Skip to main content
Log in

Instructional simulation from a cognitive psychology viewpoint

  • Development
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The advent of the microcomputer has resulted in an increased interest in the design and use of instructional simulations. This type of simulation has the potential to enhance the transfer of learning by teaching complex mental and procedural tasks in an environment that approximates a real-world setting (Reigeluth & Schwartz, 1989). However, the microcomputer-based instructional simulations being produced today are often poorly designed from a psychological standpoint, and the learning environment they provide is ineffective at best. Information concerning how to specify and implement appropriate instructional designs for this type of learning medium is sparse (Alessi, 1988). This article presents implications gleaned from cognitive psychology which are important for the design of micro-computer-based instructional simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, D. (1973).Simulation and gaming: An approach to learning. Worthington, OH: Charles Jones.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alessi, S. M. (1988). Fidelity in the design of instructional simulations.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 15(2), 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (1985).Computer-based instruction: Methods and development. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., Greeno, J. G., Line, P. J., & Neves, D. M. (1981). Acquisition of problem-solving skill. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.),Cognitive skills and their acquisition (191–230). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annis, L. F., & Annis, D. (1979, April).A normative study of students' preferred study techniques. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

  • Anzi, Y., & Simon, H. A. (1979). The theory of learning by doing.Psychological Review, 86, 124–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior.Psychological Review, 6, 365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayman, P., & Mayer, R. (1984). Instructional manipulation of users' mental models for electronic calculators.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 20, 189–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R., Vye, N., & Reiser, J. (1986). Teaching thinking and problem solving.American Psychologist, 41, 1078–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braune, R. J., & Trollip, S. R. (1982). Towards an internal model in pilot training.Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 53, 996–999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.),Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1977). Training strategic study time apportionment in educable retarded children.Intelligence, 1, 94–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., & Day, J. D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from text.Educational Researcher, 10(2), 14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S. (1985, Spring). Idea amplifiers: New kinds of electronic learning environments.Educational Horizons, pp. 108–112.

  • Breuer, K., & Hajovy, H. (1987). Adaptive instructional simulations to improve learning of cognitive strategies.Educational Technology, 27(5), 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, R. R., & Brown, J. S. (1982). An investigation of computer coaching. In D. H. Sleeman & J. S. Brown (Eds.),Intelligent tutoring systems. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, C. H. (1987).A model for designing and evaluating microcomputer-based instructional games for teaching principles at the use level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M., Feltovich P., & Glazer, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices.Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, S. S., Segal, J. W., & Glazer, R. (1985).Thinking and learning skills: Vol. 2. Research and open questions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank, D. R. (1966). Simulations: A new direction in teacher education.Phi Delta Kappan, 48, 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H. K., & Annis, L. F. (1978). The effects of study techniques, study preferences, and familiarity on later recall.Journal of Experimental Education, 47, 92–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekkers, J., & Donatti, S. (1981). The interpretation of research studies on the use of simulation as an instructional strategy.Journal of Education Research, 74(6), 64–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirkes, M. A. (1985). Metacognition: Students in charge of their thinking.Roper Review, 8(2), 96–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittrich, J. E. (1977). Realism in business games: A three-game comparison.Simulation and Games, 8(2), 201–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duell, O. K. (1986). Metacognitive skills. In G. D. Phye & T. Andre (Eds.),Cognitive classroom learning: Understanding, thinking, and problem solving. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edens, K., & Gredler, M. (1990). A mechanism for screening microcomputer simulations.Educational Technology, 30(12), 46–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falmagne, R. J. (1980). The development of logical competence: A psycholinguistic perspective. In R. H. Kluwe & H. Spada (Eds.),Developmental models of thinking. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, A. D. (1989). Training consistent components of tasks: Developing an instructional system based on automatic/controlled processing principles.Human Factors, 31, 453–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, A. D., & Schneider, W. (1981). Control and automatic processing during tasks requiring sustained attention: A new approach to vigilance.Human Factors, 23, 737–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, J. R., & White, B. Y. (1989). An approach to training based upon principled task decomposition.Acta Psychologica, 71, 89–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., & Dick, W. (1983). Instructional psychology.Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 261–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., & Dick, W. (1989).Planning effective instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., & Glaser, R. (1987). Foundations in learning research. In R. Gagné (Ed.),Instructional technology: Foundations (pp. 49–83). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., & Merrill, M. D. (1990). The cognitive psychological basis for instructional design.Educational Technology, 30(12), 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D., & Gentner, D. R. (1983). Flowing waters or teaming crowds: Mental models of electricity. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.),Mental models (pp. 99–129). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving.Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer.Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R., Pelligrino, J. W., & Lesgold, A. M. (1978). Some directions for a cognitive psychology of instruction. In A. M. Lesgold & J. W. Pelligrino (Eds.),Cognitive psychology and instruction. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gredler, M. (1986). A taxonomy of computer simulations.Educational Technology, 26(4), 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, P. M. (1984).Mind and media: The effects of television, video games, and computers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, P. M. (1987). Electronic technologies, education, and cognitive development. In D. E. Berger, K. Pezdek, & W. P. Banks (Eds.),Applications of cognitive psychology: Problem solving. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greno, J. G. (1976). Cognitive objectives of instruction: Theory of knowledge for solving problems and answering questions. In D. Klahr (Ed.),Cognition and instruction (pp. 123–159). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halff, H. M., Hollan, J. D., & Hutchins, E. L. (1986). Cognitive science and military training.American Psychologist, 41, 1131–1139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasher, I., & Zachs, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 356–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M. F. (1986). How do you know what you know? Metacognitive modeling in the content areas.Journal of Reading, 29, 415–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollan, J. D., Hutchins, E. L., & Weitzmann, L. (1984). STEAMER: An interactive inspectable simulation-based training system.AI Magazine, 5, 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890).The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1981). Mental models in cognitive science. In D. A. Norman (Ed.),Perspectives on cognitive science (pp. 147–191). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983).Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N., Gibbs, G., & de Mowbray, J. (1978). Meaning, amount of processing and memory for words.Memory and Cognition, 6, 372–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Steedman, M. J. (1978). The psychology of syllogisms.Cognitive Psychology, 10, 64–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locatis, C. N., & Atkinson, F. D. (1981). Designing instructional simulations: Heuristics for training college and university faculty.Simulation and Games, 12, 333–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamuth, Z. (1979). Self-management training for children with reading problems: Effects on reading performance and sustained attention.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 3, 279–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W. (1981) Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction.Cognitive Science, 4, 333–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1989). Models for understanding.Review of Educational Research, 59, 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, D. (1987). Developing computer tools to support performing and learning complex cognitive skills. In D. E. Berger, K. Pezdek, & W. P. Banks (Eds.),Applications of cognitive psychology: Problem solving, education, and computing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, B. L. (1982a). Transitioning learning strategies research into practice: Focus on the student in technical training.Journal of Instructional Development, 5(2), 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, B. L. (1982b). Learner satisfaction and motivation: Capitalizing on strategies for positive self control.Performance and Instruction, 21(4), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, C., Solomon, L., & Bashook, P. (1976).Construction and use of written simulations. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D., & Asarnow, J. (1979). Cognitive-behavior modification and metacognitive development: Implications for the classroom. In P. C. Kendall & S. D. Hollon (Eds.),Cognitive-behavioral interventions: Theory research and procedures. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (1987). The new component design theory: Instructional design for courseware authoring.Instructional Science, 16, 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, G. L., & Fisk, A. D. (1987). Application of automatic and controlled processing theory to industrial training: The value of consistent component training.Human Factors, 29, 255–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neves, D. M., & Anderson, J. R. (1981). Knowledge compilation: Mechanisms for the automatization of cognitive skills. In: J. R. Anderson (Ed.),Cognitive skills and their acquisition (191–230). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orbach, E. (1979). Simulation games and motivation for learning.Simulation & Games, 10, 3–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1985).Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, M. (1973). Simulation/gaming techniques in teacher education.Viewpoints, 29, 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, M. (1984, October 26). Computer simulations, from the dungeons to the classroom.Publishers Weekly, pp. 64–65.

