Abstract
Needs assessments are traditionally based on an optimals-actuals deficiency model that is utilized before instruction is implemented. However, in some cases an existing training program may be reassessed to determine what training needs still exist. These situations could benefit from an excess-based model, where the assessment effort is designed to identify instructional excesses as well as deficiencies. This article explains the theory and procedures for an innovative needs reassessment approach, the CODE system. The article also provides some empirical data on the potential value of the CODE process for decisions about the reallocation of instructional resources in existing training programs. Two exploratory studies were conducted that provide evidence of the validity of the CODE system: (a) a needs reassessment of a corporate training program, and (b) a medical training program reassessment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Broad, M.L., & Newstrom, J.W. (1992).Transfer of training: Action-packed strategies to ensure high payoff from training investments. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Ford, J.K., & Sego, D.J. (1990).Linking training evaluation to training needs assessment: A conceptual model (AFHRL-TP-90-69). Brooks AFB, TX: Air Force Human Resource Laboratory.
Ford, J.K., & Wroten, S. (1984). Introducing new methods for conducting training evaluation.Personnel Psychology, 37, 651–665.
Goldstein, I.L. (1993).Training in organization: Needs assessment, development, and evaluation (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Goldstein, I.L., Macey, W.H., & Prien, E.P. (1982). Training and human performance. In E.A. Fleishman (Ed.),Human Performance and Productivity, (Vol. 1), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gordon, S. (1994).Systematic training program design. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Jonassen, D., Tessmer, M., & Hannum, W. (1999).Handbook of task analysis procedures. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kaufman, R. (1972).Educational system planning. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Kaufman, R., & Bowers, D. (1990). Proactive and reactive planners: An even closer look at needs assessment and needs analysis.Performance and Instruction, 29(5), 7–10.
Kaufman, R., & English, F. (1979).Needs assessment: Concept and application. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Kaufman, R., & Thiagarajan, S. (1987). Identifying and specifying requirements for instruction. In R.M. Gagné (Ed.),Instructional technology systems (pp. 113–140). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lewis, T., & Bjorquist, D.C. (1992). Needs assessment—A critical reappraisal.Performance Improvement Quarterly, 5(4), 33–54.
Macey, W.H. (1982).Linking training needs assessment to training program design. Paper presented at the 90th convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
Noe, R.A. (1986). Trainees' attributes and attitudes: Neglected influences on training effectiveness.Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 736–749.
Quinones, M.A., Sego, D.J., Ford, J.K., & Smith, E.M. (1995). The effects of individual and transfer environment characteristics on the opportunity to perform trained tasks.Training Research Journal, 1(1), 29–49.
Rossett, A. (1987).Training needs assessment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Rossett, A. (1991). When performance and instructional technologists talk: Dialogue about impact, change, and personal growth.Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 7(2), 71–80.
Soriano, F.I. (1995).Conducting needs assessments: A multidisciplinary approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Stolovitch, H., & Keeps, E.J. (1994).Handbook of human performance technology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn.Cognition and Instruction, 12(3), 185–223.
Teachout, M., Sego, D., & Ford, K. (1997/98). An integrated approach to summative evaluation for facilitating training course improvement.Training Research Journal, 3, 1–16.
Tessmer, M., & Richey, R. (1997). The role of context in learning and instructional design.Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(2), 85–115.
Triner, D., Greenberry, A., & Watkins, R. (1996). Training needs assessment: A contradiction in terms?Educational Technology, 36(10), 51–55.
Watkins, R., & Kaufman, R. (1996). An update on relating needs assessment and needs analysis.Performance Improvement, 36(10), 10–13.
Witkin, R., & Altschuld, J.W. (1995).Planning and conducting needs assessments: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Witkin, R., & Eastmond, J.N. (1988). Bringing focus to the needs assessment study: The preassessment phase.Educational Planning, 6(4), 12–23.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tessmer, M., McCann, D. & Ludvigsen, M. Reassessing training programs: A model for identifying training excesses and deficiencies. ETR&D 47, 86–99 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299468
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299468