Abstract
The lack of understanding of the effect of the rotation of secondary principal axes has been a severe limitation of the scattered-light method. The method of Poincare's equivalent system has been applied in order to develop a general formula for scattered-light intensity. Relationships among the orientation of eigenvectors and their phase retardation and stresses have been found. The method is illustrated by the solution of the problem of a circular rod loaded by a combination of torsion and axial load. An experimental procedure has also been suggested.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- E i :
-
component of light vector
- \(\sigma _{ij} \) :
-
component of stress tensor
- U :
-
transformation unitary matrix
- M i :
-
component of the transformation matrix
- x, y, z :
-
referential coordinate axes
- x o ,y o ,z :
-
referential coordinate axes at the point of entrance to the model
- u, v :
-
eigenvectors
- u o ,v o :
-
eigenvectors at the point of entrance to the model
- 2Δ:
-
phase retardation, deg
- \(2\Delta _o \) :
-
phase retardation of the eigenvectors, deg
- \(2\Delta _k \) :
-
phase retardation of the compensator, deg
- I sc :
-
scattered-light intensity
- I scc :
-
scattered-light intensity, incident light circularly polarized
- ϕ:
-
angle of rotation of secondary principal axes, deg
- R :
-
\(\frac{{d\phi }}{{d\Delta }}\)
- \(\omega _1 ,\omega _2 \) :
-
angle of eigenvectors and axes of referential coordinate system, deg
- \(\omega _1 ^* ,\omega _2 ^* \) :
-
angles of eigenvectors and secondary principal stresses, deg
- \(\theta = \omega _1 + \omega _2 \) :
-
Poincare rotator angle, deg
- α:
-
observation angle, deg
- β:
-
angle of principal direction of the compensator and polarization of incident light, deg
- γ:
-
angle of principal direction of the compensator and eigenvector, deg
- \(\alpha _2 \) :
-
angle of eigenvector and the direction of observation, deg
References
Srinath, L. S., “Analysis of Scattered-light Methods in Photoelasticity,”Experimental Mechanics,9 (10),463–468 (1969).
Anderholt, R., McKinney, J. M., Ranson, W. F. andSwinson, W. F., “Effect of Rotating Secondary Principal Axes in Scattered-light Photelasticity,”Experimental Mechanics,10 (4),160–165 (1970).
Drucker, D. R. andMindlin, R. D., “Stress Analysis by Three-dimensional Photoelastic Methods,”J. Appl. Phys.,11,724 (1940).
Aben, H. K., “Optical Phenomena in Photoelastic Models by the Rotation of Principal Axes,”Experimental Mechanics,6 (1),13–22 (1966).
Pipes, L. A., Applied Mathematics for Engineers and Physicist, McGraw-Hill, New York (1958).
Richartz, M. and Hsu, H. Y., “Analysis of Elliptical Polarization,” J. of Opt. Soc. of Am., 136 (Feb. 1949).
Poincare, H., Théorie Mathématique de la Lumière, ed. by Gauthier Villars, Paris (1889).
Jones, R. C., “A New Calculus for the Treatment of Optical Systems I,” J. of Opt. Soc. of Am.,488 (July 1941).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cernosek, J. On the effect of rotating secondary principal stresses in scattered-light photoelasticity. Experimental Mechanics 13, 273–279 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02322723
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02322723