Skip to main content
Log in

Duality in non-additive expected utility theory

  • Part IV New Results In Nonlinear Preference Theory
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some duality problems in expected utility theory, raised by the introduction of non-additive probabilities, are examined. These problems do not arise if the probability measure is symmetric; i.e. has the property of complementary additivity. Additional, mild properties of coherence of conditional probabilities imply full additivity of the unconditional measure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Choquet, Theory of capacities, Ann. Inst. Fourier 5(1955)131.

    Google Scholar 

  2. I. Gilboa, Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities, Journal of Mathematical Economics 16(1987)65.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Quiggin, A theory of anticipated utility, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3(1982)323.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L.J. Savage,The Foundations of Statistics (Wiley, New York, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Schmeidler, Subjective probability without additivity (1982), temporary title.

  6. D. Schmeidler, Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity, Preprint 84, Institute for Mathematics and Its Applications, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Schmeidler, Integral representation without additivity, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 97(1986)255.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Yaari, The dual theory of choice under risk, Econometrica 55(1987)95.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilboa, I. Duality in non-additive expected utility theory. Ann Oper Res 19, 405–414 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02283531

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02283531

Keywords

Navigation