Skip to main content
Log in

The joint analysis of direct ratings, pairwise preferences, and dissimilarities

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In studies involving judgments of similarity or dissimilarity, a variety of other variables may also be measured. Examples might be direct ratings of the stimuli, pairwise preference judgments, and physical measurements of the stimuli with respect to various properties. In such cases, there are important advantages to joint analyses of the dissimilarity and collateral variables. A variety of models are described for relating these and algorithms described for fitting these to data. A number of hypothesis tests are developed and an example offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference notes

  • System/360 Scientific Subroutine Package, Version III. White Plains, N. Y.: International Business Machines Corporation, 1970.

  • Takane, Y.Multidimensional successive categories scaling: A maximum likelihood method. Paper presented at the joint meeting of the Psychometric Society and the European Mathematical Psychology Group, Uppsala, Sweden, 1978.

  • Bookstein, A. Personal communication, 1978.

References

  • Bechtel, G.Multidimensional preference scaling. The Hague: Mouton, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloxom, B. Constrained multidimensional scaling inN spaces.Psychometrika, 1978,43, 397–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. D. Individual differences and multidimensional scaling. In R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney, and S. B. Nerlove (Eds.).Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences, Vol. 1. New York: Seminar Press, 1972, 105–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duder, S. & Aronson, J. Values in the admission process: An application of multidimensional scaling.Canadian Journal of Social Work Education, 1978,4, 56–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hare, D. Individual differences in perceived similarity and preference for visual art: A multidimensional scaling analysis.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,20, 445–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, J. O. & Case, B. Attitude measurement and the linear model.Psychological Bulletin, 1970,74, 185–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, J. O. Maximum likelihood estimation in multidimensional scaling.Psychometrika, 1977,42, 241–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, J. O. Confidence regions for multidimensional scaling analysis.Psychometrika, 1978,43, 145–160 (a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, J. O.MULTISCALE: Four programs for multidimensional scaling by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago: National Educational Resources, Inc., 1978 (b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, J. O. Some small sample results for maximum likelihood estimation in multidimensional scaling.Psychometrika, 1980,45, 141–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. M., Bassili, J. N., & Aboud, F. E. Dimensions of ethnic identity: An example from Quebec.Journal of Social Psychology, 1973,89, 185–192.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research reported here was supported by grant number APA 320 to the author by the National Research Council of Canada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramsay, J.O. The joint analysis of direct ratings, pairwise preferences, and dissimilarities. Psychometrika 45, 149–165 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294074

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294074

Key words

Navigation