Abstract
This study investigates on-line and off-line resolution of a Japanese reflexive,jibun, for logophoric sentences, i.e., complex sentences involving a matrix verb that reflects one's point of view feelings, or state of consciousness, and for nonlogophoric sentences, i.e., complex sentences involving a subordinate adverbial clause. According to Kuroda's (1973) thesis and Chomsky's (1981) binding principle (for nonlogophoric sentences only), the reflexive in the logophoric sentences can be associated with the subject of both a matrix sentence and a subordinate sentence whereas that in the nonlogophoric sentences can only be associated with the subject of the subordinate sentence. In Experiment 1, 42 students were administered a probe-recognition task in which a probe was given for the subject either of the matrix sentence or of the subordinate sentence immediately after the end of the subordinate clause or at the end of a sentence following the matrix verb. Recognition times were faster for a matrix-subject probe than for a subordinatesubject probe regardless of the sentence type and probe position. In Experiment 2, 40 students were administered an on-line antecedent identification task in which they were required to quickly and accurately identify, when given a probe, the antecedent of the reflexive, with the probe given after the reflexive or at the end of a sentence. Regardless of the sentence type, matrix-subject was judged to be the antecedent of the reflexive more often than subordinate-subject, with the effect of probe position being negligible. An offline study required 136 students to indicate the antecedent(s) for the two types of sentence given in their entirety. No effect of sentence type was found. Findings indicate that neither Kuroda's thesis nor Chomsky's binding principle is applied when Japanese speakers parse logophoric and nonlogophoric sentences.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.),Cognition and the development of language (pp. 279–362). New York: Wiley.
Birdsong, D. (1989).Metalinguistic performance and interlinguistic competence. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Chang, F. (1980). Active memory processes in visual sentence processing: Clause effects and pronominal reference.Memory and Cognition, 8, 58–64.
Chomsky, N. (1981).Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris.
Chomsky, N. (1986).Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.
Chomsky, N. (1988).Language and problems of knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clements, G. N. (1975). The logophoric pronoun in Ewe: Its role in discourse.Journal of West African Languages, 2, 141–177.
Cloitre, M., & Bever, T. G. (1988). Linguistic anaphors, levels of representation, and discourse.Language and Cognitive Processes.3, 293–322.
Cook, V. J. (1988).Chomsky's universal grammar: introduction. Oxford. England: Basil Blackwell.
Dell, G. S., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1983). The activation of antecedent information during the processing of anaphoric reference in reading.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior.22, 121–132.
Duffy, S., & Rayner, K. (1990). Eye movements and anaphor resolution: Effects of antecedent typicality and distance.Language and Speech, 33, 103–119.
Ehrlich, K., & Rayner, K. (1990). Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: Eye movements and immediacy of processing.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal behavior, 22, 75–87.
Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1990). Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: Evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, and Cognition, 16, 555–568.
Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. (1985). On-line resolution of anaphoric pronouns: Effects of inference making and verb semantics.British Journal of Psychology, 76, 385–393.
Giorgi, A. (1983/1984). Toward a theory of long distance anaphors: A GB approach.Linguistic Review, 3, 307–361.
Greene, S. B., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Pronoun resolution and discourse models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, and Cognition, 18, 266–283.
Hickok, G., Canseco-Gonzalez, E., Zurif, E., & Grimshaw, J. (1992). Modularity in locating Wh-gaps.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, 545–561.
Inoue, K. (1976).Henkeibunpo to nihongo: Ge [Transformational grammar and Japanese: Vol. 2]. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.
Kameyama, M. (1984). Subjective/logophoric bound anaphorZibun.Papers from regional meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 20, 228–238.
Kess, J. F. & Hoppe, R. A. (1983). Individual differences and metalinguistic abilities.Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 28, 47–53.
Kess, J. F., & Hoppe, R. A. (1985). Bias, individual differences, and “shared knowledge” in ambiguity.Journal of Pragmatics, 9, 21–39.
Kuno, S. (1973).Nihon bunpo kenkyu [The structure of the Japanese language]. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.
Kuno, S. (1978).Danwa no bunpo [Grammar of discourse]. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.
Kuroda, S.-Y. (1973). Where epistemology, style, and grammar meet: A case study from Japanese. In S. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (Eds.),Festschrift for Morris Halle (pp. 377–391). New York: Holt.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1974).Formal grammars in linguistics and psycholinguistics. Volume III.: Psychological applications. The Hague: Mouton.
Magliano, J. P., Graesser, A. C., Eymard, L. A., Haberlandt, K., & Gholson, B. (1993). Locus of interpretive and inference processes during text comprehension: A comparison of gaze durations and word reading times.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, and Cognition, 19, 704–709.
Mailing, J. (1984). Non-clause-bounded reflexives in modern leelandic.Linguistics and Philosophy.7, 211–241.
McCawley, N. A. (1976). Reflexivization: A transformational approach. In M. Shibatani (Ed.),Syntax and semantics: Japanese generative grammar (pp. 51–116). San Diego: Academic Press.
McElree, B., & Bever, T. G. (1989). The psychological reality of linguistically defined gaps.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 18, 21–35.
McKoon, G., & Rateliff, R. (1980). The comprehension processes and memory structures involved in anaphoric reference.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 19, 668–682.
Mitchell, D. C. (1989). Verb guidance and other lexical effects in parsing.Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 123–154.
Nagata, H. (1988). The relativity of linguistic intuition: The effect of repetition on grammaticality judgments.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 1–17.
Nagata, H. (1989a). Effect of repetition on grammaticality judgments under objective and subjective self-awareness conditions.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 255–269.
Nagata, H. (1989b). Judgments of sentence grammaticality with differentiation and enrichment strategies.Perceptual and Motor Skills 68, 463–469.
Nagata, H. (1989c). Judgments of sentence grammaticality and field-dependence of subjects.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 739–747.
Nagata, H. (1991). Temporal course of activation of the antecedent by the reflexive in syntactically ambiguous sentences in Japanese.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 501–520.
Nagata, H. (1992). Activation of the antecedent by the reflexive in Japanese: A supplementary control experiment.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 99–106.
Nagata, H. (1993a). Unimmediate construction of syntactic structure for garden path sentences in Japanese.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 365–381.
Nagata, H. (1993b). Verb-control information in parsing Japanese reflexive sentences.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 207–215.
Nicol, J., & Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 5–19.
O'Brien, E. J., Duffy, S. A., & Myers, J. L. (1986). Anaphoric inference during reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 346–352.
Rateliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming in memory.Psychological Review, 95, 385–408.
Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., Morris, R. K., Schmauder, A. R., & Clifton, C. Jr. (1989). Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes.Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, SI 21–49.
Shillcock, R. (1982). The on-line resolution of pronominal anaphora.Language and Speech, 25, 385–401.
Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645–660.
Swinney, D. A. (1991). The resolution of indeterminacy during language comprehension: Perspectives on modularity in lexical, structural and pragmatic process. In G. B. Simpson (Ed.),Understanding word and sentence (pp. 367–385). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Part of this study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, No. 05610067. Deep gratitude is due to Professor D. D. Steinberg for reading an earlier version of this paper. Thanks are also due to Ms. S. Ogawa for her help in collecting part of the off-line data.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nagata, H. On-line and off-line reflexive resolution in Japanese logophoric sentences. J Psycholinguist Res 24, 205–229 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02145356
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02145356