Abstract
This paper generalizes thep* class of models for social network data to predict individual-level attributes from network ties. Thep* model for social networks permits the modeling of social relationships in terms of particular local relational or network configurations. In this paper we present methods for modeling attribute measures in terms of network ties, and so constructp* models for the patterns of social influence within a network. Attribute variables are included in a directed dependence graph and the Hammersley-Clifford theorem is employed to derive probability models whose parameters can be estimated using maximum pseudo-likelihood. The models are compared to existing network effects models. They can be interpreted in terms of public or private social influence phenomena within groups. The models are illustrated by an empirical example involving a training course, with trainees' reactions to aspects of the course found to relate to those of their network partners.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow, H., & McGrath, J.E. (1995). Membership dynamics in groups at work: A theoretical framework. In L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw (Eds.),Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 17 (pp. 373–411). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Besag, J.E. (1974). Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 36, 96–127.
Besag, J.E., & Clifford, P. (1989). Generalized Monte Carlo significance tests.Biometrika, 76, 633–642.
Burt, R.S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence.American Journal of Sociology, 92, 205–211.
Burt, R.S. (1992).Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Carley, K. (1986). An approach for relating social structure to cognitive structure.Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 12, 137–189.
Carley, K. (1989). The value of cognitive foundations for dynamic social theory.Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 14, 171–208.
Cox, D.R., & Wermuth, N. (1996).Multivariate dependencies—Models, analysis and interpretation. London: Chapman & Hall.
Crouch, B., & Wasserman, S. (1988, May). Fittingp*: Monte Carlo maximum likelihood estimation. Paper presented at International Conference on Social Networks, Barcelona, Spain.
Doreian, P. (1982). Maximum likelihood methods for linear models.Sociological Methods & Research, 10, 243–269.
Dunn, W.N., & Ginsberg, A. (1986). A sociocognitive network approach to organizational analysis.Human Relations, 40, 955–976.
Edwards, D. (1995).Introduction to graphical modelling. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Elliott, P. (2000).Statistical models for the relationship between personal attributes and social ties: Applications to adolescent female peer groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Melbourne, Department of Psychology.
Erbring, L., & Young, A.A. (1979). Individuals and social structure: Contextual effects as endogenous feedback.Sociological Methods & Research, 7, 396–430.
Erickson, B.H. (1988). The relational basis of attitudes. In B. Wellman & S.D. Berkowitz (Eds.),Social structures: A network approach (pp. 99–121). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Frank, O., & Strauss, D. (1986). Markov graphs.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 832–842.
Friedkin, N.E. (1993). Structural bases of interpersonal influence in groups: A longitudinal case study.American Sociological Review, 58, 861–872.
Friedkin, N.E. (1998).A structural theory of social influence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Friedkin, N.E., & Johnsen, E.C. (1990). Social influence and opinions.Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 15, 193–205.
Friedkin, N.E., & Johnsen, E.C. (1997). Social positions in influence networks.Social Networks, 19, 210–222.
Geyer, C.J., & Thompson, E.A. (1992). Constrained Monte Carlo maximum likelihood for dependent data.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 54, 657–699.
Holland, P.W., & Leinhardt, S. (1981). An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs (with discussion).Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 33–65.
Krackhardt, D. (1997, February).Identity, control and Simmelian ties. Paper presented at The White Tie Event in honour of Harrison White, San Diego, CA.
Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor?Journal of Management, 20, 403–437.
Latane, B., & L'Herrou, T. (1996). Spatial clustering in the conformity game: Dynamic social impact in electronic groups.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1218–1230.
Lauritzen, S.L. (1996).Graphical models. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Lauritzen, S.L., & Spiegelhalter, D.J. (1988). Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 50, 157–224.
Leenders, R.Th.A.J. (1997). Longitudinal behavior of network structure and actor attributes: Modeling interdependence of contagion and selection. In P. Doreian & F.N. Stokman (Eds.),Evolution of social networks (pp. 165–184). Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach.
