Skip to main content
Log in

Psychometric limitations of the Personality Assessment Inventory: A reply to Morey's (1995) rejoinder

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some psychometric problems with the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) were observed by Boyle and Lennon (1994). However, Morey (1995) asserted there were “several methodological and conceptual limits” and alternative explanations of the Boyle and Lennon data. Although Morey asserted that age and clinical status were confounded, Boyle and Lennon statistically partialled out variance due to age, using ANCOVA procedures. Morey's description of Boyle and Lennon's sample as “unusual” was strange—schizophrenic and alcoholic patients in a psychiatric hospital comprised the clinical groups—the PAI was designed specifically to assess psychopathology in such patients. Although Morey claimed that alpha coefficients were misinterpreted, Boyle and Lennon based their conclusions solely on the obtained coefficients. Morey's attempt to downplay the finding of suboptimal stability for several PAI scales also runs counter to the empirical results actually observed. Finally, Morey attempted to minimize the role of factor analysis in investigating construct validity, apparently to deflect attention from deficiencies in the factor analysis of a clinical sample reported in the PAI manual.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description.Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187–215.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, G. J. (1979). Delimitation of state-trait curiosity in relation to state anxiety and learning task performance.Australian Journal of Education, 23, 70–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, G. J. (1983). Effects on academic learning of manipulating emotional states and motivational dynamics.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 347–357.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, G. J. (1985). Self-report measures of depression: Some psychometric consideration.British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24, 45–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, G. J. (1988). Exploratory factor analytic principles in motivation research. In J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.),Handbook of Multivariate experimental Psychology (pp. 742–745). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, G. J. (1991). Does item homogeneity indicate internal consistency or item redundancy in psychometric scales?Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 291–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, G. J. (1993). Special review: Evaluation of the exploratory factor analysis programs provided in SPSSX and SPSS/PC+.Multivariate Experimental Clinical Research, 10, 129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, G. J. (1994). Self-Description Questionnaire II. In D. J. Keyser & R. C. Sweetland (Eds.),Test critiques (Vol. 10, pp. 632–643). Kansas City, MO: Test Corporation of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, G. J. (1995a). Measurement of intelligence and personality within the Cattellian psychometric model.Multivariate Experimental Clinical Research, 11, 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, G. J. (1995b). Review of the Personality Assessment Inventory. In J. C. Conoley & J. Impara (Eds.),Twelfth mental measurements yearbook, Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, G. J., & Cattell, R. B. (1984). Proof of situational sensitivity of mood states and dynamic traits—ergs and sentiments—to disturbing stimuli.Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 541–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, G. J., & Lennon, T. J. (1994). Examination of the reliability and validity of the Personality Assessment Inventory.Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 16, 173–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, G. J., & Stanley, G. V. (1986). Application of factor analysis in psychological research: Improvement of simple structure by computer-assisted graphic oblique transformation: A brief note.Multivariate Experimental Clinical Research, 8, 175–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, G. J., Ward, J., & Lennon, T. J. (1994). Personality assessment inventory: A confirmatory factor analysis.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 1441–1442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, G. J., Stankov, L., & Cattell, R. B. (1995). Measurement and statistical models in the study of personality and intelligence. In D. H. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.),International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1973).Personality and mood by questionnaire. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1978).The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1987).Intelligence: Its structure, growth and action. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1992). Human motivation objectively, experimentally analyzed.British Journal of Medical Psychology, 65, 237–243.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B., & Child, D. (1975).Motivation and dynamic structure. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B., & Kline, P. (1977).The scientific analysis of personality and motivation. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyle, G.J. Psychometric limitations of the Personality Assessment Inventory: A reply to Morey's (1995) rejoinder. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 18, 197–203 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229118

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229118

Key words

Navigation