  • Reigeluth, C. M., & Schwartz, E. (1989). An instructional theory for the design of computer-based simulations.Journal of Computer Based Instruction, 16(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, A. H. (1966). Educators will hear a lot about simulation techniques.Nation's Schools, 78, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummelhart, D. E., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spriro, & W. E. Montigue (Eds.),Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, J. M., Beckchi, R. G., Redding, R. E., & Edwards, B. J. (1988).Modern training model concepts for aircrew training (Interim Report AFHRL-TR-87-34). Williams AFB, AZ: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., McLean, R., Swallow, J., & Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer-supported intentional learning environments.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(1), 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W. (1985) Training high performance skills: Fallacies and guidelines.Human Factors, 27, 285–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., & Fisk, A. D. (1982). Degree of consistent training: Improvements in search performance and automatic process development.Perception and Psychophysics, 31, 160–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfield, A. H., & Herman, D. J. (1982). Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 484–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. (Ed.). (1979). Students' perceptions of relatedness among mathematical verbal problems.Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 10, 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981).Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. (1986).Instructional simulation: Research, theory, and a case study. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Las Vegas, Nevada.

  • Spannaus, T. (1978). What is a simulation?Audiovisual Instruction, 23, 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J., & Walford, R. (1972).Simulation in the classroom. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, H. G., & Dodl, N. R. (1991, June).Teaching the idealizations: Altering science alternative conceptions with microcomputer simulations. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Educational Computing Conference, Phoenix, Arizona.

  • Williams, M., Hollan, J., & Stevens, A. (1981). An overview of STEAMER: An advanced computer-assisted instruction system for propulsion engineering.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12, 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G., & Cole, P. (1992). A review of cognitive teaching models.Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(4), 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittrock, M. C. (1986). Students' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, B. Y., & Jones, W. (1982). Increasing metacomprehension in learning disabled and normally achieving students through self-questioning training.Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 228–240.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was conducted under work unit 11232515, Unit Level Training Research Applications. The United States Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for governmental purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation thereon.

The author is grateful to D. Andrews, L. Martin, J. Mattoon, C. Gerson, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful insights and comments on earlier drafts of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thurman, R.A. Instructional simulation from a cognitive psychology viewpoint. ETR&D 41, 75–89 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297513

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297513

Keywords

Navigation