Leifer, E. (1988). Interaction preludes to role-setting: Exploratory local action.American Sociological Review, 53, 865–878.
Markovsky, B., & Chaffee, M. (1995). Social identity and solidarity. In B. Markovsky, K. Heimer, & J. O'Brien (Eds.),Advance in group processes, Vol. 12 (pp. 249–270). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Markovsky, B., & Lawler, E.J. (1994). A new theory of group solidarity. In B. Markovsky, K. Heimer, & J. O'Brien (Eds.),Advance in group processes, Vol. 11 (pp. 113–137). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Marsden, P.V., & Friedkin, N.E. (1994). Network studies of social influence. In S. Wasserman & J. Galaskiewicz (Eds.),Advances in social network analysis (pp. 3–25). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Moscovici, S. (1985). Social influence and conformity. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.),Handbook of social psychology: Volume II Special fields and applications. (pp. 347–412). New York, NY: Random House.
Moscovici, S. & Doise, W. (1994).Conflict and consensus: A general theory of collective decisions (W.D. Halls, Trans.), London: Sage.
Pattison, P. (1994). Social cognition in context. In S. Wasserman & J. Galaskiewicz (Eds.),Advances in social network analysis (pp. 79–109). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pattison, P., & Robins, G.L. (2000, April).Neighbourhood-based models for social networks: Beyond Markovian neighbourhoods. Paper presented at International Sunbelt Social Network Conference.
Pattison, P. & Wasserman, S. (1999). Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: II. Multivariate relations.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 52, 169–193.
Prendergast, J.F., Gange, S.J., Newton, M.A., Lindstrom, M.J., Palta, M., & Fisher, M.R. (1996). A survey of methods for analyzing clustered binary response data.International Statistical Review, 64, 89–118.
Robins, G.L. (1998).Personal attributes in interpersonal contexts: Statistical models for individual characteristics and social relationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Melbourne, Department of Psychology.
Robins, G.L., Elliott, P., & Pattison, P. (2001).Network models for social selection processes.Social Networks, 23, 1–30.
Robins, G.L., Pattison, P., & Wasserman, S. (1999). Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: III. Valued relations.Psychometrika, 64, 371–394.
Schein, E.H. (1985).Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sherif, M. (1964).The psychology of group norms. New York, NY: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1936)
Sherif, M., Harvey, O.J., White, B.J., Hood, W.R., & Sherif, C.W. (1988).Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The robber's cave experiment. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma. (Original work published 1961)
Stokman, F.N., & Zeggelink, E.P.H. (1996). Self organizing friendship networks. In W.B.G. Liebrand & D.M. Messick (Eds.),Frontiers in social dilemmas research (pp. 385–418). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Strauss, D., & Ikeda, M. (1990). Pseudolikelihood estimation for social networks.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 204–212.
Van de Bunt, G.G., Van Duijn, M.A.J., & Snijders, T.A.B. (1999). Friendship networks through time: An actor-oriented dynamic statistical network model.Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 5, 167–192.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994).Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wasserman, S., & Pattison, P. (1996). Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs andp*.Psychometrika, 61, 401–425.
Weick, K.E., & Roberts, K.H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks.Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 357–381.
Wermuth, N., & Lauritzen, S.L. (1990). On substantive research hypotheses, conditional independence graphs and graphical chain models.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 52, 21–50.
Whittaker, J. (1990).Graphical models in applied multivariate statistics. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Winsborough, H.H., Quarantelli, E.L., & Yutzky, D. (1963). The similarity of connected observations.American Sociological Review, 28, 977–983.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by grants from the Australian Research Council. The authors would like to acknowledge the help of Stanley Wasserman, Janice Langan-Fox and Larry Hubert, and would like to thank four anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. Earlier versions of this article were presented at the North American Conference of the Psychometric Society, Lawrence, Kansas, June, 1999, and at the Australasian Mathematical Psychology Conference, Brisbane, Australia, December 1999.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Robins, G., Pattison, P. & Elliott, P. Network models for social influence processes. Psychometrika 66, 161–189 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294834
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294834