Abstract
The National Science Foundation-funded Center for Innovative Learning Technologies (CILT) is designed to be a national resource for stimulating research and development of technology-enabled solutions to critical problems in K-14 science, math, engineering and technology learning. The Center, launched at the end of 1997, is organized around four themes identified as areas where research is likely to result in major gains in teaching and learning, and sponsors research across disciplines and institutions in its four theme areas. CILT brings together experts in the fields of cognitive science, educational technologies, computer science, subject matter learning, and engineering. It engages business through an Industry Alliance Program and is also training postdoctoral students. CILT's founding organizations are SRI International's Center for Technology in Learning, University of California at Berkeley (School of Education and Department of Computer Science), Vanderbilt University's Learning Technology Center, and the Concord Consortium. Through its programs, CILT seeks to reach beyond these organizations to create a web of organizations, individuals, industries, schools, foundations, government agencies, and labs, that is devoted to the production, sharing and use of new knowledge about how learning technologies can dramatically improve the processes and outcomes of learning and teaching. This paper describes the rationale and operations of the Center, and first-year progress in defining a set of CILT partnership projects with many other institutions that came out of our national theme-team workshops.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993).Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, J.R., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned.The Journal of Learning Sciences, 4, 167–207.
Barron, B.J., Schwartz, D.L., Vye, N.J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J.D., & CTGV. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem and project-based learning.Journal of Learning Sciences.
Bransford, J.D., & Brown, A.L. (Eds.). (1998).How people learn: Brain, mind, behavior and experience. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Brown, A.L., & Campione, J.C. (1990). Communities of learning and thinking: Or a context by any other name. In D. Kuhn (Ed.),Contributions to Human Development, 21, 108–125.
Cerf, V.G., et al. (1993).National collaboratories: Applying information technologies for scientific research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Chubin, C., & Malcom, S. (1996). Policies to promote women in science, In C-S. Davis, A.B. Ginorio, C.S. Hollenshead, B.B. Lazarus, P.M. Rayman, & Associates (Eds.),The equity equation: Fostering the advancement of women in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering (pp. 1–28). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1996.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990). Technology and the design of generative learning environments.Educational Technology, 31(5), 34–40.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1992). The Jasper experiment: An exploration of issues in learning and instructional design.Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(1), 65–80.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1997).The Jasper project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment and professional development. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Dede, C., Salzman, M., & Loftin, B. (1996). The development of a virtual world for learning Newtonian mechanics. In P. Brusilovsky, P. Kommers, and N. Streitz, Eds.,Multimedia, hypermedia, and virtual reality.
Forbus, K., & Whalley, P.B. (1994). Using qualitative physics to build articulate software for thermodynamics education.Proceedings of the 12th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
Gomez, L., Fishman., B., & Pea, R. (1998, in press). The CoVis project: Building a large scale science education testbed.Interactive Learning Environments. (Special issue on telecommunications in education.)
Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis.Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 283–307.
Gordin, D., & Pea, R.D. (1995). Prospects for scientific visualization as an educational technology.Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(3), 249–279.
Greeno, J., Collins, A., & Resnick, L.B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In R. Calfee & D. Berliner (Eds.),Handbook of educational psychology.
Hagel, J., III, & Armstrong, A.G. (1997).Net.gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Harasim, L.M. (1990). (Ed.).On-line education: Perspectives on a new environment. New York: Praeger.
Harasim, L., Hiltz, S.R., Teles, L., & Turoff, M. (1995).Learning networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Harrison, S., & Dourish, P. (1996). Re-place-ing space: The roles of place and space in collaborative systems. InProceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 67–76). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Hawkins, J. (1997).The National Design Experiments Consortium: Final report. New York: Center for Children and Technology, Educational Development Center.
Herman, J., & Golan, S. (1991).Effects of standardized testing on teachers and learning: Another look (Tech. Rep. No. 334). Los Angeles: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation.
Hestenes, D. (1987) A modeling theory of physics instruction.American Journal of Physics, 53, 1056–1065.
