Skip to main content
Log in

Legitimizing local knowledge: From displacement to empowerment for third world people

  • Articles
  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing attention has been given to “indigenous” knowledge in Third World rural societies as a potential basis for sustainable agricultural development. It has been found that many people have functional knowledge systems pertaining to their resources and environment, which are based on experience and experimentation, and which are sometimes based on unique epistemologies. Efforts have been made to include such knowledge in participatory research and projects. This paper discusses socio-political, institutional, and ethical issues that need to be considered in order to understand the actual limitations and contributions of such knowledge systems. It reviews the nature of local knowledge and suggests the need to recognize its unique values yet avoid romanticized views of its potential. Local knowledge and alternative bottom-up projects continue to be marginalized because of the dominance of conventional top-down R&approaches, pressures of agrochemical firms, scientific professionalism, and for other political-economic reasons. It is argued that the exploitation of local knowledge by formal institutions should be avoided; instead, people need to establish legitimacy of their knowledge for themselves, as a form of empowerment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altieri, M., 1983a.Agroecology: The Scientific Basis of Alternative Agriculture. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M., 1983b. “The question of small farm development: Who teaches whom?” inAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 9, pp. 401–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M., 1988. “Why Study Traditional Agriculture,” in C.R. Carrollet al. (eds),The Ecology of Agricultural Systems. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. and M. Anderson, 1986. “An ecological basis for the development of alternative agricultural systems for small farmers in the Third World,”American Journal of Alternative Agriculture. 1: 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R., 1984. “Protecting the Environment Against the Poor”,The Ecologist. 11(2) pp. 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, B., D. Breedlove, and P. Raven, 1973. “General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology,”American Anthropologist. 75: 214–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, S. D., 1980a. “Informal Research and Development,”Ceres. July/Aug, 23–25.

  • Biggs, S. D., 1980b. “Sources of Innovation in Agricultural Technology,” Paper for the Development Studies Association Workshop on Science and Technology, Queen Elizabeth House, Oxford, 24–26 March, 1980.

  • Biggs, S. D., 1985. “A farming systems approach: Some unanswered questions,”Agricultural Administration. Vol 18: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brokensha, D., D. Warren, and O. Werner, 1980.Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Development. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlier, H., 1987.Understanding Traditional Agriculture. Leusden, The Netherlands: Information Centre for Low External Input Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., 1980. “The small farmer is a professional,”Ceres. 13(2), July/August.

  • Chambers, R., 1983.Rural Development: Putting the Last First. Harlow, United Kingdom: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. and J. Jiggins, 1986.Agricultural Research for Resource-Poor Farmers: A Parsimonious Paradigm. IDS, Univ. of Sussex, Discussion Paper 220.

  • Chambers, R. and B. P. Ghildyal, 1985. “Agricultural research for resource-poor farmers: a parsimonious paradigm,”Agricultural Administration. 20, pp. 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., A. Pacey, and L. A. Thrupp, 1989.,Farmer First: Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. and M. Uphoff, 1980. “Participation's Place in Rural Development: Seeking Clarity through Specificity,”World Development. 8: 213–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, H. C., 1957.Hanunoo Agriculture in the Philippines. FAO Forestry Development Paper, no. 12, Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, G., 1985. “Agroecosystem analysis,”Agricultural Administration. 20: 31–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G., and M. Atkins, 1979.Agricultural Ecology. San Francisco, California: WH Freeman and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culbert, T. P., 1974.The Lost Civilization: The Story of the Classic Maya. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckholm, E., 1976.Losing Ground: Environmental Stress and World Food Prospects. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, J. and A. Martin, 1987.Farmer Participatory Research: A Review of Concepts and Practices. ODI Agricultural Administration Network, Discussion Paper No. 19, Overseas Development Institute, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliessman, S., R. Garcia, and M. Amador, 1981. “The ecological basis for the application of traditional agricultural technology in the management of tropical agroecosystems.”Agroecosystems. 7: 173–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gossett, T. E., 1965.Race: The History of an Idea in America, Shoken, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howes, M., 1979. “Indigenous technical knowledge, analysis, implications, and issues,”IDS Bulletin. 10(2): 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howes, M. and R. Chambers, 1979. Workshop on Indigenous Technical Knowledge. Institute of Development Studies, Univ. of Sussex, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiggins, J., 1989. “An examination of the impact of colonialism in establishing negative values and attitudes towards indigenous agricultural knowledge,” in D. M. Warrenet al. (eds),Indigenous Knowledge Systems: Implications for Agriculture and International Development. Iowa State University, Studies in Technology and Social Change, No. 11, Ames, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juma, C., 1989.The Gene Hunters. London: Zed Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klee, G., 1980.World Systems of Traditional Resource Management, New York: J. Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koliske, L., 1936.The Moon and Growth of Plants, Anthroposophical Foundations.

  • Leonard, J., 1985.Divesting Nature's Capital: The Political Economy of Environmental Abuse in Developing Countries. New York: Holmes and Meier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, A., 1980.El Influjo de la luna, EDAF. S. A. Espana.

