Skip to main content
Log in

Constraints to curriculum reform: Teachers and the myths of schooling

  • Development
  • Special Issue
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Curriculum reform efforts usually have ignored the culture in which curriculum is embedded. Principal components of the culture are the knowledge of teachers and the myths of this culture. Images, metaphors, and metonymies are forms of teacher knowledge that influence the manner in which teachers define their roles and implement the curriculum. Unless endeavors are made to facilitate teacher learning through the construction of new images, metaphors, and metonymies, it is unlikely that curricular reform will proceed in the intended manner. Similarly, the myths that define the customs and taboos of a culture need to be considered by instructional designers if their curricular resources are to be used as intended. The myths ofteacher as controller of students andobjectivism together might persuade teachers to adhere to the more traditional approach whereby knowledge is transferred to students in teacher-controlled activities.

This article describes theScience Vision series, a hypermedia system developed in response to a clear need for additional resources to educate teachers concerning alternative myths and their use in relation to utilizing resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bowen, C., & Dawson, G. (1991).Student and teacher outcomes: Results from national field testing with the IMS materials. Unpublished Manuscript, Florida State University, Tallahassee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carin, A. A., & Sund, R. B. (1989).Teaching science through discovery (6th ed., pp. 92–103). Columbus: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J. (1986).Classroom practice: Teachers' images in action. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, G. O. (Principal Investigator). (1991).ScienceVision. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbaz, F. L. (1983).Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitlin, A. D. (1987). Common school structures and teacher behavior. In J.W. Smyth (Ed.),Educating teachers: Changing the nature of pedagogical knowledge (pp. 107–120). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundy, S. (1987).The curriculum: Product or praxis? London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D. (1965). Messing about in science. InThe ESS Reader (pp. 37–44). Newton, MA: Elementary Science Study.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinnells, J. R. (1985).Persian mythology. New York: Peter Bedrick Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1987).The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987).Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, H. H. (1990). Beyond the workplace metaphor: The classroom as a learning setting.Theory into Practice, 29(2), 94–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munby, H., & Russell, T. (1990). Metaphor as an instructional tool in encouraging student teacher reflection.Theory into Practice, 29(2), 116–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1974). Images, propositions, and knowledge. In M. Nicholas (Ed.),Images, perception, and knowledge. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1981).Reason, truth, and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, D. P., & McCutcheon, G. (1986). The development of practical theories of teaching.Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 2(1), 50–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1963).The teaching of science as inquiry. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. (1990a). Social constructivist perspectives on the reform of science education.Australian Science Teachers Journal, 36(4), 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. (1990b). Teacher mind frames and science learning. In K. Tobin, J. B. Kahle, & B. J. Fraser (Eds.),Windows into science classrooms: Problems associated with high level cognitive learning in science (pp. 33–91). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. (1990c). Changing metaphors and beliefs: A master switch for teaching.Theory into Practice, 29(2), 122–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., & Ulerick, S. J. (1989, March).An interpretation of high school science teaching based on metaphors and beliefs for specific roles. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching.Syntheses, 80(1), 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tobin, K., Dawson, G. Constraints to curriculum reform: Teachers and the myths of schooling. ETR&D 40, 81–92 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296708

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296708

Keywords

Navigation