Skip to main content
Log in

A maximum likelihood method for fitting the wandering vector model

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After introducing some extensions of a recently proposed probabilistic vector model for representing paired comparisons choice data, an iterative procedure for obtaining maximum likelihood estimates of the model parameters is developed. The possibility of testing various hypotheses by means of likelihood ratio tests is discussed. Finally, the algorithm is applied to some existing data sets for illustrative purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike, H. On entropy maximization principle. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.),Applications of statistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1977, 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya, T. The maximum likelihood, the minimum chi-square and the nonlinear weighted least-squares method in the general qualitative response model.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1976,71, 247–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, G. G.Multidimensional preference scaling. The Hague: Mouton, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R. D., & Jones, L. V.The measurement of prediction of judgment and choice. San Francisco: Holden-Day, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. D. Individual differences and multidimensional scaling. In R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney, & S. B. Nerlove (Eds.),Multidimensional scaling: Theory and Applications in the behavioral sciences (Vol. 1). New York: Seminar Press, 1972, 105–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. D. Models and methods for multidimensional analysis of preferential choice (or other dominance) data. In E. D. Lantermann & H. Feger (Eds.),Similarity and choice. Bern: Huber, 1980, 234–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, C. H.A theory of data. New York: Wiley, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Soete, G. On the relation between two generalized cases of Thurstone's Law of Comparative Judgment.Mathématiques et Sciences humaines, 1983,21, 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halff, H. M. Choice theories for differentially comparable alternatives.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1976,14, 244–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiser, W., & De Leeuw, J. Multidimensional mapping of preference data.Mathématiques et Sciences humaines. 1981,19, 39–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennrich, R. I., & Moore, R. H. Maximum likelihood estimation by means of nonlinear least squares.Proceedings of the American Statistical Association—Statistical Computing Section, 1975, 57–65.

  • Jones, L. V., & Jeffrey, T. E. A quantitative analysis of expressed preferences for compensation plans.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1964,48, 201–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B. Factor analysis and principal components. I. Bilinear models. In W. H. Kruskal & J. M. Tanur (Eds.),International encyclopedia of statistics. (Vol. 1). New York: The Free Press, 1978, 307–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. Quantal choice analysis: a survey,Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 1976,5, 363–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, J. O. Maximum likelihood estimation in multidimensional scaling.Psychometrika, 1977,42, 241–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, J. O. The joint analysis of direct ratings, pairwise preferences, and dissimilarities.Psychometrika, 1980,45, 149–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskam, E. E., & Lingoes, J. C. MINISSA-I: Fortran IV(G) program for the smallest space analysis of square symmetric matrices.Behavioral Science, 1970,15, 204–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffé, H. An analysis of variance for paired comparisons.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1952,47, 381–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönemann, P. H., & Tucker, L. R. A maximum likelihood solution for the method of successive intervals allowing for unequal stimulus dispersions.Psychometrika, 1967,32, 403–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. Successive intervals scaling of paired comparisons.Psychometrika, 1967,32, 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. Choice frequency and similarity.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1977,18, 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L., & Capozza, D. Preference and cognitive structure of Italian political parties.Italian Journal of Psychology, 1975,2, 391–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, P. The analysis of personal preferences.British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1960,13, 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takane, Y. A maximum likelihood method for nonmetric multidimensional scaling: I. The case in which all empirical orderings are independent—Theory.Japanese Psychological Research, 1978,20, 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takane, Y. Maximum likelihood estimation in the generalized case of Thurstone's model of comparative judgement.Japanese Psychological Research, 1980,22, 188–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takane, Y. Multidimensional successive categories scaling: a maximum likelihood method.Psychometrika, 1981,46, 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takane, Y., & Carroll, J. D. Nonmetric maximum likelihood multidimensional scaling from directional rankings of similarities.Psychometrika, 1981,46, 389–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. A law of comparative judgment.Psychological Review, 1927,34, 273–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L. R. Intra-individual and inter-individual multidimensionality. In H. Gulliksen & S. Messick (Eds.),Psychological scaling: theory and applications. New York: Wiley, 1960, 155–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, S. S.Mathematical Statistics. New York: Wiley, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The first author is “Aspirant” of the Belgian “Nationaal Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek.” Part of the research reported in this paper was done while the first author stayed at the L. L. Thurstone Psychometric Laboratory of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill supported by a CRB Fellowship of the Belgian American Educational Foundation, Inc. The authors wish to express their gratitude to Thomas S. Wallsten and Joseph B. Kruskal for helpful discussions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Soete, G., Carroll, J.D. A maximum likelihood method for fitting the wandering vector model. Psychometrika 48, 553–566 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293879

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293879

Key words

Navigation