Skip to main content
Log in

Chemical composition and enzymic activity of some worm casts

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

An investigation was carried out to analyze the chemical composition and enzymatic activity of five worm casts obtained from various animal dungs and municipal waste. The E4/E6 values for humic and fulvic acids were higher in all worm casts than in a typical Umbrian soil. Comparisons between worm cast, substrate and soil IR and NMR spectra demonstrated the humifying capacity of worms. Enzyme activity was high in all casts and only dehydrogenase seemed to be affected by lead concentration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bollettino della Società Italiana Scienza del Suolo (SISS) 1976 Ed. G Caponi, Firenze (Italy) 10, 20–55.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bremner J M and Keeney D R 1966 Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 30, 577–582.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Browman M G and Tabatabai M A 1978 Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42, 284–290.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen Y, Senesi N and Schnitzer M 1977 Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41, 352–358.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chendrayan K, Adhya T K and Sethunathan N 1980 Soil Biol. Biochem. 12, 271–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Doelman P and Haanstra L 1979 Soil Biol. Biochem. 11, 271–273.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Edwards C A and Heath G W 1963In Soil Organisms. Eds. J, Doeksen and J. Van Der Drift, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 76–84.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Federici F and D'Elia M 1983 Enzyme Microb. Technol. 5, 225–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hess P R 1971 A Textbook of Soil Chemical Analysis. Ed. J. Murray.

  10. Isaac R A and Kerber J D 1971In Instrumental Methods for Analysis of Soils and Plant Tissue. Eds L M Walsh, Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison W 1.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kononova M M 1966 Soil Organic Matter. Pergamon Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roberge M R 1978In Soil Enzymes. Ed. R G Burns., Academic Press, London, pp 341–369.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ruggiero P, Interesse F S, Cassidei L and Sciacovelli O 1980 Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 44, 603–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schnitzer M and Gupta U C 1965 Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 29, 274–277.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schnitzer M and Khan S U 1972 Humic Substances in the Environment. Ed. Dekker M, New York, pp 57–60.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tabatabai M A and Bremner J M 1969 Soil Biol. Biochem. 1, 301–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tabatabai M A and Bremner J M 1970 Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 34, 225–229.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Research work supported by CNR, Italy. Special grant I.P.R.A.-Sub-project 1. Paper N. 94.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Businelli, M., Perucci, P., Patumi, M. et al. Chemical composition and enzymic activity of some worm casts. Plant Soil 80, 417–422 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02140048

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02140048

Key words

Navigation