Skip to main content
Log in

Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: III. Valued relations

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper generalizes thep* model for dichotomous social network data (Wasserman & Pattison, 1996) to the polytomous case. The generalization is achieved by transforming valued social networks into three-way binary arrays. This data transformation requires a modification of the Hammersley-Clifford theorem that underpins thep* class of models. We demonstrate that, provided that certain (non-observed) data patterns are excluded from consideration, a suitable version of the theorem can be developed. We also show that the approach amounts to a model for multiple logits derived from a pseudo-likelihood function. Estimation within this model is analogous to the separate fitting of multinomial baseline logits, except that the Hammersley-Clifford theorem requires the equating of certain parameters across logits. The paper describes how to convert a valued network into a data array suitable for fitting the model and provides some illustrative empirical examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agresti, A. (1990).Categorical data analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C.J., & Wasserman, S. (1995). Log multiplicative models for valued social relations.Sociological Methods & Research, 24, 96–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C.J., Wasserman, S., & Crouch, B. (in press). Ap* primer: logit models for social networks.Social Networks.

  • Bearman, P. (1997). Generalized exchange.American Journal of Sociology, 102, 1383–1415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begg, C.B., & Gray, R. (1984). Calculation of polychotomous logistic regression parameters using individualized regressions.Biometrika, 71, 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besag, J.E. (1972). Nearest neighbour systems and the auto-logistic model for binary data.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 34, 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besag, J.E. (1974). Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems (with discussion).Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 36, 192–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besag, J.E. (1975). Statistical analysis of nonlattice data.The Statistician, 24, 179–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besag, J.E. (1977a). Some methods of statistical analysis for spatial data.Bulletin of the International Statistical Association, 47, 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besag, J.E. (1977b). Efficiency of pseudo-likelihood estimation for simple Gaussian random fields.Biometrika, 64, 616–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besag, J.E., & Clifford, P. (1989, May). Generalized Monte Carlo significance tests.Biometrika, 76, 633–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, B., & Wasserman, S. (1998). Fittingp*: Monte Carlo maximum likelihood estimation. Paper presented at International Conference on Social Networks, Barcelona, Spain.

  • Faust, K., & Wasserman, S. (1993). Association and correlational models for studying measurements on ordinal relations. In P.V. Marsden (Ed.),Sociological methodology 1993 (pp. 177–215). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, O., & Strauss, D. (1986). Markov graphs.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 832–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyer, C. J., & Thompson, E.A. (1992). Constrained Monte Carlo maximum likelihood for dependent data.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 54, 657–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, J. M., & Clifford, P. (1971).Markov fields on finite graphs and lattices. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Hosmer, D.W., & Lemeshow, S. (1989).Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ising, E. (1925). Beitrag zur theorie des ferromagnetismus. [Contribution to the theory of ferromagnetism].Zeitschrift fur Physik, 31, 253–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, E.C. (1986). Structure and process: agreement models for friendship formation.Social Networks, 8, 257–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauritzen, S.L. (1996).Graphical models. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazega, E., & Pattison, P. (1998). Social capital, multiplex generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: A case study. Submitted toSocial Networks.

  • Norusis, M.J. (1990).SPSS advanced statistics user's guide. Chicago: SPSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattison, P., & Wasserman, S. (in press). Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: II. Multivariate relations.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology.

  • Preisler, H. (1993). Modeling spatial patterns of trees attacked by bark-beetles.Applied Statistics, 42, 501–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennolls, K. (1995).p 1/2. In M.G. Everett & K. Rennolls (Eds.),Proceedings of the 1995 International Conference on Social Networks, Vol. 1. (pp. 151–160). London: Greenwich University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, G.L. (1997, February).p* models of social influence. Paper presented at the International Sunbelt Social Network Conference, San Diego, CA.

  • Robins, G.L. (1998).Personal attributes in inter-personal contexts: Statistical models for individual characteristics and social relationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, G.L., Pattison, P., & Langan-Fox, J. (1995, July). Group effectiveness: A comparative analysis of interactional structure and group performance in organizational workgroups. Paper presented at International Social Networks Conference, London.

  • Strauss, D. (1992). The many faces of logistic regression.The American Statistician, 46, 321–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, D., & Ikeda, M. (1990). Pseudolikelihood estimation for social networks.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 204–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, M. (1981).Relational analysis: An applied evaluation. Unpublished Master of Science thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne.

  • Vickers, M., & Chan, S. (1981).Representing classroom social structure. Melbourne: Victoria Institute of Secondary Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S. (1987). Conformity of two sociometric relations.Psychometrika, 52, 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1989). Canonical analysis of composition and structure of social networks. In C.C. Clogg (Ed.),Sociological methodology 1989 (pp. 1–42). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994).Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., Faust, K., & Galaskiewicz, J. (1990). Correspondence and canonical analysis of relational data.Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 15, 11–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Iacobucci, D. (1986). Statistical analysis of discrete relational data.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 39, 41–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Pattison, P. (1996). Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks. I: An introduction to Markov graphs and p*.Psychometrika, 60, 401–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Pattison, P. (1999).Multivariate random graph distributions. (Springer Lecture Notes Series in Statistics). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, G.Y., & Wang, Y.J. (1995). Exponential models for polytomous stochastic networks. Unpublished manuscript.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by grants from the Australian Research Council, the National Science Foundation (#SBR96-30754), and the National Institute of Health (#PHS-1RO1-39829-01).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robins, G., Pattison, P. & Wasserman, S. Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: III. Valued relations. Psychometrika 64, 371–394 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294302

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294302

Key words

Navigation