Skip to main content
Log in

Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the context of structural equation modeling, a general interaction model with multiple latent interaction effects is introduced. A stochastic analysis represents the nonnormal distribution of the joint indicator vector as a finite mixture of normal distributions. The Latent Moderated Structural Equations (LMS) approach is a new method developed for the analysis of the general interaction model that utilizes the mixture distribution and provides a ML estimation of model parameters by adapting the EM algorithm. The finite sample properties and the robustness of LMS are discussed. Finally, the applicability of the new method is illustrated by an empirical example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramowitz, M., & Stegun, I. A. (1971).Handbook of mathematical functions. New York, NY: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991).Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (1997).AMOS Users' Guide Version 3.6. Chicago: Small Waters Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1995).EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1993).EQS/Windows user's guide. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1995). Structural equation models that are nonlinear in latent variables. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.),Sociological methodology 1995 (Vol. 25). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1996). An alternative two stage least squares (2SLS) estimator for latent variable equations.Psychometrika, 61, 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandstädter, J., & Renner, G. (1990). Tenacious goal pursuit and flexible goal adjustment: Explication and age-related analysis of assimilative and accomodative strategies of coping.Psychology and Aging, 5, 58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975).Applied multiple regression/correlation analyses for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degenhardt, A., & Schmidt, H. (1994). Physische Leistungsvariablen als Indikatoren für die Diagnose “Klimakterium Virile” (Physical efficiency variables as indicators for the diagnosis of ‘climacterium virile’).Sexuologie, 3, 131–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., & Rubin, D.B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deusinger, I. (1998).Frankfurter Körperkonzept-Skalen [Frankfurt bodily self-concept scales]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grim, J. (1982). On numerical evaluation of maximum-likelihood estimates for finite mixtures of distributions.Kybernetika, 18(3), 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk, L.A. (1987).Structural equation modeling with LISREL. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaacson, E., & Keller, H.B. (1966).Analysis of numerical methods. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., & Wan, C.K. (1990).Interaction effects in multiple regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1989).LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: SPSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1993).New features in LISREL 8. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996).PRELIS 2: User's guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G., & Yang, F. (1996). Nonlinear structural equation models: The Kenny-Judd model with interaction effects. In G. Markoulides & R. Schumacker (Eds.),Advanced structural equation modeling (pp. 57–87). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Yang, F. (1997). Estimation of interaction models using the augmented moment matrix: Comparison of asymptotic standard errors. In W. Bandilla & F. Faulbaum (Eds.),SoftStat '97. Advances in statistical software 6 (pp. 467–478). Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1984). Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables.Psychological Bulletin, 96, 201–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A., Moosbrugger, H., Schermelleh-Engel, K., & Frank, D. (1997). A new approach to the estimation of latent interaction effects in structural equation models. In W. Bandilla & F. Faulbaum (Eds.),SoftStat '97. Advances in statistical software 6 (pp. 479–486). Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications.Biometrika, 57, 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mardia, K. V. (1974). Applications of some measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis in testing normality and robustness studies.Sankhya, Series B, 36, 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moosbrugger, H., Frank, D., & Schermelleh-Engel, K. (1991). Zur Überprüfung von latenten Moderatoreffekten mit linearen Strukturgleichungsmodellen [Estimating latent interaction effects in structural equation models].Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 12, 245–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moosbrugger, H., Schermelleh-Engel, K., & Klein, A. (1997). Methodological problems of estimating latent interaction effects.Methods of Psychological Research Online, 2, 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ping, R. A. (1996a). Latent variable and quadratic effect estimation: A two-step technique using structural equation analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 119, 166–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ping, R. A. (1996b). Latent variable regression: A technique for estimating interaction and quadratic coefficients.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 95–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redner, R. A., & Walker, H. F. (1984). Mixture densities, maximum likelihood and the EM algorithm.SIAM Review, 26, 195–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (1998). Estimating nonlinear effects using a Latent Moderated Structural Equations Approach. In R. E. Schumacker & G. A. Marcoulides (Eds.),Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling (pp. 203–238). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M. (1990).Konsistenz als Persönlichkeitseigenschaft? Moderatorvariablen in der Persönlichkeits- und Einstellungsforschung [Consistency as a personality trait? Moderator variables in personality and attitude research]. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, H. R. (1993).Numerische Mathematik [Numerical mathematics]. Stuttgart: Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiele, A. (1998).Verlust körperlicher Leistungsfähigkeit: Bewältigung des Alterns bei Männern im mittleren Lebensalter [Loss of bodily efficacy: The coping of aging for men of medium age]. Idstein, Germany: Schulz-Kirchner-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Jonsson, F. (1997).Nonlinear structural equation models: Simulation studies of the Kenny-Judd model. Uppsala: University of Uppsala.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Klein.

Additional information

This research has been supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Germany, No. Mo 474/1 and Mo 474/2. The data for the empirical example have been provided by Andreas Thiele of the University of Frankfurt, Germany. The authors are indebted to an associate editor and to three anonymous reviewers ofPsychometrika whose comments and suggestions have been very helpful.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klein, A., Moosbrugger, H. Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika 65, 457–474 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296338

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296338

Key words

Navigation