Skip to main content
Log in

Conditions for factor (in)determinacy in factor analysis

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The subject of factor indeterminacy has a vast history in factor analysis (Guttman, 1955; Lederman, 1938; Wilson, 1928). It has lead to strong differences in opinion (Steiger, 1979). The current paper gives necessary and sufficient conditions for observability of factors in terms of the parameter matrices and a finite number of variables. Five conditions are given which rigorously define indeterminacy. It is shown that (un)observable factors are (in)determinate. Specifically, the indeterminacy proof by Guttman is extended to Heywood cases. The results are illustrated by two examples and implications for indeterminacy are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, T. W., & Rubin, H. (1956). Statistical inference in factor analysis.Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium, 5, 111–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. W. (1984).An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargmann, R. E. (1957).A study of independence and dependence in multivariate normal analysis (Mimeo Series No. 186). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, Institute of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, M. S. (1937). The statistical conception of mental factors.British Journal of Psychology, 28, 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma, A. (1985). Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in Lisrel Maximum Likelihood estimation.Psychometrika, 50, 229–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W. (1968). A comparison of factor analytic techniques.Psychometrika, 33, 267–334.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cramér, H. (1946).Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, T. K. (1992). On statistical inference with parameter estimates on the boundary of the parameter space.British Journal of Statistical and Mathematical Psychology, 45, 289–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elffers, H., Bethlehem, J., & Gill, R. D. (1978). Indeterminacy problems and the interpretation of factor analysis results.Statistica Neerlandica, 32, 181–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, T. S. (1958). A method of generating best asymptotically normal estimates with application to the estimation of bacterial densities.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29, 1046–1062.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1955). The determinacy of factor score matrices with implications for five other basic problems of common-factor theory.The British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 8, 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, H. B. (1931). On finite sequences of real numbers.Proceedings of the Royal Society London, 134, 486–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, W. G. (1955).Some contributions to factor analysis (Report No. ORNL-1919). Oak Ridge: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1967). Some contributions to maximum likelihood factor analysis.Psychometrika, 32, 443–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests.Psychometrika, 36, 109–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kano, Y. (1986). A condition for the regression predictor to be consistent in a single common factor model.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 39, 221–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krijnen, W. P. (1996). Algorithms for unweighted least squares factor analysis.Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 21(2), 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krijnen, W. P. (1997).Using single factor-factor analysis as a measurement model. Submitted for publication.

  • Krijnen, W. P. (in press). A note on the parameter set for factor analysis models.Linear Algebra and its Applications.

  • Krijnen, W. P., Wansbeek, T. J., & ten Berge, J. M. F. (1996). Best linear estimators for factor scores.Communications in statistics: Theory and methods, 25, 3013–3025.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawley, D. N., & Maxwell, A. E. (1971).Factor analysis as a statistical method. Durban: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, W. (1938). The orthogonal transformations of a factorial matrix into itself.Psychometrika, 3, 181–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. Y. (1980). Estimation of covariance structure models with parameters subject to functional restraints.Psychometrika, 45, 309–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, M., & Novick, M. R. (1968).Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löwner, K. (1934). Über monotone Matrixfunctionen [On monotone matrix functions].Mathematisches Zeitschrift, 38, 177–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luenberger, D. G. (1969).Optimization by vector space methods. New York, NY: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnus, J. R., & Neudecker, H. (1991).Matrix differential calculus with applications in statistics and economics. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P. (1974). The measurement of factor indeterminacy.Psychometrika, 39, 203–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P. (1977). The indeterminacy of components and the definition of common factors.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 30, 165–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P., & Burr, E. J. (1967). A comparison of four methods of constructing factor scores.Psychometrika, 32, 381–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muirhead, R. J. (1982).Aspects of multivariate statistical theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. (1955). A generalized inverse for matrices.Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 51, 406–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneeweiss, H., & Mathes, H. (1995). Factor analysis and principal components.Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 55, 105–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schönemann, P. H., & Wang, M.-M. (1972). Some new results on factor indeterminacy.Psychometrika, 37, 61–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, P. K., & Singer, J. M. (1993).Large sample methods in statistics. New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serfling, R. J. (1980).Approximation theorems of mathematical statistics. New York, NY: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. (1986). Asymptotic distribution of test statistics in the analysis of moment structures under inequality constraints.Biometrika, 72, 133–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1904). “General Intelligence”, objectively determined and measured.American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1933). The uniqueness and exactness ofg.British Journal of Psychology, 24, 106–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H. (1979). Factor indeterminacy in the 1930's and the 1970's some interesting parallels.Psychometrika, 44, 157–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Berge, J. M. F., Krijnen, W. P. Wansbeek, T. J. & Shapiro, A. (in press). Some new results on correlation preserving factor scores prediction methods.Linear Algebra and its Applications.

  • ten Berge, J. M. F. & Nevels, K. (1977). A general solution to Mosier's oblique Procrustes problem.Psychometrika, 42, 593–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1935).The vectors of mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, G. H. (1950).The factorial analysis of human ability. London: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Driel, O. P. (1978). On various causes of improper solutions in maximum likelihood factor analysis.Psychometrika, 43, 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. S. (1978). A definition for the common-factor analysis model and the elimination of problems of factor score indeterminacy.Psychometrika, 43, 293–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. B. (1928). On hierarchical correlation systems.Proceedings, National Academy of Science, 14, 283–291.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krijnen, W.P., Dijkstra, T.K. & Gill, R.D. Conditions for factor (in)determinacy in factor analysis. Psychometrika 63, 359–367 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294860

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294860

Key words

Navigation