Hiltz, S.R. (1990). Evaluating the virtual classroom. In L.M. Harasim (Ed.),On-line education: Perspective on a new environment (pp. 133–183). New York: Praeger.
Honey, M., Bennett, D., Hupert, N., Kanze, B., Meade, T., Panush, E.M., Powell, K., Spielvogel, R., Dubitsky, B., Cohen, M., Melnick, H., & Peterson, L. (1994). The Mathematics Learning Forums online: Using telecommunications as a tool for reflective practice.Machine-Mediated Learning, 4(2–3), 163–176.
Horwitz, P., & Barowy, W. (1994). Designing and using open-ended software to promote conceptual change.Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3, 161–185
Hunter, B. (1993, October). NSF's networked testbeds inform innovation in science education.T.H.E. Journal, 21, 96–99.
Jackson, S.L., Stratford, S.J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E., (1996, April). A learner-centered tool for students building models.Communications of the ACM, 39(4), 48–49.
Kozma R., & Schank, P. (1998). Connecting with the twenty-first century: Technology in support of educational reform. In D. Palumbo & C. Dede (Eds.),Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development 1998 Yearbook: Learning and technology.
Krajcik, J.S., Blumenfeld, P.C., Marx, R.W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping teachers learn project-based instruction.Elementary School Journal, 94, 483–497.
Linn, M.C. (1997). Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration environment.Journal of Science Education and Technology.
Linn, M.C., Bell, P., & Hsi, S. (in press). Lifelong Science Learning on the Internet: The Knowledge Integration Environment.Interactive Learning Environments.
Linn, M.C., diSessa, A., Pea, R.D., & Songer, N.B. (1994, March). Can research on science learning and instruction inform standards for science education?Journal of Science Education and Technology.
Means, B., Blando, J., Olson, K., Middleton, T., Morocco, C.C., Remz, A.R., & Zorfass, J. (1993).Using technology to support educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (1989).Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. NCTM: Reston, VA.
National Research Council (1996).The national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Science Foundation (NSF). (1996).The dynamic partnerships: Seeding and sustaining education reform conference. NSF: Washington, DC.
Norman, D.A., & Spohrer, J.C. (1996). Learner-centered education.Communications of the ACM, 39(4), 24–27.
Office of Science and Technology Policy. (1997 April).Science and technology: Shaping the twenty-first century. Report to Congress. Washington, DC: Office of the President.
President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). (1997).Report to the president on the use of technology to strengthen k-12 education in the United States. Panel of Educational Technology. (www.whitehouse.gov/WH/EOP/OSTP/NSTC/PCAST/k-12ed.html.)
Pea, R.D. (1992). Augmenting the discourse of learning with computer-based learning environments. In E. de Corte, M. Linn, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.),Computer-based learning environments and problem-solving (NATO Series, subseries F: Computer and System Sciences) (pp. 313–343). New York: Springer-Verlag GmbH.
Pea, R.D. (1994). Seeing what we build together: Distributed multimedia learning environments for transformative communications.Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 283–298.
Pea, R.D. (1998). Distributed intelligence and the growth of virtual learning communities over the global Internet. PC97 Keynote Address, Kyoto, Japan, Council for Improving Educational Computing. (Translation in Japanese).
Pea, R.D. (in press). New communication forums for improving educational research and practice. Chapter for three-volume work by the National Academy of Education, Commission for Improving Educational Research.
Pea, R.D., & Gomez, L. (1992). Distributed multimedia learning environments: Why and how?Interactive Learning Environments, 2(2), 73–109.
Pea, R.D., Gomez, L.M., Edelson, D.C., Fishman, B.J., Gordin, D.N., & O'Neill, D.K. (1997). Science education as a driver of cyberspace technology development. In K.C. Cohen (Ed.),Internet links for science education (pp 189–220). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Pea, R.D., Roschelle, J., DiGiano, C., Schank, P., & Schlager, M. (1997, December 13).A flying circus on the collaborative tailoring of educational objects. Videotape of invited plenary session of the Second International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL '97). University of Toronto/OISE, Canada. Springfield, IL: Center for Educational Television (60 minutes).
