Skip to main content
Log in

Examination of the reliability and validity of the personality assessment inventory

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The reliability, discriminant validity, and construct validity of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) — a multidimensional self-report measure of abnormal personality traits — were examined within the Australian context. Subjects included 151 normals, 30 alcoholics, and 30 schizophrenic patients. A subsample of 70 nonpsychiatric adults responded to the PAI items twice over a test-retest interval of 28 days. The resulting median retest coefficient was 0.7, indicating less than optimal stability. The median alpha (KR21) coefficient was 0.8, suggesting somewhat narrow measurement scales. A significant multivariate main effect was obtained across groups after the effects of age and gender were removed. Multiple comparisons for each of the PAI scales revealed significant differences between the respective groups, as discussed. A higher-order scale factoring did not strongly support the purported PAI structure. In reanalyses of the correlation matrices included in the Professional Manual, the purported PAI factor structure was unable to be replicated for the standardization clinical sample (N=1246), and a confirmatory factor analysis using the normative (validation) correlational data (N=1000) revealed poor fit indices, raising further concerns about construct validity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. M. (1989). Psychometric stability of rewritten MMPI items.Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, 645–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, G. J. (1985). Self-report measures of depression: Some psychometric considerations.British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24, 45–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, G. J. (1987). Psychopathological depression superfactors in the Clinical Analysis Questionnaire.Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 609–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, G. J. (1991). Does item homogeneity indicate internal consistency or item redundancy in psychometric scales?Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 291–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, G. J. (1994). Review of the Personality Assessment Inventory. In J. C. Conoley & J. Impara (Eds.),Twelfth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989).Manual for the restandardized Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: MMPI-2. An interpretative and administrative guide. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, A. (1991). Commentary on The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: A review.Journal of Counselling and Development, 69, 568–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1978).The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbisiero, J. R., & Reznikoff, M. (1991). The relationship between personality type and problem drinking.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47, 291–298.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1989).The Neo-PI/Neo-FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. J., Offord, K. P., Colligan, R. L., & Morse, R. M. (1991). The CAL: An MMPI Alcoholism scale for General Medical Patients.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47, 632–646.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Community Services and Health Statistical Services Section (1988).Alcohol in Australia: A summary of related statistics. Canberra: Commonwealth Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, J. C. (1991). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: A review.Journal of Counselling and Development, 69, 564–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Dimensions of personality: 16, 5, 3?Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 773–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, E. (1990). Artifact in pain ratings, its implications for test-retest reliability, and correction by a new scaling procedure.Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 12, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, E., Nygren, T. E., & Thorn, B. E. (1991). An “open transformed scale” for correcting ceiling effects and enhancing retest reliability: The example of pain.Perception and Psychophysics, 49, 572–578.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1983).Factor analysis (rev 2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottesman, I. I., & Prescott, G. A. (1989). Abuses of the MacAndrew MMPI Alcoholism Scale: A critical review.Clinical Psychology Review, 9, 223–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmes, E., & Reddon, J. R. (1993). A perspective on developments in assessing psychopathology: A critical review of the MMPI and MMPI-2.Psychological Bulletin, 113, 453–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989).LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications (2nd ed.), Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keppel, G. (1991).Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (rev. 3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P. (1985).Factor analysis and related methods. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, L. C. (1985). A psychometric analysis of five DSM-III categories.Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 323–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morey, L. C. (1991).The Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Personality Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R., Ornduff, S. R., & Sewell, K. W. (1993). Feigning specific disorders: A study of the Personality Assessment Inventory.Journal of Personality Assessment, 60, 554–560.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen, A., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1992). The new uniformT scores for the MMPI-2: Rationale, derivation and appraisal.Psychological Assessment, 4, 145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, L. C., & Rothaus, P. (1991). The Measurement of Denial and Rationalization in male alcoholics.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47, 465–468.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, C. G. (1985). More reasons for moratorium: A reply to Maisto & O'Farrell.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 46, 450–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. (1993).The Personality Assessment Inventory in a forensic setting. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyle, G.J., Lennon, T.J. Examination of the reliability and validity of the personality assessment inventory. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 16, 173–187 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229206

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229206

Key words

Navigation