Abstract
The reliability, discriminant validity, and construct validity of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) — a multidimensional self-report measure of abnormal personality traits — were examined within the Australian context. Subjects included 151 normals, 30 alcoholics, and 30 schizophrenic patients. A subsample of 70 nonpsychiatric adults responded to the PAI items twice over a test-retest interval of 28 days. The resulting median retest coefficient was 0.7, indicating less than optimal stability. The median alpha (KR21) coefficient was 0.8, suggesting somewhat narrow measurement scales. A significant multivariate main effect was obtained across groups after the effects of age and gender were removed. Multiple comparisons for each of the PAI scales revealed significant differences between the respective groups, as discussed. A higher-order scale factoring did not strongly support the purported PAI structure. In reanalyses of the correlation matrices included in the Professional Manual, the purported PAI factor structure was unable to be replicated for the standardization clinical sample (N=1246), and a confirmatory factor analysis using the normative (validation) correlational data (N=1000) revealed poor fit indices, raising further concerns about construct validity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. M. (1989). Psychometric stability of rewritten MMPI items.Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, 645–653.
Boyle, G. J. (1985). Self-report measures of depression: Some psychometric considerations.British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24, 45–59.
Boyle, G. J. (1987). Psychopathological depression superfactors in the Clinical Analysis Questionnaire.Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 609–614.
Boyle, G. J. (1991). Does item homogeneity indicate internal consistency or item redundancy in psychometric scales?Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 291–294.
Boyle, G. J. (1994). Review of the Personality Assessment Inventory. In J. C. Conoley & J. Impara (Eds.),Twelfth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989).Manual for the restandardized Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: MMPI-2. An interpretative and administrative guide. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Caldwell, A. (1991). Commentary on The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: A review.Journal of Counselling and Development, 69, 568–569.
Cattell, R. B. (1978).The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York: Plenum.
Corbisiero, J. R., & Reznikoff, M. (1991). The relationship between personality type and problem drinking.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47, 291–298.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1989).The Neo-PI/Neo-FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Davis, L. J., Offord, K. P., Colligan, R. L., & Morse, R. M. (1991). The CAL: An MMPI Alcoholism scale for General Medical Patients.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47, 632–646.
Department of Community Services and Health Statistical Services Section (1988).Alcohol in Australia: A summary of related statistics. Canberra: Commonwealth Government.
Duckworth, J. C. (1991). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: A review.Journal of Counselling and Development, 69, 564–567.
Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Dimensions of personality: 16, 5, 3?Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 773–790.
Fernandez, E. (1990). Artifact in pain ratings, its implications for test-retest reliability, and correction by a new scaling procedure.Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 12, 1–15.
Fernandez, E., Nygren, T. E., & Thorn, B. E. (1991). An “open transformed scale” for correcting ceiling effects and enhancing retest reliability: The example of pain.Perception and Psychophysics, 49, 572–578.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983).Factor analysis (rev 2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gottesman, I. I., & Prescott, G. A. (1989). Abuses of the MacAndrew MMPI Alcoholism Scale: A critical review.Clinical Psychology Review, 9, 223–242.
Helmes, E., & Reddon, J. R. (1993). A perspective on developments in assessing psychopathology: A critical review of the MMPI and MMPI-2.Psychological Bulletin, 113, 453–471.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989).LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications (2nd ed.), Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
Keppel, G. (1991).Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (rev. 3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
McDonald, R. P. (1985).Factor analysis and related methods. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Morey, L. C. (1985). A psychometric analysis of five DSM-III categories.Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 323–329.
Morey, L. C. (1991).The Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Personality Assessment Resources.
Rogers, R., Ornduff, S. R., & Sewell, K. W. (1993). Feigning specific disorders: A study of the Personality Assessment Inventory.Journal of Personality Assessment, 60, 554–560.
Tellegen, A., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1992). The new uniformT scores for the MMPI-2: Rationale, derivation and appraisal.Psychological Assessment, 4, 145–155.
Ward, L. C., & Rothaus, P. (1991). The Measurement of Denial and Rationalization in male alcoholics.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47, 465–468.
Watson, C. G. (1985). More reasons for moratorium: A reply to Maisto & O'Farrell.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 46, 450–453.
White, J. (1993).The Personality Assessment Inventory in a forensic setting. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boyle, G.J., Lennon, T.J. Examination of the reliability and validity of the personality assessment inventory. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 16, 173–187 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229206
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229206