Abstract
A category where the frequency of responses is zero, either for sampling or structural reasons, will be called anull category. One approach for ordered polytomous item response models is to downcode the categories (i.e., reduce the score of each category above the null category by one), thus altering the relationship between the substantive framework and the scoring scheme for items with null categories. It is discussed why this is often not a good idea, and a method for avoiding the problem is described for the partial credit model while maintaining the integrity of the original response framework. This solution is based on a simple reexpression of the basic parameters of the model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, R. A., & Khoo, S. T. (1992).Quest [computer program]. Hawthorn, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Andersen, E. B. (1972). The numerical solution of a set of conditional estimation equations.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 34, 42–50.
Andersen, E. B. (1973). Conditional inference for multiple choice questionnaires.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 26, 31–44.
Andersen, E. B. (1977). Sufficient statistics and latent trait models.Psychometrika, 42, 69–81.
Andersen, E. B. (1983). A general latent structure model for contingency table data. In, H. Wainer & S. Messick (Eds.),Principals of modern psychological measurement (pp. 117–138). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982).Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.
Fienberg, S. (1977).The analysis of cross-classified categorical data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fischer, G. H. (1974).Einführing in die theorie psychologischer tests [Introduction to the theory of psychological tests]. Berne: Huber Verlag.
Fischer, G., & Parzer, P. (1991). An extension of the rating scale model with an application to the measurement of change.Psychometrika, 56, 637–652.
Glas, C. A. W. (1989).Contributions to estimating and testing Rasch models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Twente University, Twente, The Netherlands.
Glas, C. A. W. (1991, April).Testing Rasch models for polytomous items with an example concerning detection of item bias. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Association, Chicago.
Gustafsson, J. E. (1980). Testing and obtaining fit of data to the Rasch model.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 33, 205–233.
Jansen, P. G. W., & Roskam, E. E. (1986). Latent trait models and dichotomization of graded responses.Psychometrika, 51, 69–91.
Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring.Psychometrika, 47, 149–174.
Masters, G. N., & Wright, B. D. (1984). The essential process in a family of measurement models.Psychometrika, 49, 529–544.
Rasch, G. (1960).Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Denmark's Paedagogistic Institut.
Romberg, T. A., Collis, K. F., Donovan, B. F., Buchanan, A. E., & Romberg, M. N. (1982).The development of mathematical problem solving superitems (Report of NIE/EC Item Development Project). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
Romberg, T. A., Jurdak, M. E., Collis, K. F., & Buchanan, A. E. (1982).Construct validity of a set of mathematical superitems (Report on NIE/ECS Item Development Project). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
Webb, N. L., Day, R., & Romberg, T. A. (1988).Evaluation of the use of “Exploring Data” and “Exploring Probability”. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
Wilson, M., & Adams, R. A. (in press). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation for the ordered partition model.Journal of Educational Statistics.
Wright, B., Congdon, R., & Schultz, M. (1988).MSTEPS [computer program]. Chicago: University of Chicago, MESA Psychometrics Laboratory.
Wright, B., & Masters, G. N. (1982).Rating scale analysis. Chicago: MESA Press.
Wright, B., Masters, G. N., & Ludlow, L. H. (1982).CREDIT [computer program]. Chicago: MESA Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We are indebted to the editor, associate editor, and three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and thorough review of the manuscript. The first author's work was supported by a National Academy of Education Spencer Fellowship.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, M., Masters, G.N. The partial credit model and null categories. Psychometrika 58, 87–99 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294473
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294473