Skip to main content
Log in

Fitting the factor analysis model

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When the covariance matrix Σ(p×P) does not satisfy the formal factor analysis model for m factors, there will be no factor matrix Λ(p×m) such that γ=(Σ-ΛΛ′) is diagonal. The factor analysis model may then be replaced by a tautology where γ is regarded as the covariance matrix of a set of “residual variates.” These residual variates are linear combinations of “discarded” common factors and unique factors and are correlated. Maximum likelihood, alpha and iterated principal factor analysis are compared in terms of the manner in which γ is defined, a “maximum determinant” derivation for alpha factor analysis being given. Weighted least squares solutions using residual variances and common variances as weights are derived for comparison with the maximum likelihood and alpha solutions. It is shown that the covariance matrix γ defined by maximum likelihood factor analysis is Gramian, provided that all diagonal elements are nonnegative. Other methods can define a γ which is nonGramian even when all diagonal elements are nonnegative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, T. W., & Rubin, H. Statistical inference in factor analysis. In J. Neyman (Ed.),Proceedings of the third Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability. Vol. V. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1956. Pp. 111–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargmann, R. E.A study of independence and dependence in multivariate normal analysis. Chapel Hill, N. C.: Univ. of North Carolina, Institute of Statistics (Mineograph Series No. 186), 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W. A comparison of factor analytic techniques.Psychometrika, 1968,33, 267–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. Some necessary conditions for common factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1954,19, 149–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, H. H., & Fukuda, Y. Resolution of the Heywood case in the minres solution.Psychometrika, 1966,31, 563–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, H. H., & Jones, W. H. Factor analysis by minimizing residuals (minres).Psychometrika, 1966,31, 351–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. W. Some Rao-Guttman relationships.Psychometrika, 1962,27, 247–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst, P.Factor analysis of data matrices. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, W. G. Some contributions to factor analysis. Oak Ridge, Tenn.: Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Report No. ORNL-1919), 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G.Statistical estimation in factor analysis. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. Some contributions to maximum likelihood factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1967,32, 443–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. F., & Caffrey, J. Alpha factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1965,30, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawley, D. N. The estimation of factor loadings by the method of maximum likelihood.Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Series A, 1940,60, 64–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawley, D. N. Further investigations in factor estimation.Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Series A, 1941,61, 176–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, W. On the rank of the reduced correlational matrix in multiple factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1937,2, 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick, M. R., & Lewis, C. Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements.Psychometrika, 1967,32, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrowski, A. M. A quantitative formulation of Sylvester's Law of Inertia.Proceedings of the National Acaemy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1959,45, 740–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R. Estimation and tests of significance in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1955,20, 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozeboom, W. W. Linear correlations between sets of variables.Psychometrika, 1965,30, 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, G. H. Hotelling's method modified to give Spearman's g.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1934,25, 366–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L. R., Koopman, R. F., & Linn, R. L. Evaluation of factor analytic research procedures by means of simulated correlation matrices. ONR Technical Report, Contracts Nonr 1834(39) and U. S. Navy/00014-67-A-0305-0003. Urbana, Ill., University of Illinois, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

A modified version of this paper forms part of a Ph.D. thesis submitted to the University of South Africa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Browne, M.W. Fitting the factor analysis model. Psychometrika 34, 375–394 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289365

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289365

Keywords

Navigation