Skip to main content
Log in

The introduction of the alien amphipodGammarus tigrinus Sexton, 1939 (Crustacea, Amphipoda) in The Netherlands and its competition with indigenous species

  • Published:
Hydrobiological Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

In oligohaline watersGammarus tigrinus has a much greater reproductive capacity than any of the three indigenous (sub)speciesG. d. duebeni, G. zaddachi orG. p. pulex. The most important factors that enable this recently introduced species to compete the local species are: (a) its favourable reproductive period during the warm summer months, (b) its very short egg-incubation period, and (c) its very short time needed to reach sexual maturity.

So if (1)G. tigrinus tends to occupy the same habitats as the originalGammarus species and (2) it is subjected to the same density controlling factors then its greater reproductive capacity will enable this species to outnumber and gradually replace the three indigenous species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • CHAMBERS, M.R., 1971. Studies on the littoral fauna of Tjeukemeer. Ph. D. thesis Univ. of Liverpool: 1–281.

  • DENNERT, H.G., A.L. DENNERT, P. KANT, S. PINKSTER and J.H. STOCK, 1969. Upstream and downstream migrations in relation to the reproductive cycle and to environmental factors of the amphipodGammarus zaddachi. Bijdr. Dierk., 39(1): 11–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • DENNERT, H.G. and M.J. VAN MAREN, 1974. Further observations on the migration ofGammarus zaddachi Sexton (Crustacea, Amphipoda) in a french stream. Bull. zool. Mus. Univ. Amsterdam, 3 (20): 157–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • DORGELO, J., 1974. Comparative ecophysiology of gammarids (Crustacea: Amphipoda) from marine, brackish and fresh-water habitats, exposed to the influence of salinity-temperature combinations. I. Effect on survival. Hydrobiol. Bull., 8 (1–2): 90–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • DORGELO, J., 1976. Comparative ecophysiology of gammarids (Crustacea: Amphipoda) from marine, brackish and fresh-water habitats, exposed to the influence of salinity-temperature combinations. II. Preference experiments. Verh. int. Verein. theor. angew. Limnol., 19 (in press).

  • HARTOG, C. DEN and A.S. TULP, 1960. Hydrobiologische waarnemingen in Friesland (slot). Levende Natuur, 63 (6): 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • HARTOG, C. DEN 1964. The amphipods of the Deltaic region of the rivers Rhine, Meuse and Scheldt in relation to the hydrography of the area. Part III Gammaridae. Neth. J. Sea Res., 2 (3): 407–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEINZE, K., 1932. Fortpflanzung und Brutpflege beiGammarus pulex L. undCarinogammarus roeselii Gerv. Inaugural-Dissertation, Berlin: 398–440.

  • HYNES, H.B.N., 1954. The ecology ofGammarus duebeni Lilljeborg and its occurrence in fresh water in western Britain. J. anim. Ecol., 23: 38–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • HYNES, H.B.N., 1955. The reproductive cycle of some British fresh-water gammaridae. J. anim. Ecol., 24: 352–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • KINNE, O., 1953. Zur Biologie und Physiologie vonGammarus duebeni Lillj., 1. Zeitschr. wiss. Zool., 157: 427–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • KINNE, O., 1959. Ecological data on the AmphipodGammarus duebeni, a monograph. Veröff. Inst. Meeresforsch. Bremerhaven, 6: 177–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • KINNE, O., 1961. Growth, molting frequency, heart beat, number of eggs, and incubation time inGammarus zaddachi exposed to different environments. Crustaceana, 2 (1): 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • NIJSSEN, H. and J.H. STOCK, 1966. The amphipodGammarus tigrinus Sexton, 1939, introduced in the Netherlands (Crustacea). Beaufortia, 13 (60): 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROUX, A.L., 1970. Le cycle de reproduction de deux espèces étroitement parentes de Crustacés Amphipodes:Gammarux pulex etG. fossarum. Ann. Limnol., 6 (1): 27–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • RUOFF, K., 1968. Experimentelle Untersuchungen über den in die Weser eingebürgerten amerikanischen BachflohkrebseGammarus tigrinus Sexton. Arch. Fischwiss., 19 (2–3): 134–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • SMIT, H., 1974. Extension de l'aire de répartition deGammarus tigrinus Sexton en 1973 aux Pays Bas, et quelques remarques sur la concurrence avec les gammares indigènes (Crustacea, Amphipoda) Bull. zool. Mus. Univ. Amsterdam, 4 (5): 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • VOS, A.P.C. DE, 1941. Zoologische resultaten van een tocht rond het IJsselmeer van 5–8 juli 1937. Meded. Zuiderzee-Comm. ned. dierk. Vereen., 5: 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • VOS, A.P.C. DE, 1954-a. De littorale fauna van het IJsselmeer. Flora Fauna Zuiderzee, 3: 268–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • VOS, A.P.C. DE, 1954-b. Over de oever- en bodemfauna der binnendijkse kolken langs het IJsselmeer. Flora Fauna IJsselmeer, 3: 277–282.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pinkster, S. The introduction of the alien amphipodGammarus tigrinus Sexton, 1939 (Crustacea, Amphipoda) in The Netherlands and its competition with indigenous species. Hydrobiological Bulletin 9, 131–138 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02263332

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02263332

Keywords

Navigation