). Ego identity status and morality: The relationship between two developmental constructs.Dev. Psychol. 6: 497–507.
Roazen, P. (1976).Erik H. Erikson: The Power and Limits of a Vision, Free Press, New York.
Robinson, J. P., and Shaver, P. R. (1973).Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Rosenkrantz, P., Vogel, S., Bee, H., Broverman, I., and Broverman, D. (1968). Sex-role stereotypes and self-concepts in college students.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 32: 287–295.
Schenkel, S. (1974). Relationship among ego identity status, field-independence, and traditional femininity.J. Youth Adoles. 4: 73–82.
Schenkel, S. and Marcia, J. E. (1972). Attitudes toward premarital intercourse in determining ego identity status in college women.J. Personal. 40: 472–482.
Silber, S., and Tippett, J. S. (1965). Self-esteem: Clinical assessment and measurement validation.Psychol. Rep. 16: 1017–1071.
Toder, N. L., and Marcia, J. E. (1973). Ego identity status and response to conformity pressure in college women.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 26: 287–294.
Waterman, A. S., Geary, P. S., and Waterman, C. K. (1974). Longitudinal study of changes in ego identity status from the freshman to senior year at college.Dev. Psychol. 10: 387–392.
Waterman, A. S., and Goldman, J. A. (1976). A lognitudinal study of ego identity development at a liberal arts college.J. Youth Adoles. 5: 361–369.
Waterman, A. S. and Waterman, C. K. (1971). A longitudinal study of changes in ego identity during the freshman year at college.Dev. Psychol., 5: 167–173.
Waterman, C. K., and Nevid, J. S. (1977). Sex differences in the resolution of the identity crisis.J. Youth Adoles. 6: 337–342.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article is based in part on the doctoral dissertation by James W. Hodgson in partial fulfillment of the Doctor of Philosophy degree, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
Received his Ph. D. in human development and family studies from The Pennsylvania State University. Current research interests include normative and dysfunctional development of late adolescence.
Received her Ph.D. in social personality psychology from the University of Colorado. Current research interests include the developments of friendships and sex roles in adolescence.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hodgson, J.W., Fischer, J.L. Sex differences in identity and intimacy development in college youth. J Youth Adolescence 8, 37–50 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02139138
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02139138