Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Optical processing is a fast, easy, economical, and reliable method of quantifying map patterns. A reduced transparency of a zebra-like pattern, obtained by blackening in alternate contour bands of a map, is used as input to an optical system of a laser source and objective lens to produce Fourier transforms. By sampling the intensity distribution across the transform, information about the spatial frequency (periodicity) and orientation in the original map can be inferred. Parameters used for comparing the map images are the values of intensity distribution in the transform. These intensities are normalized and subjected to comparison using various similarity methods. Cross-multiplication of the intensities is suggested as a measure of vectorial comparison of the orientations. By plotting the directional intensities into a polar coordinate system, rose diagrams are prepared for visual comparison. Optically derived parameters are independent of scale and other restrictive and limiting requirements as demanded in techniques of map analyses based on numerically derived parameters. The technique can be used in analyzing other pictorial data including aerial photographs, rock-fabric diagrams, and thin sections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cole, V. B., 1962, Configuration of top of Precambrian basement rocks in Kansas: Kansas Geol. Survey Oil and Gas Inv. 26, map.

  • Davis, J. C., 1970, Optical processing of microporous fabrics,in Cutbill, J. L., ed., Data processing in biology and geology: Systematics Assoc, Spec. v., no. 3, London, Academic Press, p. 68–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. C., 1973, Statistics and data analysis in geology: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 550 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. C, and Preston, F. W., 1972, Optical processing: an alternative to digital computing: Geol. Soc. America, Sp. Paper 146, p. 49–86.

  • Dobrin, M. B., Ingalls, A. L., and Long, J. A., 1965, Velocity and frequency filtering of seismic data using laser light: Geophysics, v. 30, no. 6, p. 1144–1178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egbert, D. D., McCauley, J. R., and McNaughton, J. L., 1973, Ground pattern analysis in the Great Plains: ERTS-A proposal no. 60–8, user investigation report, 108 p.

  • Goodman, J. W., 1968, Introduction to Fourier optics: McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 286 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. L., 1965, Diffractive processing of geophysical data: Applied Optics, v. 4, no. 4, p. 419–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, F. A., and White, H. E., 1957, Fundamentals of optics: McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 637 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumbein, W. C., 1966, A comparison of polynomial and Fourier models in map analysis: Tech. Rept. no. 2, ONR Task no. 388-078, Office of Naval Research, Geography Branch, 45 p.

  • McCullagh, M. J., and Davis, J. C., 1972, Optical analysis of two-dimensional patterns: Annals Assoc. Am. Geographers, v. 62, no. 4, p. 561–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, D. F., 1957, Preliminary regional structural contour map on top of the Dakota Formation (Cretaceous) in Kansas: Kansas Geol. Survey Oil and Gas Inv. 14, map.

  • Merriam, D. F., 1958, Preliminary regional structural contour map on top of the Stone Corral Formation (Permian) in Kansas: Kansas Geol. Survey Oil and Gas Inv. 17, map.

  • Merriam, D. F., 1970, Preliminary regional structural contour map on top of Mississippian rocks in Kansas: Kansas Geol. Survey Oil and Gas Inv. 22, map.

  • Merriam, D. F., and Lippert, R. H., 1966, Geologic model studies using trend-surface analysis: Jour. Geology, v. 74, no. 3, p. 344–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, D. F., and Smith, P., 1961, Preliminary regional structural contour map on top of the Arbuckle Group (Cambrian-Ordovician) in Kansas: Kansas Geol. Survey Oil and Gas Inv. 25, map.

  • Merriam, D. F., and Sneath, P. H. A., 1966, Quantitative comparison of contour maps: Jour. Geophysical Res., v. 71, no. 4, p. 1105–1115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, D. F., Winchell, R. L., and Atkinson, W. R., 1958, Preliminary regional structural contour map on top of the Lansing Group (Pennsylvanian) in Kansas: Kansas Geol. Survey Oil and Gas Inv. 19, map.

  • Miller, R. L., 1964, Comparison analysis of trend maps:in Computers in mineral industries: Stanford Univ. Publ., Geol. Sciences, v. 9, p. 669–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papoulis, A., 1968, Systems and transforms with application in optics: McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 474 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, H. J., 1966, Optical processing of vectorial rock fabric data: Internat. Soc. Rock Mechanics, Proc. 1st Internat. Cong., Lisbon, v. 2, p. 173–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, H. J., 1969a, Sensitivity of optical data processing to changes in rock fabrics, Pt. I, Geometric patterns: Intl. Jour. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., v. 6, p. 259–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, H. J., 1969b, Sensitivity of optical data processing to changes in rock fabrics, Pt. II, Standardized grain patterns: Intl. Jour. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., v. 6, p. 269–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, H. J., 1969c, Sensitivity of topical data processing to changes in rock fabrics, Pt. III, Rock fabrics: Intl. Jour. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., v. 6, p. 273–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, H. J., and Ali, S. A., 1968, Optical data processing of sedimentary structures: Jour. Sed. Pet., v. 38, no. 2, p. 457–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, H. J., and Dobrin, M. B., 1966, Optical processing of geological data: Jour. Geophysical Res., v. 71, no. 20, p. 4861–4871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, H. J., Power, P. C., Jr., and Woodzick, T., 1973, Analysis of contour maps by optical diffraction: GEOFORUM, 14/73, Wolfsburg, Germany, p. 39–52.

  • Preston, F. W., Green, D. W., and Davis, J. C., 1970, Numerical characterization of reservoir rock pore structure: Final rept. Am. Petroleum Inst., Res. Proj, no. 103, Univ. Kansas, Center for Research Inc., 98 p.

  • Rao, S. V. L. N., and Srivastava, G. S., 1967, Comparison of subset trend surfaces by utilization of information theory,in Computer applications in the earth sciences: Colloquium on time-series analysis: Kansas Geol. Survey Computer Contr. 18, p. 62–67.

  • Rao, S. V. L. N., and Srivastava, G. S., 1969, Comparison regression surfaces in geologic studies: Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., v. 72, no. 1, p. 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayleigh, L., 1896, On the theory of optical images, with special reference to the microscope: Philosophy Mag., v. 5, p. 167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. E., Charlesworth, H. A. K., and Ellis, M. J., 1969, Structural analysis using spatial filtering in interior plains of south-central Alberta: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 53, no. 11, p. 2341–2367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, B., 1957, Optics: Addison-Wesley Publ. Co., Reading, Massachusetts, 510 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, A. R., 1970, Optical data processing: John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 710 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., and Sneath, P. H. A., 1963, Principles of numerical taxonomy: W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 359 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, G. S., 1975, Geoptronics, a term proposed for optical processing of geological data: Jour. Math. Geol., v. 7, no. 2, p. 183–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, G. S., and Merriam, D. F., 1974, Quantitative comparison of contour maps using optically derived parameters (abst.): Geol. Soc. America Abst., v. 6, no. 7, p. 964–965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, G. S., and Merriam, D. F., 1976, Computer constructed optical-rose diagrams: Computers & Geosciences, v. 1, no. 3, p. 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tippet, J. T., Berkowitz, D. A., Clapp, L. O., Koester, C. J., and Vanderbrugh, A., Jr., 1968, Optical and electro-optical information processing: M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 780 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolard, G. P., 1958, Bouger gravity anomaly map of Kansas: Kansas Geol. Survey Bull. 137, plate 1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Srivastava, G.S. Optical processing of structural contour maps. Mathematical Geology 9, 3–38 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02312493

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02312493

Key words

Navigation