Skip to main content
Log in

Autonomic involvement in multiple sclerosis: a pupillometric study

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Autonomic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To study pupillary autonomic function in multiple sclerosis (MS), we examined 36 subjects with low disability, preserved visual acuity and no recent history (2 years) of optic neuritis or actual visual complaints. Compared to controls, MS patients showed a greater dilatator reaction with darkness and, for the light reflex, a lower amplitude and contraction rate and a greater recovery of pupillary diameter 5 s after the stimulus. Within the MS group, no difference was found comparing patients with or without the following characteristics: nuclear magnetic resonance imaging evidence of midbrain lesions; increased visual evoked potential P100 latency; and a previous history of optic neuritis. No correlation was found between P100 latency, duration of disease and pupillometric parameters. Our results indicate that in MS patients there is autonomic dysfunction with a reduction of parasympathetic tone and a relative increase in sympathetic dilatator tone to the pupils. We suggest that pupillary abnormalities could be due to non-specific impairment of the central pathways subserving pupil functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lumsden CE. The neuropathology of multiple sclerosis. In: Vinken PJ, Bruyn GW, eds.Handbook of Clinical Neurology, vol. 9. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1970; 217–309.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hallpike JF. Clinical aspects of multiple sclerosis. In: Halloike JF, Adams CWM, Tourtellotte WW, eds.Multiple Sclerosis. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1983; 129–161.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Noronha MJ, Vas CJ, Aziz H. Autonomic dysfunction (sweating responses) in multiple sclerosis.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1968;31: 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vas CJ. Sexual impotence and some autonomic disturbances in men with multiple sclerosis.Acta Neurol Scand 1969;45: 166–182.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bradley WE. Urinary bladder dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.Neurology (Minneapolis) 1978;28: 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blaivas JG, Bhimani G, Labib KB. Vesico-urethral dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.J Urol 1979;122: 342–347.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Benarroch EE, Chang FLF. Central autonomic disorders.J Clin Neurophysiol 1993;10: 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cartlidge NEF. Autonomic function in multiple sclerosis.Brain 1972;95: 661–664.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Neubauer B, Gundersen JG. Analysis of heart rate variations in patients with multiple sclerosis.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1978;41: 417–419.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harrer G, Harrer H. Störungen autonomer Funktionen bei multipler Sklerose.Wien klin Wschr 1980;92: 613–616.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mutani R, Clemente S, Lamberti A, Monaco F. Assessment of autonomic disturbances in multiple sclerosis by measurement of heart rate responses to deep breathing and to standing.Ital J Neurol Sci 1982;2: 111–114.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Senaratne MPJ, Carrol D, Warren KG, Kappagoda T. Evidence for cardiovascular autonomic nerve dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984;47: 947–952.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sternman AB, Coyle PK, Panasci DJ, Grimson R. Disseminated abnormalities of cardiovascular autonomic functions in multiple sclerosis.Neurology 1985;36: 1665–1668.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pentland B, Ewing DJ. Cardiovascular reflexes in multiple sclerosis.Eur Neurol 1987;26: 46–50.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nordenlo AM, Boesen F, Bo Andersen E. Cardiovascular autonomic function in multiple sclerosis.J Auton Nerv Syst 1989;26: 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Anema JR, Heijenbrok MW, Faes TJC et al. Cardiovascular autonomic function in multiple sclerosis.J Neurol Sci 1989;104: 129–134.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thomaides TN, Zoukos Y, Chaudhury KR et al. Physiological assessment of aspects of autonomic function in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.J Neurol 1993;240: 139–143.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vita G, Fazio MC, Milone S et al. Cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction in multiple sclerosis is likely related to brain stem lesions.J Neurol Sci 1993;120: 82–86.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ferini-Strambi L, Filippi M, Martinelli V et al. Nocturnal sleep study in multiple sclerosis: correlations with clinical and brain magnetic resonance imaging findings.J Neurol Sci 1994;125: 194–197.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ferini-Strambi L, Rovaris M, Oldani A et al. Cardiac autonomic function during sleep and wakefulness in multiple sclerosis.J Neurol 1995;242: 639–643.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Karaszeweski JW, Reder AT, Maselli R, Brown M, Arnason BJW. Sympathetic skin responses are decreased and lymphocyte betaadrenergic receptors are increased in progressive multiple sclerosis.Ann Neurol 1990;27: 366–372.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yokota T, Matsunaga T, Okiyama R et al. Sympathetic skin response in patients with multiple sclerosis compared with patients with spinal cord transection and normal controls.Brain 1991;114: 1381–1394.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gutrecht JA, Suarez GA, Denny BE. Sympathetic skin response in multiple sclerosis.J Neurol Sci 1993;118: 88–91.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Elie B, Louboutin JP. Sympathetic skin response (SSR) is abnormal in multiple sclerosis.Muscle and Nerve 1995;18: 185–189.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shefner JM, Carter JI, Krarup C. Peripheral sensory abnormalities in patients with multiple sclerosis.Muscle and Nerve 1992;15: 73–76.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Saito H, Kobayashi K, Mochizuki H, Ishii T. Axonal degeneration of the peripheral nerves and postganglionic anhidrosis in a patient with multiple sclerosis.Tohoku J Exp Med 1990;162(3): 279–291.