Skip to main content
Log in

Negative relationships between abilities

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Abilities are usually assumed to exist in a “positive manifold.” Experimental manipulations of physiological variables, however, suggest that negative relationships exist between certain of the neural processes contributing to simple perceptual-motor vs. perceptual-restructuring tasks. First-order correlative evidence of this phenomenon cannot be obtained because the between-individual differences in general ability level tend to exceed the behavioral effects of the intra-individual opposition between neural processes. Also, since statistical removal of the “g” variance induces bipolarity in the remaining variance, the second-order negative correlations are necessarily regarded as artifactual. A combined correlational-experimental approach is suggested to overcome this difficulty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Broverman, D. M. Normative and ipsative measurement in psychology.Psychological Review, 1962,69, 295–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, D. M., Broverman, Inge K., Vogel, W., Palmer, R. D., & Klaiber, E. L. The automatization cognitive style and physical development.Child Development, 1964,35, 1343–1359.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, D. M., Klaiber, E. L., Kobayashi, Y., & Vogel, W. The roles of activation and inhibition in sex differences in cognitive abilities.Psychological Review, 1968,75, 23–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaway III, E., & Stone, G. Re-evaluating focus of attention. In L. Uhr & J. G. Miller (Eds.),Drugs and behavior. New York: Wiley & Sons, 1960, pp. 393–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, P. L. Some effects of scopolamine, atropine, and amphetamine in three behavioral situations.Pharmacologist, 1961,3, 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, R. L., & Shipley, R. A.Androgens. New York: J. Wiley & Sons, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman, E. A. Development of a behavior taxonomy for describing human tasks: a correlational-experimental approach.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1967,51, 1–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gainer, W. L. The ability of the WISC subtests to discriminate between boys and girls of average intelligence.California Journal of Educational Research, 1962,13, 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, W. R.Diencephalon, autonomic and extrapyramidal functions. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaiber, E. L., Broverman, D. M., & Kobayashi, Y. The automatization cognitive style, androgens, and monoamine oxidase.Psychopharmacologia, 1967,11, 320–336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohs, S. C.Intelligence measurement. New York: Macmillan, 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMeeken, A. M.The intelligence of a representative group of Scottish children. London: University of London Press, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, D. The language development of the preschool child.University of Minnesota Institute of Child Welfare Monograph, 1930,4, 174.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNemar, Q.The revision of the Stanford-Binet Scale: An analysis of the standardization data. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miele, J. A. Sex differences in intelligence: the relationship of sex to intelligence as measured by the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children.Dissertation Abstracts, 1958,18, 2213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, R. D. Sex differences and other aspects of young superior adult performance on the Wechsler Bellevue.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1953,17, 411–418.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Podell, J. E., & Phillips, L. A developmental analysis of cognition as observed in dimensions of Rorschach and objective test performance.Journal of Personality, 1959,27, 439–463.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. The relation between test and person factors.Psychological Review, 1963,70, 432–443.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, F. Sex differences in reading achievement.Journal of Educational Research, 1943,36, 594–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneidler, G. R. & Paterson, D. G. Sex differences in clerical aptitude.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1942,33, 303–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnell H. Sex differences in relation to stuttering: Part II.Journal of Speech Disorders, 1947,12, 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, S. Monoamine oxidase in control of brain serotonin and norepinephrine content.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1963,107, 856–864.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stroop, J. R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1935,18, 643–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, J. M.Growth at adolecence. (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. Unitary abilities.Journal of General Psychology, 1934,11, 126–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L.The vectors of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L.A factorial study of perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, T. W., Thurstone, L. L., & Strandskov, H. H. A psychological study of twins. 2. Scores of one hundred and twenty-five pairs of twins on fifty-nine tests. The Psychometric Laboratory, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N. C., 1955, No. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiffin, J., & Asher, E. J. The Purdue Pegboard: Norms and studies of reliability and validity.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1948,32, 234–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wada, J. A., Wrinch, J., Hill, D., McGeer, P. L., & McGeer, E. G. Central aromatic amine levels and behavior.Archives of Neurology, 1963,9, 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D.Wechsler adult intelligence scale. New York: Psychological Corporation, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, H. A. Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures.Journal of Personality, 1950,19, 1–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., Faterson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R., & Karp, S. A.Psychological differentiation. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported in part by the Dementia Praecox Research Project, Worcester State Hospital, and research grant HD 02557 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, U. S. Public Health Service.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Broverman, D.M., Klaiber, E.L. Negative relationships between abilities. Psychometrika 34, 5–20 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02290169

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02290169

Keywords

Navigation