Reiner, M., Pea, R.D., & Shulman, D. (1995). The impact of simulator-based instruction on the diagramming of the interaction of light and matter by introductory physics students.Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(3), 199–226.
Resnick, D.P., & Resnick, L.B. (1985). Standards, curriculum, and performance: A historical and comparative perspective.Educational Researcher, 14(4), 5–20.
Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Sushak, M., Bergstrom, P., & Riedl, J. (1994). GroupLens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of NetNews.Proceedings of the Computer-Supported Collaborative Work 1994 Conference.
Riel, M., & Levin, J., (1990). Building Electronic communities: Successes and failures in computer networking,Instructional Science, 19, 145–169.
Riley, R.W., Kunin, M.M., Smith, M.S., & Roberts, L.G. (1996, June 29).Getting America's students ready for the 21st century: Meeting the technology literacy challenge—A report to the nation on technology and education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. (http://www.ed.gov/Technology/Plan/NatTechPlan/title.html).
Roberts, L. (1995, May). (Ed.).The future of networking technologies for learning (http://www.ed.gov/Technology/Futures). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology.
Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change.Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235–276.
Roschelle, J., & Kaput, J. (1996). Educational software architecture and systemic impact: The promise of component software.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(3), 217–228.
Roseman, M., & Greenberg, S. (1996). Team Rooms: Groupware for shared electronic spaces.Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI '96 Conference Companion, 275–276. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
Ruopp, R., Gal, S., Drayton, B., & Pfister, M. (Eds.). (1993).LabNet: Towards a community of practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Russell, J., & Kozma, R. (1994). 4m:chem—multimedia and mental models in chemistry.Journal of Chemical Education, 71, 669–670.
Sandholtz, J.H., Ringstaff, C, & Dwyer, D.C. (1997).Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. NY: Teachers College Press.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities.The Journal of the Learning Sciences 3(3), 265–283.
Schlager, M.S., & Schank, P.K. (1997). TAPPED IN: A new on-line teacher community concept for the next generation of Internet technology. InProceedings of CSCL '97, The Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, pp. 230–241.
Schmidt, W.H., McKnight, C.C., & Raizen., S. (1997).A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education. Boston: Kluwer.
Shardanand, U., & Maes, P. (1995). Social information filtering: Algorithms for automating “word of mouth.” InProceedings of CHI95, Computer Human Interaction, pp. 210–217.
Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching foundations of the new reform.Harvard Education Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Smith, J.P., diSessa, A.A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition.Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115–163.
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (1995, April).Teachers and technology: Making the connection. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
White, B.Y. (1993). ThinkerTools: Causal models, conceptual change, and science education.Cognition and Instruction, 10(1), 1–100.
Additional information
Roy Pea, of SRI International, is Director of CILT.
Marcia Linn (U. California, Berkeley), John Bransford (Vanderbilt University), Barbara Means (SRI International), and Robert Tinker (Concord Consortium), serve as CILT's coprincipal investigators.
Sherry Hsi (Ubiquitous Computing) and Sean Brophy (Technology and Assessment Models) are among the first group of CILT Postdoctoral Fellows.
Jeremy Roschelle (SRI International) and Nancy Songer (University of Michigan) are CILT theme-team leaders.
Roy Pea and Marcia Linn would like to thank the Spencer Foundation for support during their year at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, in which they developed the CILT concept with the other authors. CILT is funded by National Science Foundation grant #CDA-9720384. Pea and Linn would also like to acknowledge contributions to this article by the many authors of CILT partnership project proposals, and by theme-team leaders.
The authors thankfully acknowledge Donna Baranski-Walker for her many contributions to developing the CILT Industrial Alliance Program while serving as its Director in 1998.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pea, R.D., Tinker, R., Linn, M. et al. Toward a Learning Technologies knowledge network. ETR&D 47, 19–38 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299463
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299463