Skip to main content
Log in

The partial credit model and null categories

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A category where the frequency of responses is zero, either for sampling or structural reasons, will be called anull category. One approach for ordered polytomous item response models is to downcode the categories (i.e., reduce the score of each category above the null category by one), thus altering the relationship between the substantive framework and the scoring scheme for items with null categories. It is discussed why this is often not a good idea, and a method for avoiding the problem is described for the partial credit model while maintaining the integrity of the original response framework. This solution is based on a simple reexpression of the basic parameters of the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, R. A., & Khoo, S. T. (1992).Quest [computer program]. Hawthorn, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, E. B. (1972). The numerical solution of a set of conditional estimation equations.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 34, 42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, E. B. (1973). Conditional inference for multiple choice questionnaires.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 26, 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, E. B. (1977). Sufficient statistics and latent trait models.Psychometrika, 42, 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, E. B. (1983). A general latent structure model for contingency table data. In, H. Wainer & S. Messick (Eds.),Principals of modern psychological measurement (pp. 117–138). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982).Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, S. (1977).The analysis of cross-classified categorical data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. H. (1974).Einführing in die theorie psychologischer tests [Introduction to the theory of psychological tests]. Berne: Huber Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G., & Parzer, P. (1991). An extension of the rating scale model with an application to the measurement of change.Psychometrika, 56, 637–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glas, C. A. W. (1989).Contributions to estimating and testing Rasch models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Twente University, Twente, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glas, C. A. W. (1991, April).Testing Rasch models for polytomous items with an example concerning detection of item bias. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Association, Chicago.

  • Gustafsson, J. E. (1980). Testing and obtaining fit of data to the Rasch model.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 33, 205–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, P. G. W., & Roskam, E. E. (1986). Latent trait models and dichotomization of graded responses.Psychometrika, 51, 69–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring.Psychometrika, 47, 149–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, G. N., & Wright, B. D. (1984). The essential process in a family of measurement models.Psychometrika, 49, 529–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1960).Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Denmark's Paedagogistic Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romberg, T. A., Collis, K. F., Donovan, B. F., Buchanan, A. E., & Romberg, M. N. (1982).The development of mathematical problem solving superitems (Report of NIE/EC Item Development Project). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romberg, T. A., Jurdak, M. E., Collis, K. F., & Buchanan, A. E. (1982).Construct validity of a set of mathematical superitems (Report on NIE/ECS Item Development Project). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. L., Day, R., & Romberg, T. A. (1988).Evaluation of the use of “Exploring Data” and “Exploring Probability”. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M., & Adams, R. A. (in press). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation for the ordered partition model.Journal of Educational Statistics.

  • Wright, B., Congdon, R., & Schultz, M. (1988).MSTEPS [computer program]. Chicago: University of Chicago, MESA Psychometrics Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B., & Masters, G. N. (1982).Rating scale analysis. Chicago: MESA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B., Masters, G. N., & Ludlow, L. H. (1982).CREDIT [computer program]. Chicago: MESA Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We are indebted to the editor, associate editor, and three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and thorough review of the manuscript. The first author's work was supported by a National Academy of Education Spencer Fellowship.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, M., Masters, G.N. The partial credit model and null categories. Psychometrika 58, 87–99 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294473

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294473

Key words

Navigation