Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of cooperative learning strategies on performance, attitude toward working in teams, and group interaction behaviors in a technical training context. Participants were 274 engineering employees enrolled in a required training class that focused on communicating technical procedures in plant operations. Participants were divided into small groups and cooperative teams. Instruction was the same for all participants. Only the practice portion of the lesson reflected cooperative strategies versus no process direction. Results indicated that the practice conducted in a cooperative manner had a significant effect on performance and group behaviors. Participants in the cooperative teams performed better on the posttest, enjoyed working in teams, perceived more accomplishment, and displayed higher levels of social and cognitive interaction than participants who worked in unstructured small groups. Implications for integrating cooperative strategies into technical team training are provided.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, T.J. (1984).Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R & D organization. Cambride, MA: MIT Press.
Ancona, D.G., & Caldwell, D.F. (1990). Information technology and work groups: The case of new product teams. In J. Galegher, R.E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.),Intellectual teamwork (pp. 173–190). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephen, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978).The Jigsaw Classroom. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Cannon-Bowers, J., Oser, R., & Flanagan, D.L. (1992). Work teams in industry: A selected review and proposed framework. In E. Salas & R. Swezey (Eds.),Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 355–378). Norword, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Cicourel, A.V. (1990). The integration of distributed knowledge in collaborative medical diagnosis. In J. Galegher, R.E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.),Intellectual teamwork (pp. 221–242). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Decker, P. (1993). Invited reaction: The quality revolution and research—a need for more examination of teamwork.Human Resource Development Quarterly, 4(2). 149–151.
Dewey, J. (1916).Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.
Dobyns, L., & Crawford-Mason, C. (1991).Quality or else: The revolution in world business. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Dyer, J. (1984). Team research and team training: State-of-the-art review. In F.A. Muckler (Ed.),Human factors review (pp 285–323). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
Foushee, F., & Leister, A. (1977). Group interaction and flight crew performance. In E. Weiner & D. Nagel (Eds.),Human factors in aviation (pp. 189–228). San Diego: Academic Press.
Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1989).Cooperation and competion: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K.A. (1991a).Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K.A. (1991b).Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productiviey. (Report Four). Washington, DC: ERIC.
King, A. (1989). Verbal interaction and problem-solving within computer-assisted cooperative learning groups.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(1) 1–15.
Klein, J.D., & Pridemore, D.R. (1992). Effects of cooperative learning and need for affiliation on performance, time on task, and satisfaction.Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(4), 39–47.
Lambiotte, J.G., Dansereau, D.F., O'Donnell, A.M., Young, M.D., Skaggs, L.P., Hall, R.H., & Rocklin, T.R. (1987). Manipulating cooperative scripts for teaching and learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 424–430.
Larson, C.E., & LaFasto, F.M.J., (1989).Teamwork: What must go right/what can go wrong. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Lawler, E., Mohrman, S., & Ledford, G. (1992).Employee involvement and total quality management: Practices and results in fortune 1000 companies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
McDonald, B.A., Larson, C.O., Dansereau, D.F., & Spurlin, J.E. (1985). Cooperative dyads: Impact on text learning and transfer.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, 369–377.
Morgan, B., Glickman, A., Woodard, E., Blaiwes, A., & Salas, E. (1986).Measurement of team behaviors in a Navy environment. (Tech. Rep. No. NTSC TR-86-014). Orlando, FL: Naval Training Systems Center.
Salas, E., Dickinson, T., Converse, S., & Tannenbaum, S. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In E. Salas & R. Swezey (Eds.),Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 3–29). Norword, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Sherman, G.P., & Klein, J.D. (1994).The effects of cued interaction and ability grouping during cooperative computer-based science instruction. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Sharan, S. (1980). Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes, and ethnic relations.Review of Educational Research, 50, 241–272.
Slavin, R.E. (1990).Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Slavin, R.E. (1991).Student team learning: A practical guide to cooperative learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: NEA Professional Library.
Stech, E., & Ratliffe, S. (1985).Effective group communication: How to get action by working in groups. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
Trowbridge, D., & Duran, R. (1984).Results from an investigation of groups working at the computer. (NSF Research Rep. No. 143) National Science Foundation, Washington, DC: California University, Irvine, Educational Technology Center.
Webb, N.M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups.International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 21–39.
Yager, S., Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1985). Oral discussions, group-to-individual transfer, and achievement in cooperative learning groups.Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(1), 60–66.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cavalier, J.C., Klein, J.D. & Cavalier, F.J. Effects of cooperative learning on performance, attitude, and group behaviors in a technical team environment. ETR&D 43, 61–72 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300456
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300456