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lowenstein O. Pupillary reflex shapes and topical clinical diagnosis.Neurology 1955;5: 631–634.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Smith SA, Smith SE. Evidence for a neuropathic aetiology in the small pupil of diabetes mellitus.Br J Ophthalmol 1983;67: 89–93.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Brazier DJ. Iris autonomic function in acute glaucoma.Eye 1989;3: 288–293.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Micieli G, Tassorelli C, Martignoni E et al. Disordered pupil reactivity in Parkinson's disease.Clin Auton Res 1991;1: 55–58.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Herman P. The pupil and headaches.Headache 1983;23: 102–105.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jacobsen J. Pupillary function in multiple sclerosis.Acta Neurol Scand 1990;82: 392–395.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Van Diemen HAM, Van Dongen MMMM, Nauta JJP, Lanting P, Polman CH. Pupillary light reflex latency in patients with multiple sclerosis.Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1992;82: 213–219.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rossi P, Colombo B, Martinelli V et al. Pupillary light reflex abnormalities in multiple sclerosis.Ital J Clin Neurophysiol 1993: 2 (4): 243–248.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lowenstein O. Clinical pupillary symptoms in lesions of the optic nerve, chiasma, optic tract.Arch Ophthalmol 1954;52: 385–403.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Miller SD, Thompson HS. Pupil cycle time in optic neuritis.Am J Ophthalmol 1978;85: 635–642.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ellis CJK. The afferent pupillary defect in acute optic neuritis.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1979;42: 1008–1017.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fison PN, Garlick DJ, Smith SE. Assessment of unilateral pupillary defects by pupillography.Br J Ophthalmol 1979;63: 195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Alexandridis E, Argyropoulos H, Krastel H. The latent period of the pupil light reflex in lesions of the optic nerve.Ophthalmology 1981;182: 211–217.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Cox TA, Thompson HS, Corbet JJ. Relative afferent pupillary defects in optic neuritis.Am J Ophthalmol 1981;92: 685–690.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cox TA, Thompson HS, Hayreh SS, Snyder JE. Visual evoked potentials and pupillary signs. A comparison in optic nerve disease.Arch Ophthalmol 1982;100: 1603–1607.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Poser CM, Paty DM, Scheinberg L et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis. Guidelines for research protocols.Ann Neurol 1983;13: 227–231.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS).Neurology 1983;33: 1444–1452.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pozzessere G, Valle E, Rossi P et al. Pupillometric evaluation and analysis of light reflex in healthy subjects as a tool to study autonomic nervous system changes with aging.Aging Clin Exp Res 1996;8: 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Korczyn AD, Laor N, Nemet P. Sympathetic pupillary tone in old age.Arch Ophthalmol 1976;94: 1905–1906.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pozzessere G, Valle E, De Crignis S et al. Abnormalities of cognitive functions in IDDM revealed by P300 event-related potential analysis.Diabetes 1991;40: 952–958.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Halliday AM, Barret G, Halliday E, Michael WF. The topography of the pattern evoked potential. In: Desmedt JE, ed.Visual Evoked Potentials in Man: New Developments. Oxford, UK: Clatendon, 1977; 121–133.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Spekreijse H, Estevez O, Reitz D. Visual evoked potential and the physiological analysis of visual process in man. In: Desmedt JE, ed.Visual Evoked Potentials in Man: New Developments. Oxford, UK: Clarendon, 1977; 16–85.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Loewenfeld IE, Newsome DA. Iris mechanisms: influence of pupil size on dynamics of pupillary movements.Am J Ophthalmol 1971;71: 347–351.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Heller PH, Perry F, Jewett LD, Levine JD. Autonomic components of the human pupillary light reflex.Invest Ophtalmol Vis Sci 1990;31: 156–162.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Walsh B, Hoyt WF.Clinical Neurophthalmolgy. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lowenstein O, Loewenfeld IE. Mutual role of sympathetic and parasympathetic in shaping of the pupillary reflex to light.Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1950; 64: 341–377.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Chiappa KH. Pattern shift evoked potentials; interpretation. In: Chiappa KH, ed.Evoked Potentials in Clinical Medicine. New York: Raven Press, 1983; 63–95.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ijichi Y, Kiyohara T, Hosoba M, Tsukahara N. The cerebellar control of the pupillary light reflex in the cat.Brain Res 1977;128: 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Tsukahara N, Kiyohara T, Ijichi Y. The mode of cerebellar control of pupillary light reflex.Brain Res 1973;60: 244–288.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Barris RW. A pupilloconstrictor area in the cerebral cortex of the cat and its relationship to the pretectal area.J Comp Neurol 1936;63: 353–368.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Lowenstein O, Loewenfeld IE. The pupil. In: Davson H, ed.The Eye, vol. 3. New York: Academic Press, 1962; 231–267.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wang G, Lu T, Lau T. Pupillary constriction from cortical stimulation.Chin J Physiol 1931;5: 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Carmel PW. Sympathetic deficits following thalamotomy.Arch Neurol (Chicago) 1957;18: 378–387.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Micieli G, Tassorelli C, Martignoni E, Marcheselli S, Rossi F, Nappi G. Further characterization of autonomic involvement in multiple system atrophy: a pupillometric study.Funct Neurol 1995;10: 273–280.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pozzessere, G., Rossi, P., Valle, E. et al. Autonomic involvement in multiple sclerosis: a pupillometric study. Clinical Autonomic Research 7, 315–319 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02267724

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02267724

Keywords

Navigation