  • Marten, G. G., 1986.Traditional Agriculture in Southeast Asia: A Human Ecology Perspective, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, J. and D. Pitt (eds), 1985.Culture and Conservation: The Human Dimension in Environmental Planning. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard, R., 1984. “Traditional Agricultural Knowledge: Past performance, future prospects, and institutional implications,”American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 66: 874–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard, R., 1987. “The epistemological basis of agroecology,” in M. Altieri (ed),Agroecology: The Scientific Basis of Alternative Agriculture. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posey, D. A., 1983. “Indigenous knowledge and Development: An ideological bridge to the future.”Ciencia e cultura, 35 (7) pp. 877–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R., 1968.Pigs for the Ancestors: Ritual in the Ecology of a New Guinea People. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, R. E., 1984.Breaking New Ground: Agricultural Anthropology. Lima, Peru: International Potato Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P., 1979. “Community Environment knowledge in African rural development,”IDS Bulletin, Vol 10(2), 1979: 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P., 1985.Indigenous Agricultural Revolution. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P., 1986.Coping With Hunger: Hazard and Experiment in An African Rice Farming System. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocheleau, D., 1987. “Women, Trees and Tenure: Implications for Agroforestry Research” in J. B. Raintree, ed.,Trees and Tenure. Proceedings of an International Workshop on Tenure Issues in Agroforestry. Nairobi: ICRAF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slikkerveer, L. J., 1989. “Changing values and attitudes of social and natural scientists towards indigenous peoples and their knowledge systems, in D. M. Warrenet al (eds),Indigenous Knowledge Systems: Implications for Agriculture and International Development. Studies in Technology and Social Change, No. 11, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumberg, J. and C. Okali, 1988. “Farmers, on-farm research and the development of technology,”Experimental Agriculture. Vol 24, part 3, pp. 333–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, J., 1979. “Notes on traditional knowledge, modern knowledge, and rural development,”IDS Bulletin. 10(2), 1979: 41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrupp, L. A., 1980.Deforestation, Agricultural Development, and Cattle-Expansion in Costa Rica: An Integrated Approach to Land-Use Transformation. Stanford University, Honors Thesis, Human Biology, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrupp, L. A., 1981. “The peasant view of conservation,”Ceres. 14(4) July/August

  • Thrupp, L. A., 1984. “Women, Wood, and Work, In Kenya and Beyond,”Unasylva. (FAO Journal of Forestry — Special Issue). December.

  • Thrupp, L. A., 1985. “Farmers decision making concerning pest control and pesticide use,” inProceedings of Course on Agroecology in Costa Rica, Organization of Tropical Studies, University of Costa Rica, San Jose.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrupp, L. A., 1988.The Political Ecology of Pesticide Use in Developing Countries: Dilemmas in the Banana Sector of Costa Rica. Phd Dissertation, IDS, University of Sussex.

  • Toledo, V., M. Carabias, C. Mapes, and C. Toledo, 1985.Ecología y Autosuficiencia Alimentaria. Siglo Veintiuno: Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, R., 1988.Farmer Participation in Agricultural Research: New Directions of Old Problems. Draft Discussion Paper, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. L. and S. B. Brush (eds), 1987.Comparative Farming Systems. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D. M., 1989. “The impact of nineteenth century social science in establishing negative values and attitudes toward indigenous knowledge systems,” in D. M. Warrenet al. (eds),Indigenous Knowledge Systems: Implications for Agriculture and International Development. Studies in Technology and Social Change, No. 11, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D. M., L. J. Slikkerveer, and S. O. Titilola (eds), 1989.Indigenous Knowledge Systems: Implications for Agriculture and International Development, Studies in Technology and Social Change, No. 11, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilken, G. C., 1977. “Intergrating forest and small scale farm systems in Middle America,”Forest, Ecology and Management. Vol 1, 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • For further references: Refer to the bibliography and chapters within Chambers, R. A. Pacey, and L. A. Thrupp (eds). 1989.Farmer First. London and New York: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Lori Ann Thrupp is presently a postdoctoral research fellow at the University of California Berkeley (in the Energy and Resources Program), pursuing work on sustainable agricultural development strategies. She received her doctoral and masters degree in Development Studies from the University of Sussex (U.K.), and her bachelors from Stanford University in Human Biology and Latin American Studies. Her interests are natural resource management, sustainable development, political ecology, agricultural technology transfer, indigenous knowledge, and environmental policy issues in developing countries. Her doctoral dissertation research was on “The Political Ecology of Pesticide Use in Costa Rica,” supported by a Fulbright Scholarship. She has also received grants from the National Wildlife Federation, Marshall Foundation, and Dudley Seers Fund. Her professional experiences include consulting, teaching, and research on natural resource issues and agroecology for organizations such as CATIE (a Tropical Agriculture Institute) in Costa Rica, the Pragma Corporation, USAID, the Organization of Tropical Studies, the International Institute for Environmental and Development (on a fuelwood energy project in Kenya), the Intermediate Technology Development Group, the Worldwatch Institute, Resources for the Future. She has published in both Spanish and English (including co-authorship of a book on “EI Uso de los plaguicidas en Costa Rica”, and co-editing a book with Robert Chambers and Arnold Pacey on “Farmer First: Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thrupp, L.A. Legitimizing local knowledge: From displacement to empowerment for third world people. Agric Hum Values 6, 13–24 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217665

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217665

Keywords

Navigation